Definition 2.1
2RYPGiven a bounded measurable set E with positive measure, we define PW_E := \{f \in L_2(\mathbb{R}^d) \arrowvert \mathrm{supp}(\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f)) \subset E \}. Functions in PW_E are said to be bandlimited.
In this paper, we investigate frames for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d consisting of exponential functions in connection to oversampling and nonuniform sampling of bandlimited functions. We derive a multidimensional nonuniform oversampling formula for bandlimited functions with a fairly general frequency domain. The stability of said formula under various perturbations in the sampled data is investigated, and a computationally managable simplification of the main oversampling theorem is given. Also, a generalization of Kadec’s 1/4 Theorem to higher dimensions is considered. Finally, the developed techniques are used to approximate biorthogonal functions of particular exponential Riesz bases for L_2[-\pi,\pi], and a well known theorem of Levinson is recovered as a corollary.
Given a bounded measurable set E with positive measure, we define PW_E := \{f \in L_2(\mathbb{R}^d) \arrowvert \mathrm{supp}(\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f)) \subset E \}. Functions in PW_E are said to be bandlimited.
The function \mathrm{sinc}:\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} is defined by \mathrm{sinc}(x) = \frac{\sin(x)}{x}. We also define the multidimensional sinc function \mathrm{SINC}:\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^d by \mathrm{SINC}(x) = \mathrm{sinc}(x_1)\cdot\ldots\cdot\mathrm{sinc}(x_d), x=(x_1,\ldots, x_d).
A sequence (f_n)_n \subset H such that the map L e_n = f_n is an onto isomorphism is called a Riesz basis for H.
A frame for a separable Hilbert space H is a sequence (f_n)_n \subset H such that for some 0<A<B,
A sequence (f_n)_n satisfying the second inequality in equation (2.4) is called a Bessel sequence.
An exact frame is a frame which ceases to be one if any of its elements is removed.
A subset S of \mathbb{R}^d is said to be uniformly separated if
If S=(x_k)_k is a sequence of real numbers and f is a function with S in its domain, then f_{S} denotes the sequence (f(x_k))_k.
Let 0 \in E \subset \mathbb{R}^d be compact such that for all \lambda > 1, E \subset \mathrm{int}(\lambda E). Choose S=(t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that (f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}, defined by f_n(\cdotp) = e^{i \langle \cdotp , t_n \rangle}, is a frame for L_2(E) with frame operator S. Let \lambda_0 >1 with \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g):\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{R}, \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g) \in C^\infty where \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)\arrowvert_{E} = 1 and \mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)\arrowvert_{(\lambda_0 E)^c}=0. If \lambda \geq \lambda_0 and f \in PW_E, then
where B_{kn} = \langle S^{-1}f_n , S^{-1}f_k \rangle_E. Convergence of the sum is in L_2(\mathbb{R}^d), hence also uniform. Further, the map B:\ell_2(\mathbb{N}) \rightarrow \ell_2(\mathbb{N}) defined by (y_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \mapsto \big( \sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} B_{kn} y_n \big)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} is bounded linear, and is an onto isomorphism iff (f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} is a Riesz basis for L_2(E).
Define f_{\lambda,n} (\cdotp) = f_n \big( \frac{\cdotp}{\lambda} \big). Note that (f_{\lambda,n})_n is a frame for L_2(\lambda E) with frame operator S_\lambda.
Step 1: We show that
We know \mathrm{supp}(\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f)) \subset E \subset \lambda E, so we may work with \mathcal{F}^{-1}(f) via its frame decomposition. We have
This yields
since \mathrm{supp}\mathcal{F}(g)\subset \lambda E. Taking Fourier transforms we obtain
Now
which, when substituted into equation (?), yields (Proof).
Step 2: We show that
where convergence is in L_2.
We compute \mathcal{F}[(S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n})\mathcal{F}^{-1}(g)]. For h \in L_2 (\lambda E) we have
Letting h = S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n},
This gives
so (?) follows from (Proof).
