arXiv reader

On the distance spectrum and distance-based topological indices of central vertex-edge join of three graphs

Haritha T and Chithra A. V.

arXiv
2210.01497v1 · PDF · 4 October 2022
Categories
math.CO
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

Topological indices are molecular descriptors that describe the properties of chemical compounds. These topological indices correlate specific physico-chemical properties like boiling point, enthalpy of vaporization, strain energy, and stability of chemical compounds. This article introduces a new graph operation based on central graph called central vertex-edge join and provides its results related to graph invariants like eccentric-connectivity index, connective eccentricity index, total-eccentricity index, average eccentricity index, Zagreb eccentricity indices, eccentric geometric-arithmetic index, eccentric atom-bond connectivity index, and Wiener index. Also, we discuss the distance spectrum of the central vertex-edge join of three regular graphs. Furthermore, we obtain new families of D-equienergetic graphs, which are non D-cospectral.

Items 16

Definition

Definition 1.1

J81Z

Let G_{n_1}, G_{n_2} and G_{n_3} be any three graphs of orders n_1, n_2, n_3 and sizes m_1, m_2, m_3 respectively. The central vertex-edge join (CVE-join) of G_{n_1} with G_{n_2} and G_{n_3}, is the graph G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E), is obtained from C(G_{n_1}), G_{n_2} and G_{n_3} by joining each vertex of G_{n_1} with every vertex of G_{n_2} and each vertex corresponding to the edges of G_{n_1} with every vertex of G_{n_3}. The set of vertices in C(G_{n_1}) corresponding to the edges of G_{n_1} is denoted by I(G_{n_1}).

Lemma

Lemma 2.1

6JIR

[cvet] Let G_n be a k-regular graph of order n and size m with Spec(G_n)= \{\theta_1, \theta_2,\ldots, \theta_n\}. Then

Spec (L(G_n))=\begin{pmatrix} 2k-2 & \theta_2+k-2 & \dots & \theta_n+k-2 & -2\\ 1&1&\dots&1&m-n\\ \end{pmatrix}.

Moreover, -2 is an eigenvalue of L(G_n) with eigenvector V if and only if Q(G_n)V=0.

Theorem

Theorem 2.2

HTUI

For i=1,2,3, let G_{n_i} be a k_i-regular graph of order n_i and size m_i, where G_{n_1} is triangle-free. Then the D-eigenvalues of G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E) are the following

  • (i) \frac{-3+\theta_{1j}\pm \sqrt{(\theta_{1j}+1)^2+4(\theta_{1j}+k_1)}}{2}, j= 2, 3,\ldots, n_1.

  • (ii) -2 with multiplicity m_1-n_1.

  • (iii) -\theta_{ij}-2, i=2,3 and j= 2, 3,\ldots, n_i.

  • (iv) eigenvalues of the matrix

    \begin{bmatrix} n_1-1+k_1& 2m_1-k_1& n_2& 2n_3\\2n_1-2& 2m_1-2& 2n_2& n_3\\n_1& 2m_1& 2n_2-k_2-2& 3n_3\\2n_1& m_1& 3n_2& 2n_3-k_3-2\end{bmatrix}.
Proof of Theorem 2.2

By a proper ordering of vertices in G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E), the distance matrix D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)) can be written as

\begin{aligned} &D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E))\\ &= \scriptsize{\begin{bmatrix} J_{n_1}-I_{n_1}+A(G_{n_1}) & 2J_{n_1\times m_1}-Q(G_{n_1}) & J_{n_1\times n_2}& 2J_{n_1\times n_3} \\ 2J_{m_1\times n_1}-Q(G_{n_1})^T & 2(J_{m_1}-I_{m_1}) & 2J_{m_1\times n_2}& J_{m_1\times n_3}\\ J_{n_2\times n_1} & 2J_{n_2\times m_1} & 2(J_{n_2}-I_{n_2})-A(G_{n_2})& 3J_{n_2\times n_3}\\2J_{n_3\times n_1}& J_{n_3\times m_1}& 3J_{n_3\times n_2}& 2(J_{n_3}-I_{n_3})-A(G_{n_3}) \end{bmatrix}}. \end{aligned}

