arXiv reader

A general concept of multiple fixed point for mappings defined on spaces with a distance

Mitrofan M. Choban and Vasile Berinde

arXiv
1701.00517v1 · PDF · 29 December 2016
Categories
math.GM
Licence
CC0 1.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

Our main aim in this paper is to introduce a general concept of multidimensional fixed point of a mapping in spaces with distance and establish various multidimensional fixed point results. This new concept simplifies the similar notion from [A. Roldan, J. Martinez-Moreno, C. Roldan, Multidimensional fixed point theorems in partially ordered complete metric spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 396 (2012), 536–545]. The obtained multiple fixed point theorems extend, generalise and unify many related results in literature.

Items 20

Remark

Remark 2.1

NNGP

If (X, d) is an F-symmetric space, then any convergent sequence is a Cauchy sequence. For N-symmetric spaces and for quasimetric spaces this assertion is not more true.

Remark

Remark 2.2

9K1P

A distance space (X, d) is an H-distance space if and only if any convergent sequence in X has a unique limit point.

Proposition

Proposition 2.3

YCAA

Let (X, d) be a distance space. Then:

1. If d is a symmetric, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) are symmetric spaces, too.

2. If d is a quasimetric, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d^m}) are quasimetric spaces, too.

3. If d is a metric, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) are metric spaces, too.

4. If d is an F-distance space, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) are F-distance spaces, too.

5. If d is an N-distance space, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) are N-distance spaces, too.

6. If d is an H-distance space, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) are H-distance spaces, too.

7. If (X, d) is a C-distance space, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) are C-distance spaces, too.

8. If (X, d) is a complete distance space, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) are complete distance spaces, too.

9. If d is an s-distance space, then (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) are s-distance spaces, too.

10. The spaces (X^m, d^m) and (X^m, \bar{d}^m) share the same convergent sequences and the same Cauchy sequences. Moreover, the distances d^m and \bar{d^m} are uniformly equivalent, i.e., for each \varepsilon > 0, there exists \delta = \delta (\varepsilon ) > 0 such that:

- from d^m(x,y) \leq \delta it follows \bar{d^m}(x,y) \leq \varepsilon;

- from \bar{d^m}(x,y) \leq \delta it follows d^m(x,y) \leq \varepsilon.

Used by Proof
Proof of Proposition 2.3

It is well known.

Proposition

Proposition 3.1

VQ99

Let (X, d) be a distance space, m \in \mathbb N, F: X^m \rightarrow X be an operator, \lambda=\{\lambda _i: \{1, 2, ..., m\} \longrightarrow \{1, 2, ..., m\}: 1\leq i \leq m\} be a collection of mappings, k \geq 0, a = (a_1,....,a_m) \in X^m, b = (b_1,....,b_m) \in X^m such that

d(F(a_{\lambda _i(1)},....,a_{\lambda _i(m)}),F(b_{\lambda _i(1)},....,b_{\lambda _i(m)})) \leq k \sup \{d(a_i,b_i): i \leq m\},

for each 1\leq i \leq m. Then d^m(\lambda F(a), \lambda F(b)) \leq k d^m(a,b).

Used by Proof
Proof of Proposition 3.1

Let u_i = F(a_{\lambda _i(1)},....,a_{\lambda _i(m)}) and v_i = F(b_{\lambda _i(1)},....,b_{\lambda _i(m)}) for any i \leq m. Then \lambda F(a) = u = (u_1, ..., u_m) and \lambda F(b) = v = (v_1, ..., v_m). We have d^m(\lambda F(a), \lambda F(b)) = d^m(u, v) = \sup \{d(u_i,v_i): i \leq m\} = \sup \{d(F(a_{\lambda _i(1)}, ..., a_{\lambda _i(m)}), F(b_{\lambda _i(1)}, ..., b_{\lambda _i(m)})): i \leq m\} \leq \sup \{ k \sup\{d(a_{\lambda _i(j)}, b_{\lambda _i(j)}): j \leq m\}: i \leq m\} \leq k \sup \{d(a_i, b_i): i \leq m\} = k d^m(a, b).