Step 3: We show that
First we show (S^{-1}_\lambda f_{\lambda,n})(\cdotp) = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}(S^{-1} f_n)(\frac{\cdotp}{\lambda}), or equivalently that f_{\lambda,n} = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}S_\lambda \big((S^{-1} f_n)(\frac{\cdotp}{\lambda})\big).
We have for any g \in L_2 (\lambda E),
By definition of the frame operator S_\lambda,
which then becomes
Substituting g = \frac{1}{\lambda^d}(S^{-1} f_n)(\frac{\cdotp}{\lambda}) into the equation above we obtain
We now compute the desired inner product:
Note that equation (?) becomes
Step 4: The map V:\ell_2 (\mathbb{N}) \rightarrow \ell_2 (\mathbb{N}) given by x=(x_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \mapsto \big( \sum_n B_{kn} x_n \big)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} = Bx is bounded linear and self-adjoint.
Let (d_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be the standard basis for \ell_2 (\mathbb{N}), and let (e_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an orthonormal basis for L_2(E). Then
where L is the preframe operator, i.e., S =L L^*. Define \phi:\ell^2(\mathbb{N}) \rightarrow L_2(E) by \phi(d_k) = e_k, k \in \mathbb{N}. Clearly \phi is unitary. It follows that V = \phi^{-1} L^* (S^{-1})^2 L \phi, which concludes Step 4. From here on we identify V with B. Clearly B is an onto isomorphism iff L and L^* are both onto, i.e., iff the map L e_n = f_n is an onto isomorphism.
Step 5: Verification of equation (3.1). Recalling Definition 2.8, f_{S/\lambda} = \big( f\big(\frac{t_n}{\lambda}\big) \big)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}; for each t \in \mathbb{R}^d, let g_\lambda (t) = \big( g\big(t-\frac{t_n}{\lambda}\big) \big)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}. Noting that f\big(\frac{\cdot}{\lambda} \big), g\big(t-\frac{\cdot}{\lambda} \big) \in L_2 (\lambda E), and recalling that (f_{\lambda,n})_n is a frame for L_2(\lambda E), we have
and
Note that equation (?) becomes
which proves (3.1).
Step 6: We verify that convergence in equation (3.1) is in L_2 (\mathbb{R}) (hence uniform). Define
and
Then
so
If (h_n)_n is a orthonormal basis for L_2(\lambda E), then the map T h_k = f_{\lambda,k} (the preframe operator) is bounded linear, so
But B f_{S/\lambda} \in \ell^2(\mathbb{N}), so \Arrowvert [\mathcal{F}^{-1}(f_{m,n})] \Arrowvert_2\rightarrow 0 as m,n \rightarrow \infty. As \mathcal{F}^{-1} is an onto isomorphism, we have \Arrowvert f_{m,n} \Arrowvert \rightarrow 0, implying that \Arrowvert f-f_n \Arrowvert \rightarrow 0 as n \rightarrow \infty.
If 0 \in E \subset \mathbb{R}^d is compact, then the following are equivalent:
1) E \subset \mathrm{int}(\lambda E) for all \lambda >1.
2) There exists a continuous map \phi:S^{d-1} \rightarrow (0, \infty) such that E = \{t y \phi(y)|y \in S^{d-1} , t \in [0,1]\}.
Choose (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that (f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}, defined by f_n(\cdotp) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}e^{i \langle \cdotp , t_n \rangle}, is a frame for L_2([-\pi,\pi]^d). If f \in PW_E, then
The matrix B and the convergence of the sum are as in Theorem 3.1.
Let \Lambda \subset \mathbb{R}^d be countable such that
If E is a subset of the closed unit ball in \mathbb{R}^d and E has positive measure, then \{e^{i\langle \cdot , \lambda \rangle} | \lambda \in \Lambda\} is a frame for L_2(E).
Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an enumeration of \mathbb{Z}^d, and S=(t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that
Define e_k,f_k:\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{C} by e_k (x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle} and \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle t_k , x \rangle}, and let (h_k)_k be the standard basis for \ell_2(\mathbb{N}). Let P_l:\ell_2(\mathbb{N}) \rightarrow \ell_2(\mathbb{N}) be the orthogonal projection onto \mathrm{span}\{h_1,\cdots,h_l\}. If (f_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d, then for all f \in PW_{[-\pi,\pi]^d}, we have
where convergence is in L_2 and uniform. Furthermore,
Convergence of the sum is in L_2 and also uniform.
Under the hypotheses of Theorem 5.1,
where convergence of the sum is both L_2 and uniform.
Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an enumeration of \mathbb{Z}^d, and let (t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d. Define e_k,f_k:\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{C} by e_k (x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle} and f_k(x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle t_k , x \rangle}. Then for any r,s\geq 1, and any finite sequence (a_k)_{k=r}^s, we have
Let \delta_k = t_k-n_k where \delta_k = (\delta_{k1}, \cdots , \delta_{kd}). Then
Now for any \delta_k,
where J = \{ (j_1,\cdots, j_d) \in \mathbb{Z}^d |j_i \geq 0, (j_1,\cdots, j_d) \neq 0\}. Then equation (Proof) becomes
so
For brevity denote the outer summand above by h_{j_1 , \ldots ,j_d}(t). Then
so that
Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an enumeration of \mathbb{Z}^d, and let (t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that
Define e_k,f_k:\mathbb{R}^d \rightarrow \mathbb{C} by e_k (x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle n_k , x \rangle} and \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}} e^{i \langle t_k , x \rangle}. Then the map T:L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d \rightarrow L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d, defined by T e_n = e_n - f_n, satisfies the following estimate:
Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}}, (t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d, and let e_k, f_k and T be defined as in Corollary 5.4. For each l \in \mathbb{N}, define T_l by T_l e_k = e_k - f_k for 1 \leq k \leq l, and T_l e_k = 0 for l < k. If \lim_{k \rightarrow\infty} \Arrowvert n_k - t_k \Arrowvert_\infty = 0, then \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} T_l = T in the operator norm. In particular, T is a compact operator.
As
the estimate derived in lemma (5.3) yields
so \big\Arrowvert (T-T_l)\big\Arrowvert_2 \rightarrow 0 as l \rightarrow \infty. As T_l has finite rank, we deduce that T is compact.
Step 1: B is a compact perturbation of the identity map, namely
Since (f_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d, L^* = (I-T) is an onto isomorphism where T e_k = e_k -f_k; so B simplifies to (I-T)^{-1} (I-T^*)^{-1}. We examine
where \Delta is a compact operator. If an operator \Delta:H \rightarrow H is compact then so is \Delta^*, hence P_l \Delta P_l \rightarrow \Delta in the operator norm because
We have
Now (P_l B^{-1} P_l) restricted to the first l rows and columns is the Grammian matrix for the set (f_1,\cdots,f_l) which can be shown (in a straightforward manner) to be linearly independent. We conclude that P_l B^{-1} P_l is invertible as an l \times l matrix. By (P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} we mean the inverse as an l \times l matrix and zeroes elsewhere. Observing that the ranges of P_l B^{-1} P_l and (P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1} are in the kernel of I-P_l, and that the range of I-P_l is in the kernels of P_l B^{-1} P_l and (P_l B^{-1} P_l)^{-1}, we easily compute
so that
implying
Step 2: We verifiy equation (5.1) and its convergence properties. Recalling equation (?), we have
implying
Therefore,
after taking the inverse Fourier transform. Now
since \big(f_k\big(\frac{\cdot}{\lambda}\big)\big)_k is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\lambda\pi, \lambda\pi]^d. Since B_l \rightarrow B as l \rightarrow \infty and \big( f\big(\frac{t_k}{\lambda}\big) \big)_k \in \ell_2(\mathbb{N}), the last two terms in the inequality above tend to zero, which proves the required result.