Let k_i=\theta_{i1}\geq \theta_{i2}\geq\dots\geq \theta_{in_i} be the A-eigenvalues of G_{n_i}, where i = 1, 2, 3. Let U be a vector such that A(G_{n_1})U= \theta_{1j}U (for j= 2, 3,\ldots, n_1), then by Perron-Frobenius theory J_{1\times n_{1}}U= 0.
Now let, \phi_1= \begin{bmatrix} tU\\Q(G_{n_1})^TU\\0\\0\end{bmatrix} be an eigenvector of D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)) for the eigenvalue \mu, where t is a real number. Then D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E))\phi_1= \mu \phi_1.
That is,

\scriptsize{\begin{aligned} &\begin{bmatrix}J_{n_1}-I_{n_1}+A(G_{n_1}) & 2J_{n_1\times m_1}-Q(G_{n_1}) & J_{n_1\times n_2}& 2J_{n_1\times n_3} \\ 2J_{m_1\times n_1}-Q(G_{n_1})^T & 2(J_{m_1}-I_{m_1}) & 2J_{m_1\times n_2}& J_{m_1\times n_3}\\ J_{n_2\times n_1} & 2J_{n_2\times m_1} & 2(J_{n_2}-I_{n_2})-A(G_{n_2})& 3J_{n_2\times n_3}\\2J_{n_3\times n_1}& J_{n_3\times m_1}& 3J_{n_3\times n_2}& 2(J_{n_3}-I_{n_3})-A(G_{n_3}) \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} tU\\Q(G_{n_1})^TU\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}\\ &= \mu\begin{bmatrix} tU\\Q(G_{n_1})^TU\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}\\ \\ &\begin{bmatrix}(-t+\theta_{1j}t-\theta_{1j}-k_1)U\\(-t-2)Q(G_{n_1})^TU\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} \mu tU\\\mu Q(G_{n_1})^TU\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}. \end{aligned}}

Therefore,

\begin{aligned} \quad -t+\theta_{1j}t-\theta_{1j}-k_1&= \mu t\\ \quad-t-2&= \mu \end{aligned}

from this, we get

t^2+(\theta_{1j}+1)t-(\theta_{1j}+k_1)= 0

so that t has two values

\begin{aligned} &t_1 = \frac{-(\theta_{1j}+1)+ \sqrt{(\theta_{1j}+1)^2+4(\theta_{1j}+k_1)}}{2},\\ & t_2 = \frac{-(\theta_{1j}+1)- \sqrt{(\theta_{1j}+1)^2+4(\theta_{1j}+k_1)}}{2}. \end{aligned}

That is, -t_1-2 and -t_2-2 are eigenvalues of D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)) corresponding to the eigenvalues \theta_{1j}\neq k_1 of A(G_{n_1}). Thus, we get 2(n_1-1) eigenvalues of D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)).
By Lemma 2.1, we get Q(G_{n_1})V=0, where V is an eigenvector of L(G_{n_1}) corresponding to the eigenvalue -2 (repeated m_1-n_1 times).
If \phi_2= \begin{bmatrix}0\\V\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}, then we have

D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E))\phi_2= -2\phi_2.

Therefore, -2 is an eigenvalue of D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)) repeated m_1-n_1 times.
Consider the eigenvalue \theta_{2j} (for j= 2,3,\ldots,n_2) of G_{n_2} with an eigenvector W such that J_{1\times n_2}W= 0.
Put \phi_3= \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\W\\0 \end{bmatrix}, then we have

D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E))\phi_3= -(\theta_{2j} +2)\phi_3.

This shows that -(\theta_{2j} +2) are eigenvalues of D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)) corresponding to the eigenvalues \theta_{2j}\neq k_2 of A(G_{n_2}).
Similarly, for each eigenvalue \theta_{3j} (for j= 2,3,\ldots,n_3) of G_{n_3}, we get an eigenvalue -(\theta_{3j} +2) of D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)) with eigenvector \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0\\X\end{bmatrix}. Thus, we get 2n_1-2+m_1-n_1+n_2-1+n_3-1= n_1+m_1+n_2+n_3-4 eigenvalues of D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)). All the other eigenvalues of D(G_{n_1}^C \triangleright (G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_3}^E)) are the eigenvalues of the equitable quotient matrix

