A Rate Splitting Strategy for Uplink CR-NOMA Systems
Hongwu Liu, Zhiquan Bai, Hongjiang Lei, Gaofeng Pan, Kyeong Jin Kim and Theodoros A. Tsiftsis
- arXiv
- 2110.02281v3 · PDF · 31 January 2022
- Categories
- cs.IT, math.IT
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.
Abstract
In uplink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) channels, the existing cooperative successive interference cancellation (SIC) and power control (PC) schemes lack the capability of achieving the full capacity region, which restricts the outage performance of uplink NOMA users. For the uplink cognitive radio (CR) inspired NOMA system, we propose a new rate splitting (RS) strategy to maximize the achievable rate of the secondary user without deteriorating the primary user’s outage performance. Based on the interference threshold and its own channel gain, the secondary user adaptively conducts RS, transmit power allocation and SIC, which utilizes the transmit power efficiently. Closed-form expression of the outage probability is derived for the secondary user. Numerical results show that the proposed RS scheme achieves the best outage performance for the secondary user among the existing cooperative SIC and PC schemes.
Items 5
Corresponding to the RS scheme’s operation of Case II, the probability that U_1 is in outage is given by
\begin{aligned}
P_{\rm out}^{(\rm II)} = e^{\frac{1}{P_1}} \mu\left( \frac{1}{P_1 \eta_0}\right) - e^{-\frac{\varepsilon_0 + \varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_0 \varepsilon_1}{P_1}} \mu\left( -\frac{P_0}{P_1} \right)
\end{aligned}
with \eta_0 \triangleq \frac{\varepsilon_0}{P_0} and
\begin{aligned}
\mu(\nu) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\eta_0 \varepsilon_1 }, &{ {\rm if~~} \nu = 0 },\\
\frac{e^{- \eta_0 (\nu+1) } - e^{- \eta_0 (\nu+1) (1+\varepsilon_1) }}{ \nu + 1 } , &{\rm otherwise}.
\end{array}} \right.
\end{aligned}
Proof of Theorem 1
Corresponding to the RS scheme’s operations in Cases I and III, probabilities that U_1 is in outage are given by
\begin{aligned}
P_{\rm out}^{(\rm I)} = e^{-\eta_0} - e^{\frac{1}{P_1}} \mu\left( \frac{1}{P_1 \eta_0} \right) - e^{-\eta_0(1 + \varepsilon_1) - \eta_1},
\end{aligned}
\begin{aligned}
P_{\rm out}^{(\rm III)} = 1 - e^{-\eta_0} - \frac{ e^{-\eta_1} (1 - e^{-\eta_0(P_0\eta_1 + 1)}) }{P_0 \eta_1 + 1} ,
\end{aligned}
respectively, where \eta_1 \triangleq \frac{\varepsilon_1}{P_1}.
The outage probability experienced by the secondary user in the proposed RS scheme is given by
\begin{aligned}
P_{\rm out} &\!\!\!=\!\!\!& 1 - e^{-\eta_0(1 + \varepsilon_1) - \eta_1}
- e^{-\frac{\varepsilon_0 + \varepsilon_1 + \varepsilon_0 \varepsilon_1}{P_1}} \mu\left( - \frac{P_0}{P_1} \right) \\
&\!\!\! \!\!\!& - \frac{ e^{-\eta_1} (1 - e^{-\eta_0(P_0\eta_1 + 1)}) }{P_0 \eta_1 + 1}.
\end{aligned}
Proof of Corollary 1
By combing P_{\rm out}^{(\rm I)}, P_{\rm out}^{(\rm II)}, and P_{\rm out}^{(\rm III)}, the outage probability is obtained as (1).
Source and licence
The text on this page is from arXiv:2110.02281v3 by Hongwu Liu, Zhiquan Bai, Hongjiang Lei, Gaofeng Pan, Kyeong Jin Kim and Theodoros A. Tsiftsis, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.
The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2110/2110.02281.jsonl.