Finally, to compute (P_l B^{-1} P_l)_{nm}, recall that B^{-1} = (I-T^*)(I-T). Proceeding in a manner similar to the proof of equation (?), we obtain
The entries of P_l B^{-1} P_l agree with those of B^{-1} when 1 \leq n,m \leq l.
Let (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} \subset \mathbb{R} be a sequence of distinct points such that
Then the sequence of functions (f_k)_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}, defined by f_k (x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}e^{i t_k x}, is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi].
Let (n_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} be an enumeration of \mathbb{Z}^d, and let (t_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that
Then the sequence (f_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}} defined by f_k (x) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{d/2}}e^{i \langle x , t_k \rangle} is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d.
Let (a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}^d} \subset \mathbb{R}^d such that
If D_d(L)<1, then \big(\frac{1}{(2 \pi)^d} e^{i \langle a_n , (\cdot) \rangle}\big) is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]^d with frame bounds (1-D_d(L))^2 and (1+D_d(L))^2.
Let x_d be the unique number satisfying 0 < x_d <1/4 and D_d(x_d)=1. Then
A Kadec sequence is a sequence (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} of real numbers satisfying
Let (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}\subset \mathbb{R} be a sequence (with t_n \neq 0 for n \neq 0) such that (f_n)_n = \big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{i t_n (\cdot)} \big)_n is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi], and let (e_n)_n be the standard exponential orthonormal basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]. If the map L given by L e_n = f_n satisfies the estimate \Arrowvert I-L \Arrowvert<1, then the biorthogonals G_n of \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\mathcal{F}(f_n)(\cdot) = \mathrm{sinc}(\pi(\cdot-t_n)) in PW_{[-\pi,\pi]} are
where
We see that \delta_{nm} = \langle G_{l,m} , S_{l,n} \rangle, where S_{l,n} (t) =\mathrm{sinc}(\pi(t-t_n)) when |n| \leq l and S_{l,n} (t) =\mathrm{sinc}(\pi(t-n)) when |m| > l. Without loss of generality, let |m|<l. Equation (?) implies that G_{l,m}(k)=0 when |k|>l. By the WKS theorem we have
where w_l is a polynomial of degree at most 2l. Noting that
we have
Again by equation (?), \delta_{nm} = G_{l,m} (t_n) when |n| \leq l so that
This determines the zeroes of w_l. We deduce that
for some constant c_l. Absorbing constants, we have
where
Now 0 = H_l (t_m), so G_{l,m} (t) = c_l \frac{H_l (t) -H_l (t_m)}{t-t_m}. Taking limits, c_l = \frac{1}{(H_l)'(t_m)}. This yields
Define
Basic complex analysis shows that H is entire, and H_l \rightarrow H and H_l' \rightarrow H' uniformly on compact subsets of \mathbb{C}. Furthermore, H'(t_k) \neq 0 for all k, since each t_k is a zero of H of multiplicity one. Together we have
By the foregoing lemma, G_{l,m} \rightarrow G_m. Observing that convergence in PW_{[-\pi,\pi]} implies pointwise convergence yields the desired result.
Levinson proved a version of Theorem 7.2 in the case where (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} is a Kadec sequence. His original proof is found in [L, pages 47-67]). We recall that if (f_n)_n is a Riesz basis arising from a Kadec sequence, then the preframe operator L satisfies \Arrowvert I-L \Arrowvert <1. Levinson’s theorem is then recovered from Theorem 7.2.