M= \begin{bmatrix} n_1-1+k_1& 2m_1-k_1& n_2& 2n_3\\2n_1-2& 2m_1-2& 2n_2& n_3\\n_1& 2m_1& 2n_2-k_2-2& 3n_3\\2n_1& m_1& 3n_2& 2n_3-k_3-2\end{bmatrix}.
Theorem

Theorem 2.3

YOIE

Let H_{n_1} be a k_1-regular triangle free graph of order n_1 and size m_1 and H_{n_2} be a k_2- regular graph of order n_2 and size m_2 with the least eigenvalue being at least -2. Then for every a\in \mathbb N, H_{n_1}^C \triangleright (C_P^V\cup H_{n_2}^E) forms a family of D-equienergetic graphs.

Proof of Theorem 2.3

Let k_1=\theta_1\geq\theta_2\geq\cdots\geq \theta_{n_1}, 2=\lambda_1\geq \lambda_2\geq\cdots\geq\lambda_a and k_2=\gamma_1\geq\gamma_2\geq\cdots\geq \gamma_{n_2} be the A-eigenvalues of H_{n_1}, C_P and H_{n_2} respectively. From Theorem 2.2, the D-eigenvalues of H_{n_1}^C \triangleright (C_P^V\cup H_{n_2}^E) are \frac{-3+\theta_j\pm \sqrt{(\theta_j+1)^2+4(\theta_j+k_1)}}{2}, j= 2, 3,\ldots, n_1; -2 with multiplicity m_1-n_1; -\lambda_{j^{'}}-2, j^{'}=2,3,\ldots,a; -\gamma_{j^{''}}-2, j^{''}=2,3,\ldots,n_2 and along with the eigenvalues of the equitable quotient matrix M of H_{n_1}^C \triangleright (C_P^V\cup H_{n_2}^E),

\begin{bmatrix} n_1+k_1-1& 2m_1-k_1& a& 2n_2\\ 2n_1-2& 2m_1-2& 2a& n_2\\ n_1& 2m_1& 2a-4& 3n_2\\ 2n_1& m_1& 3a& 2n_2-k_2-2\end{bmatrix}

for every partition P of 'a'.
Since \lambda_{j^{'}}\geq -2, for j^{'}=2,3,\ldots,a, we have -(\lambda_{j^{'}}+2)\leq 0. Similarly, we get -(\gamma_{j^{''}}+2)\leq 0, j^{''}=2,3,\ldots,n_2.
Therefore,

\begin{aligned} \sum_{j^{'}=2}^{a}|{-\lambda_{j^{'}}-2}|+\sum_{j^{''}=2}^{n_2}|{-\gamma_{j^{''}}-2}|&= \sum_{j^{'}=2}^a(\lambda_{j^{'}}+2)+\sum_{j^{''}=2}^{n_2}(\gamma_{j^{''}}+2)\\ &= -2+2(a-1)-k_2+2(n_2-1)\\ &= 2a-k_2+2n_2-6. \end{aligned}

Hence for every partition of 'a', the energy remains the same.

Theorem

Theorem 3.1

PVRJ

For i= 1,2,3, let G_{n_i} be a k_i- regular graph of order n_i and size m_i, where G_{n_1} is triangle-free. Then the Wiener index of \mathcal{G}= G_{n_1}^{C}\vee(G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_2}^E) is given by,
W(\mathcal{G})= \frac{1}{2}(n_1^2-n_1+2(n_2^2+n_3^2+n_1n_2-n_2-n_3+m_1n_3+m_1^2)+4(n_1n_3+m_1n_1+m_1n_2-m_1)-(n_2k_2+n_3k_3)+6n_2n_3).

