For every x_{1} and x_{2} in X,
\begin{aligned}
d(Tx_{1},Tx_{2}) & \leq d(Tx_{1},TSx_{1})+d(TSx_{1},TSx_{2})+d(TSx_{2},Tx_{2}) \\&
\leq d(Tx_{1},TSx_{1})+k d(Tx_{1},Tx_{2})
+d(TSx_{2},Tx_{2}),
\end{aligned}
so
d(Tx_{1},Tx_{2}) \leq
\frac{1}{1-k}[d(Tx_{1},TSx_{1})+d(TSx_{2},Tx_{2})]
Now select x_{0} \in X and define the iterative sequence \{x_{n}\} by x_{n+1}=Sx_{n} (equivalently, x_{n}=S^{n}x_{0}), n=1,2,3,.... By (2.0.1) for any indices m,n \in \Bbb{N},
\begin{aligned}
& d(Tx_{n},Tx_{m})= d(TS^{n}x_{0},TS^{m}x_{0}) \\
& \leq
\frac{1}{1-k}[d(TS^{n}x_{0},TS^{n+1}x_{0})+d(TS^{m+1}x_{0},TS^{m}x_{0})]
\\ & \leq \frac{1}{1-k}[k^{n}d(Tx_{0},TSx_{0})+k^{m}d(TSx_{0},Tx_{0})]
\end{aligned}
hence
d(TS^{n}x_{0},TS^{m}x_{0}) \leq
\frac{k^{n}+k^{m}}{1-k}d(Tx_{0},TSx_{0}).
Relation (2.0.2) and condition 0 < k < 1 show that \{TS^{n}x_{0}\} is a Cauchy sequence, and since X is complete there exists a \in X such that
\underset{n
\rightarrow \infty}\lim TS^{n}x_{0}=a.
Since T is subsequentially convergent \{S^{n}x_{0}\} has a convergent subsequence. So, there exist b \in X and \{n_{k}\}_{k=1}^{\infty} such that \underset{k \rightarrow
\infty}\lim S^{n_{k}}x_{0}=b. Hence, \underset{k \rightarrow
\infty}\lim TS^{n_{k}}x_{0}=Tb, and by (2.0.3), we conclude that
Tb=a.
Since S is continuous and \underset{k \rightarrow \infty}\lim
S^{n_{k}}x_{0}=b, then \underset{k \rightarrow \infty}\lim
S^{n_{k}+1}x_{0}=Sb and so
\underset{k \rightarrow \infty}\lim
TS^{n_{k}+1}x_{0}=TSb.
Again by (2.0.3), \underset{k
\rightarrow \infty}\lim TS^{n_{k}+1}x_{0}=a and therefore TSb=a. Since T is one-to-one and by (2.0.4), Sb=b. So, S has a fixed point.
Since T is one-to-one and S is T-contraction, S has a unique fixed point.