Corollary

Corollary 3.2

08JV

Let (X, d) be a distance space m \in \mathbb N and F: X^m \rightarrow X be an operator. If F is a \lambda-contraction, then \lambda F is a contraction on the distance space (X^m, d^m).

Proposition

Proposition 3.3

C0XQ

Let (X, d) be a distance space, m \in \mathbb N and F: X^m \rightarrow X be an operator, \{\lambda _i: \{1, 2, ..., m\} \longrightarrow \{1, 2, ..., m\}: 1\leq i \leq m\} be a collection of mappings, k \geq 0, a = (a_1,....,a_m) \in X^m, b = (b_1,....,b_m) \in X^m such that

d(F(a_{\lambda _i(1)},....,a_{\lambda _i(m)}),F(b_{\lambda _i(1)},....,b_{\lambda _i(m)})) \leq k/m \sum_{i=1}^{m} d(a_i,b_i),

for each i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\}. If the mapping \lambda _i is a surjection or, more generally, if |\cup \{\lambda _i^{-1}(j): j \leq m\}| = m for each i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\}, then

\bar{d}^m(\lambda F(a), \lambda F(b)) \leq k \bar{d}^m(a,b).
Used by Proof
Proof of Proposition 3.3

We put u =(u_1,....,u_m) = \lambda F(a) and v =(v_1,....,v_m) = \lambda F(b). Then

\bar{d}^m(\lambda F(a), \lambda F(b)) = \sum_{i=1}^{m} d(u_i,v_i) =
=\sum_{i=1}^{m} d(F(a_{\lambda _i(1)}, ..., a_{\lambda _i(m)}),F(b_{\lambda _i(1)}, ..., b_{\lambda _i(m)})) \leq
\leq \sum_{i=1}^{m} k/m \sum_{j=1}^{m} d(a_{\lambda _i(j)}, b_{\lambda _i(j)})\leq k \sum_{i=1}^{m} d(a_i, b_i)=k \bar{d}^m(a, b).
Corollary

Corollary 3.4

PQFS

Let (X, d) be a distance space, m \in \mathbb N and F: X^m \rightarrow X be an operator. If F is a \bar{\lambda }-contraction and for any i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\} the mapping \lambda _i is a surjection or, more generally, |\cup \{\lambda _i^{-1}(j): j \leq m\}| = m for each i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\}, then \lambda F is a contraction on the distance space (X^m, \bar{d}^m).

Proposition

Proposition 4.1

S4K4

Let (X, d) be a C-distance space. Then:

1. d(x,y) = 0 if and only if x= y.

2. If, for a \in X^m, the Picard sequence O(F,\lambda ,a) = \{a(n): n \in \mathbb N\} is a convergent Cauchy sequence and lim_{n\rightarrow \infty }a_n = b = (b_1, ..., b_m), then b is a multidimensional fixed point of the operator F with respect to the mappings \lambda, i.e.,

b_i = F(b_{\lambda _i(1)}, ..., b_{\lambda _i(m)}) \textnormal{ for each } i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\}.
Proof of Proposition 4.1

Assume that x, y are two distinct points of X and d(x,y) = 0. Then the points x, y are both limits of the Cauchy sequence \{y_n = y: n \in \mathbb N\}, a contradiction. So, assertion 1 is proved.

In the conditions of assertion 2, we have \lambda F(b) = b.

Corollary

Corollary 4.2

CSS2

Let (X, d) be a complete C-distance space, \rho \in \{d^m, \bar{d}^m\}, k > 0 and F : X^m \longrightarrow X be an operator with the following properties:

  1. there exists k > 0 such that d(F(x), F(y)) < k \rho (x,y) for all distinct points x, y \in X^m;

  2. if x \in X^m, then the Picard sequence \{x_n \in X: n \in \mathbb N\}, of F at the point x, is a Cauchy sequence.

Then:

1. The operators F and \lambda F are continuous.

2. The set Fix (F) of the multidimensional fixed points of F is closed in X^m and non-empty.

3. If k \leq 1, then F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

Theorem

Theorem 4.3

BNM5

Let (X, d) be a (F,\lambda )-bounded complete C-distance space and F : X^m \longrightarrow X be an operator.