Proof of Theorem 3.1

Let the vertex set of \mathcal{G}= G_{n_1}^{C}\vee(G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_2}^E) be
V(\mathcal{G})= \{v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_{n_1}, v_{e_1}, v_{e_2}, \ldots, v_{e_{m_1}}, u_1, u_2, \ldots, u_{n_2}, w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_{n_3} \}, where v_1, v_2, \ldots, v_{n_1} are the vertices in G_{n_1}, v_{e_1}, v_{e_2}, \ldots, v_{e_{m_1}} are the vertices corresponding to the edges of G_{n_1} in C(G_{n_1}), u_1, u_2, \ldots, u_{n_2} are the vertices in G_{n_2}, and w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_{n_3} are the vertices in G_{n_3}. Then

\begin{aligned} Tr(v_i)&= n_1+n_2+2n_3+2m_1-1,\; i= 1, \ldots, n_1.\\ Tr(v_{e_j})&= 2n_1+2n_2+n_3+2m_1-4,\; j= 1, \ldots, m_1.\\ Tr(u_k)&= n_1+2n_2+3n_3+2m_1-k_2-2,\; k= 1, \ldots, n_2.\\ Tr(w_l)&= 2n_1+3n_2+2n_3+m_1-k_3-2,\; l= 1, \ldots, n_3. \end{aligned}

From (8),

\begin{aligned} W(\mathcal{G}) &= \frac{1}{2}\sum_{v_i\in V(\mathcal{G})}Tr(v_i)\\ &= \frac{1}{2}(n_1^2-n_1+2(n_2^2+n_3^2+n_1n_2-n_2-n_3+m_1n_3+m_1^2)\\ &\; \; \;+4(n_1n_3+m_1n_1+m_1n_2-m_1)-(n_2k_2+n_3k_3)+6n_2n_3). \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 3.2

JHJW

For i= 1,2,3, let G_{n_i} be a graph of order n_i and size m_i, then

  • (i) \xi^c(\mathcal{G})=\begin{cases} 2n_1^2+5n_1n_2+5m_1n_3-2n_1+4m_1+6m_2+6m_3, & \text{ifG_n_1is triangle-free}\\3n_1^2+6n_1n_2+6m_1n_3-3n_1+6(m_1+m_2+m_3), &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

  • (ii) \xi^{ce}(\mathcal{G})= \begin{cases} \frac{1}{6}\left(3n_1^2+5(n_1n_2+m_1n_3)+6m_1+4(m_2+m_3)-3n_1\right), & \text{ifG_n_1is triangle-free}\\\frac{1}{3}\left(n_1^2+2(n_1n_2+m_1n_3)-n_1+2(m_1+m_2+m_3)\right), &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

Proof of Theorem 3.2
  • (i) Let \mathcal{G}= G_{n_1}^{C}\vee(G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_2}^E), where G_{n_1} is triangle-free, then from (1) by using (9) and (10), we have

    \begin{aligned} \xi^c(\mathcal{G})&= \sum_{v\in V(G_{n_1})}2(n_1+n_2-1)+ \sum_{v\in I(G_{n_1})}2(n_3+2)\\ &\; \; \;+ \sum_{v\in V(G_{n_2})}3(deg_{G_{n_2}}(v)+n_1)+ \sum_{v\in V(G_{n_3})} 3(deg_{G_{n_3}}(v)+m_1)\\ &= 2n_1^2+5n_1n_2+5m_1n_3-2n_1+4m_1+6m_2+6m_3. \end{aligned}

    Similarly in the case when G_{n_1} is not a triangle-free graph by using (9) and (10) we get,

    \xi^c(\mathcal{G})= 3n_1^2+6n_1n_2+6m_1n_3-3n_1+6(m_1+m_2+m_3).
  • (ii) Let G_{n_1} be a triangle-free graph. Then from (2), by using (9) and (10), we get

    \begin{aligned} \xi^{ce}(\mathcal{G})&= \sum_{v\in V(G_{n_1})}\frac{n_1+n_2-1}{2}+\sum_{v\in I(G_{n_1})}\frac{n_3+2}{2}+\sum_{v\in V(G_{n_2})}\frac{deg_{G_{n_2}} +n_1}{3}\\ &\; \; \;+\sum_{v\in V(G_{n_3})}\frac{deg_{G_{n_3}}+m_1}{3}\\ &= \frac{1}{6}\left(3n_1^2+5(n_1n_2+m_1n_3)+6m_1+4(m_2+m_3)-3n_1\right). \end{aligned}

    Similarly in the case when G_{n_1} is not a triangle-free graph by using (9) and (10) we get,

    \xi^{ce}(\mathcal{G})= \frac{1}{3}\left(n_1^2+2(n_1n_2+m_1n_3)-n_1+2(m_1+m_2+m_3)\right).
Theorem