N
AV S. A. Avdonin. On the question of Riesz bases of exponential functions in L^2. Vestnik Leningrad Univ. Ser. Mat., 13, 5-12 (Russian); English translation in Vestnik Leningrad Univ. Math, 7, (1979) 203-211. Ben J. Benedetto, Irregular sampling and frames, Wavelets - A Tutorial in Theory and Applications, C. Chui, Ed., Academic Press, New York, (1991) 1-63. BenH J. Benedetto and W. Heller, Irregular sampling and the theory of frames, Part I, Note Mathematica, Suppl. 1, (1990) 103-125. B J. J. Benedetto, Paulo J. S. G. Ferriera, Modern Sampling Theory, Birkhauser, (2001). Be A. Beurling, Local harmonic analysis with some applications to differential operators, in “Some Recent Advances in the Basic Sciences, Vol. 1” (Proc. Annual Sci. Conf., Belfer Grad. School Sci., Yeshiva Univ., New York, 1962-1964), (1966) 109-125. CA Peter G. Casazza, The Art of Frames, Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 4, No. 2, (2001) 129-201.
DD I. Daubechies, R. DeVore, Approximating a bandlimited function using very coursely quantized data: a family of stable sigma-delta modulators of arbitrary order, Annals of Mathematics 158, (2003) 679-710. DE Duffin. R. J , and Eachus, J. J. Some notes on an expansion theorem of Paley and Wiener. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 44, (1942) 850-855. F G. B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, (1999) 245. Kad Kadec, M. I. The exact value of the Paley-Wiener constant. Sov. Math. Dokl. 5, (1964) 559-561. L N. Levinson, Gap and Density Theorems, American Mathematical Society, (1940). PS H. Pak and C. Shin, Perturbation of Nonharmonic Fourier Series and Nonuniform Sampling Theorem, Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society 44, (2007) No.2, 351-358. SZ W. Sun, and X. Zhou, On the Stability of Multivariate Trigonometric Systems, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 235, (1999) 159-167. Y R. M. Young, An Introduction to Nonharmonic Fourier Series, Academic Press, (1980). Z A. Zayed, Advances in Shannon’s Sampling Theory, CRC Press, (2000).
Let (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}\subset \mathbb{R} be a sequence such that (f_n)_n = \big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} e^{i t_n (\cdot)} \big)_n is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]. If l \geq 0, the l-truncated sequence (t_{l,n})_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} is defined by t_{l,n} = t_n if |n| \leq l and t_{l,n} = n otherwise. Define f_{l,n} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{i t_{l,n}(\cdot)} for n \in \mathbb{Z}, l \geq 0.
Let (t_n)_{n \in \mathbb{Z}}\subset \mathbb{R} be a sequence such that (f_n)_n (defined above) is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi]. If (e_n)_n is the standard exponential orthonormal basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi] and the map L (defined above) satisfies the estimate \Arrowvert I-L \Arrowvert = \delta <1, then the following are true:
1) For l \geq 0 , the sequence (f_{l,n})_n is a Riesz basis for L_2[-\pi,\pi].
2) For l \geq 0, the map L_l defined by L_l e_n = f_{l,n} satisfies \Arrowvert L_l^{-1} \Arrowvert \leq \frac{1}{1-\delta}.
If (c_n)_n \in \ell_2 (\mathbb{Z}), then
so that
From this, \Arrowvert I-L_l \Arrowvert \leq \delta, which implies 1) and 2).
If (t_n)_n \subset \mathbb{R} satisfies the hypotheses of proposition 7.4, then
in PW_{[-\pi,\pi]}.
Note that
so that for all m, f_{l,m}^* = (L_l^*)^{-1}e_m. Similarly, f_m^* = (L^*)^{-1}e_m. We have
Now equation (Proof) implies L-L_l = (L-I)(I-P_l), so that
Applying proposition 7.4 yields
which for fixed m goes to 0 as l \rightarrow \infty. We conclude \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} f_{l,m}^* = f_m^*, which, upon passing to the Fourier transform, yields \lim_{l \rightarrow \infty} G_{l,m} = G_m.
The text on this page is from arXiv:1009.2043v1 by Benjamin Aaron Bailey, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.
The record of each item is in analysis/objects/1009/1009.2043.jsonl.