1. If F is a \lambda-contraction, then any Picard sequence of the operator \lambda F is a convergent Cauchy sequence and F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

2. If F is a \bar{\lambda }-contraction and for any i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\} the mapping \lambda _i is a surjection or, more generally, |\cup \{\lambda _i^{-1}(j): j \leq n\}| = m for each i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\}, then any Picard sequence of the operator \lambda F is a convergent Cauchy sequence and F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

Used by Proof, Proof
Proof of Theorem 4.3

Let \rho = d^m in the conditions of Assertion 1 and \rho = \bar{d^m} in the conditions of Assertion 2. From Propositions 3.1 and 3.3, respectively, it follows that \lambda F is a contraction on the complete C-distance space (X^m, \rho ). Proposition 3.4 from [C1] ensures that the operator \lambda F has a unique fixed point which is a multidimensional fixed point of F.

Theorem

Theorem 4.4

ELF0

Let (X, d) be an N-symmetric space and F : X^m \longrightarrow X be an operator.

1. If F is a \lambda-contractive operator and for each point x \in X^m the Picard sequence O(F,\lambda , x) = \{x_n : n \in \mathbb N\} has an accumulation point and \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow \infty }d^m(x_n,x_{n+1}) = 0, then any Picard sequence of the operator \lambda F is a convergent Cauchy sequence and F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

2. If F is a \bar{\lambda }-contractive operator and, for any i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\}, the mapping \lambda _i is a surjection or, more generally, |\cup \{\lambda _i^{-1}(j): j \leq m\}| = m for each i \in \{1, 2, ..., m\} and for each point x \in X^m the Picard sequence O(F,\lambda , x) = \{x_n: n \in \mathbb N\} has an accumulation point and \lim\limits_{n\rightarrow \infty }\bar{d^m}(x_n,x_{n+1}) = 0, then any Picard sequence of the operator \lambda F is a convergent Cauchy sequence and F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

3. d is an H-distance and any Picard sequence has a unique accumulation point.

Proof of Theorem 4.4

Assertion 3 follows immediately from Theorem 4.1 from [C1]. Let \rho be the symmetric constructed in the proof of Theorem 4.3. Then \lambda F is a strongly asymptotically regular contractive mapping on the N-symmetric space (X^m, \rho ) and, for each point x \in X^m, the Picard sequence O(F, \lambda , x) has an accumulation point. Now, Theorem 4.1 from [C1] completes the proof.

Corollary

Corollary 4.5

M2XE

Let (X, d) be an N-symmetric compact space and F : X^m \longrightarrow X be an operator.

1. If F is a \lambda-contraction, then any Picard sequence of the operator \lambda F is a convergent Cauchy sequence and F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

2. If F is a \bar{\lambda }-contraction and for any i \leq m the mapping \lambda _i is a surjection or, more generally, |\cup \{\lambda _i^{-1}(j): j \leq m\}| = m, for each i \leq m, then any Picard sequence of the operator \lambda F is a convergent Cauchy sequence and F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

Theorem

Theorem 4.6

1XZG

Let (X, d) be a complete s-distance symmetric space and F : X^m \longrightarrow X be an operator.

1. If F is a \lambda-contraction, then any Picard sequence of the operator \lambda F is a convergent Cauchy sequence and F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

2. If F is a \bar{\lambda }-contraction and, for any i \leq m, the mapping \lambda _i is a surjection or, more generally, |\cup \{\lambda _i^{-1}(j): j \leq m\}| = m, for each i \leq m, then any Picard sequence of the operator \lambda F is a convergent Cauchy sequence and F has a unique multidimensional fixed point.

Proof of Theorem 4.6

Let \rho be the symmetric constructed in the proof of Theorem 4.3. By virtue of Proposition 2.3, \rho is a symmetric s-distance. Then \lambda F is a contractive mapping of the s-symmetric space (X^m, \rho ). Now, Theorem 4.2 from [C1] completes the proof.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:1701.00517v1 by Mitrofan M. Choban and Vasile Berinde, under the licence CC0 1.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/1701/1701.00517.jsonl.