Theorem 3.3

J0FF

For i= 1,2,3, let G_{n_i} be a graph of order n_i and size m_i, then

  • (i) \tau(\mathcal{G})=\begin{cases} 2n_1+2m_1+3n_2+3n_3, & \text{ifG_n_1is triangle-free}\\3(n_1+n_2+n_3+m_1), &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

  • (ii) aveg(\mathcal{G})= \begin{cases} \frac{2n_1+2m_1+3n_2+3n_3}{n_1+n_2+n_3+m_1}, & \text{ifG_n_1is triangle-free}\\3, &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

Proof of Theorem 3.3
  • (i) Consider \mathcal{G}= G_{n_1}^{C}\vee(G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_2}^E), when G_{n_1} is triangle-free, then from (3) by using (10), we get

    \begin{aligned} \tau(\mathcal{G})&= 2n_1+2m_1+3n_2+3n_3. \end{aligned}

    Similarly when G_{n_1} is not a triangle-free graph we get

    \begin{aligned} \tau(\mathcal{G})&= 3(n_1+n_2+n_3+m_1). \end{aligned}
  • (ii) From (4), we get

    \begin{aligned} aveg(\mathcal{G})&= \frac{\tau(\mathcal{G})}{n_1+n_2+n_3+m_1}\\ &= \begin{cases} \frac{2n_1+2m_1+3n_2+3n_3}{n_1+n_2+n_3+m_1}, & \text{if $G_{n_1}$ is triangle-free}\\3, &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}. \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 3.4

HECX

For i= 1,2,3, let G_{n_i} be a graph of order n_i and size m_i, then

  • (i) M_1(\mathcal{G})=\begin{cases} 4n_1+4m_1+9n_2+9n_3, & \text{ifG_n_1is triangle-free}\\9(n_1+n_2+n_3+m_1), &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

  • (ii) M_2(\mathcal{G})= \begin{cases}4m_1+9(m_2+m_3)+2(n_1^2-n_1)+6(n_1n_2+m_1n_3) , & \text{ifG_n_1is triangle-free}\\9\left(m_1+m_2+m_3+n_1n_2+m_1n_3+\frac{n_1^2-n_1}{2}\right), &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

Proof of Theorem 3.4
  • (i) Let \mathcal{G}= G_{n_1}^{C}\vee(G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_2}^E), where G_{n_1} is triangle-free, then from (5) by using (10) we get

    \begin{aligned} M_1(\mathcal{G})&= \sum_{v\in V(G_{n_1})}2^2+\sum_{v\in I(G_{n_1})}2^2+\sum_{v\in V(G_{n_2})}3^2+\sum_{v\in V(G_{n_3})}3^2\\ &= 4n_1+4m_1+9n_2+9n_3. \end{aligned}

    Similarly when G_{n_1} is not a triangle-free graph we get,

    M_1(\mathcal{G})= 9(n_1+n_2+n_3+m_1).
  • (ii) Let G_{n_1} be a triangle-free graph. Then from (5) by using (10) we get

    \begin{aligned} M_2(\mathcal{G})&= \sum_{uv\in E(G_{n_2})}3\times 3+\sum_{uv\in E(G_{n_3})}3\times 3+\sum_{{\substack{u\in V(G_{n_1}), \\ v\in V(G_{n_2})}}}2\times 3\\ &\; \; +\sum_{{\substack{u\in I(G_{n_1}), \\ v\in V(G_{n_3})}}}2\times 3+\sum_{{\substack{uv\in E(\mathcal{G}),\\u\in V(G_{n_1}), v\in I(G_{n_1})}}}2\times 2 +\sum_{{\substack{uv\in E(\mathcal{G}),\\u,v\in V(G_{n_1})}}}2\times 2\\ &= 4m_1+9m_2+9m_3+2n_{1}^{2}-2n_1+6n_1n_2+6m_1n_3. \end{aligned}

    Similarly when G_{n_1} is not a triangle-free graph we get,

    M_2(\mathcal{G})= 9\left(m_1+m_2+m_3+n_1n_2+m_1n_3+\frac{n_1^2-n_1}{2}\right).
Theorem

Theorem 3.5

GDXH

For i= 1,2,3, let G_{n_i} be a graph of order n_i and size m_i, then

  • (i) GA_{4}(\mathcal{G})=\begin{cases} m_1+m_2+m_3+\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{5}(n_1n_2+m_1n_3)+\frac{n_1^2-n_1}{2}, & \text{ifG_n_1is triangle-free}\\m_1+m_2+m_3+n_1n_2+m_1n_3+\frac{n_1^2-n_1}{2}, &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

  • (ii) ABC_{5}(\mathcal{G})= \begin{cases}\frac{2}{3}(m_2+m_3)+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(n_1n_2+m_1n_3+m_1+\frac{n_1(n_1-1)}{2}\right) , & \text{ifG_n_1is triangle-free}\\\frac{2}{3}(m_1+m_2+m_3+n_1n_2+m_1n_3)+\frac{n_1(n_1-1)}{3}, &\text{otherwise}\end{cases}.

Proof of Theorem 3.5
  • (i) Let \mathcal{G}= G_{n_1}^{C}\vee(G_{n_2}^V\cup G_{n_2}^E), where G_{n_1} is triangle-free, then from (6) by using (10) we have

    \begin{aligned} GA_{4}(\mathcal{G})&= \sum_{uv\in E(G_{n_2})}2\frac{\sqrt{3\times 3}}{3+3}+\sum_{uv\in E(G_{n_3})}2\frac{\sqrt{3\times 3}}{3+3}+\sum_{{\substack{u\in V(G_{n_1}),\\ v\in V(G_{n_2})}}}2\frac{\sqrt{2\times 3}}{2+3}\\& +\sum_{{\substack{u\in I(G_{n_1}),\\ v\in V(G_{n_3})}}}2\frac{\sqrt{2\times 3}}{2+3}+\sum_{{\substack{u\in V(G_{n_1}),\\ v\in I(G_{n_1}),\\ uv\in E(\mathcal{G})}}}2\frac{\sqrt{2\times 2}}{2+2}+\sum_{{\substack{uv\in E(\mathcal{G}),\\ u,v\in V(G_{n_1})}}}2\frac{\sqrt{2\times 2}}{2+2}\\ &= m_1+m_2+m_3+\frac{2\sqrt{6}}{5}(n_1n_2+m_1n_3)+\frac{n_1^2-n_1}{2}. \end{aligned}

    Similarly when G_{n_1} is not a triangle-free graph we get,

    GA_{4}(\mathcal{G})= m_1+m_2+m_3+n_1n_2+m_1n_3+\frac{n_1^2-n_1}{2}.
  • (ii) Let G_{n_1} be a triangle-free graph. Then from (7) by using (10) we get

    \scriptsize{ \begin{aligned} ABC_{5}(\mathcal{G})&= \sum_{uv\in E(G_{n_2})}\sqrt{\frac{3+3-2}{3\times 3}}+\sum_{uv\in E(G_{n_3})}\sqrt{\frac{3+3-2}{3\times 3}}+\sum_{{\substack{u\in V(G_{n_1}),\\ v\in V(G_{n_2})}}}\sqrt{\frac{2+3-2}{2\times 3}}\\& +\sum_{{\substack{u\in I(G_{n_1}),\\ v\in V(G_{n_3})}}}\sqrt{\frac{2+3-2}{2\times 3}}+\sum_{{\substack{uv\in E(\mathcal{G}),\\u\in V(G_{n_1}),\\ v\in I(G_{n_1})}}}\sqrt{\frac{2+2-2}{2\times 2}}+\sum_{{\substack{uv\in E(\mathcal{G}) \\ u,v\in V(G_{n_1})}}}\sqrt{\frac{2+2-2}{2\times 2}}\\ &= \frac{2}{3}(m_2+m_3)+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(n_1n_2+m_1n_3+m_1+\frac{n_1(n_1-1)}{2}\right). \end{aligned}}

    Similarly when G_{n_1} is not a triangle-free graph we get,

    ABC_{5}(\mathcal{G})= \frac{2}{3}(m_1+m_2+m_3+n_1n_2+m_1n_3)+\frac{n_1(n_1-1)}{3}.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2210.01497v1 by Haritha T and Chithra A. V., under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2210/2210.01497.jsonl.