arXiv reader

Heat coefficients for magnetic Laplacians on the complex projective space \mathbf{P}^{n}(\mathbb{C})

K. Ahbli, A. Hafoud and Z. Mouayn

arXiv
2202.02160v1 · PDF · 4 February 2022
Categories
math-ph, math.MP
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

Denoting by \Delta_\nu the Fubini-Study Laplacian perturbed by a uniform magnetic field strength proportional to \nu, this operator has a discrete spectrum consisting on eigenvalues \beta_m, \ m\in\mathbb{Z}_+, when acting on bounded functions of the complex projective n-space. For the corresponding eigenspaces, we give a new proof for their reproducing kernels by using Zaremba’s expansion directly. These kernels are then used to obtain an integral representation for the heat kernel of \Delta_\nu. Using a suitable polynomial decomposition of the multiplicity of each \beta_m, we write down a trace formula for the heat operator associated with \Delta_\nu in terms of Jacobi’s theta functions and their higher order derivatives. Doing so enables us to establish the asymptotics of this trace as t\searrow 0^+ by giving the corresponding heat coefficients in terms of Bernoulli numbers and polynomials. The obtained results can be exploited in the analysis of the spectral zeta function associated with \Delta_\nu.

Items 8

Lemma

Lemma 1

1V3W

The functions (?) satisfy

\begin{split} \sum_{p=0}^{m}\sum_{q=0}^{m+2\nu }\sum_{j=1}^{d(n,p,q)}\Phi _{m,p,q}^{j}(z) \overline{\Phi _{m,p,q}^{j}(w)}&=\frac{(2m+2\nu +n)\Gamma (m+2\nu +n)}{\pi ^{n}\Gamma (m+2\nu +1)}\left( \frac{\left( 1+\langle w,z\rangle \right) ^{2} }{(1+|z|^{2})(1+|w|^{2})}\right) ^{\nu } \\ &\times P_{m}^{(n-1,2\nu )}\left( \frac{2|1+\langle z,w\rangle |^{2}}{ (1+|z|^{2})(1+|w|^{2})}-1\right) , \end{split}

for every z,w\in \mathbb{C}^{n}.

Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 1

Denoting the sum in the l.h.s of (1) by K_{\nu ,m}(z,w) and replacing the orthonormal basis (?) of \mathcal{A}_m^\nu by their expressions, we obtain

\begin{split} K_{\nu ,m}(z,w)&=\left( (1+\left\langle z,z\right\rangle )\left( 1+\left\langle w,w\right\rangle \right) \right) ^{-\nu -m}\sum_{\substack{ 1\leq j\leq d(n,p,q) \\ 0\leq p\leq m,\ 0\leq q\leq m+2\nu }}\left( \gamma _{p,q}^{n,\nu ,m}\right) ^{2}h_{p,q}^{j}(z,\bar{z})\overline{h_{p,q}^{j}(w, \bar{w})} \\ &\times _{2}F{}_{1}\left( \begin{array}{c} p-m,q-m-2\nu \\ n+p+q \end{array} \big|-\left\langle z,z\right\rangle \right) {}_{2}F{}_{1}\left( \begin{array}{c} p-m,q-m-2\nu \\ n+p+q \end{array} \big|-\left\langle w,w\right\rangle \right) \end{split}

which can also be written as

\begin{split} K_{\nu ,m}(z,w)& =\left( (1+\left\langle z,z\right\rangle )\left( 1+\left\langle w,w\right\rangle \right) \right) ^{-\nu -m}\sum_{p=0}^{m}\sum_{q=0}^{m+2\nu }\left( \gamma _{p,q}^{n,\nu ,m}\right) ^{2}\mathfrak{S}_{n;p,q}^{z,w} \\ & \times {}_{2}F{}_{1}\left( \begin{array}{c} p-m,q-m-2\nu \\ n+p+q \end{array} \big|-\left\langle z,z\right\rangle \right) {}_{2}F{}_{1}\left( \begin{array}{c} p-m,q-m-2\nu \\ n+p+q \end{array} \big|-\left\langle w,w\right\rangle \right) \end{split}

where

\begin{split} \mathfrak{S}_{n;p,q}^{z,w}&:=\sum_{\substack{ 1\leq j\leq d(n,p,q)}} h_{p,q}^{j}(z,\bar{z})\overline{h_{p,q}^{j}(w,\bar{w})} \\ &=\left( |z||w|\right) ^{p+q}\sum_{\substack{ 1\leq j\leq d(n,p,q)}} h_{p,q}^{j}\left( \frac{z}{|z|},\frac{\bar{z}}{|z|}\right) \overline{ h_{p,q}^{j}\left( \frac{w}{|w|},\frac{\bar{w}}{|w|}\right) }. \end{split}

As usual, in the spherical harmonics setting, this last sum can be computed via the Koornwinder’s formula [Koor_1972] as

\mathfrak{S}_{n;p,q}^{z,w}=\frac{\Gamma (n)d(n,p,q)}{2\pi ^{n}}\left( |z||w|\right) ^{p+q}\left\vert \left\langle \frac{z}{|z|},\frac{w}{|w|} \right\rangle \right\vert ^{\left\vert p-q\right\vert }e^{i\left( p-q\right) \arg \left( \left\langle \frac{z}{|z|},\frac{w}{|w|}\right\rangle \right) } \frac{P_{\min \left( p,q\right) }^{(n-2,\left\vert p-q\right\vert )}\left( 2\left\vert \left\langle \frac{z}{|z|},\frac{w}{|w|}\right\rangle \right\vert ^{2}-1\right) }{P_{\min \left( p,q\right) }^{(n-2,\left\vert p-q\right\vert )}(1)}.

Now, using the notation R_{p,q}^{\gamma }(\xi ) in (?), \mathfrak{S}_{n;p,q}^{z,w} also reads

\mathfrak{S}_{n;p,q}^{z,w}=(2\pi ^{n})^{-1}\Gamma (n)d(n,p,q)(|z||w|)^{p+q}R_{p,q}^{n-2}\left( \left\langle \frac{z}{|z|}, \frac{w}{|w|}\right\rangle \right) .

On the other hand, we also need to write the terminating Gauss hypergeometric functions _{2}F{}_{1} in (Proof) in terms of Zernike polynomials (?). For that, we use (?) to obtain

{}_{2}F{}_{1}\left( \begin{array}{c} p-m,q-m-2\nu \\ n+p+q \end{array} \big|-|z|^{2}\right) =\left( 1+|z|^{2}\right) ^{m+\nu -\frac{p+q}{2} }R_{m-p,m-q+2\nu }^{n+p+q-1}\left( \left( 1+|z|^{2}\right) ^{-\frac{1}{2} }\right) .

Now, by replacing (Proof) and (Proof) in (Proof), the sum (Proof) takes the form

\begin{split} K_{\nu ,m}(z,w)& =\sum_{p=0}^{m}\sum_{q=0}^{m+2\nu }\left[ (2\pi ^{n})^{-1}\Gamma (n)\left( \gamma _{p,q}^{n,\nu ,m}\right) ^{2}\right] d(n,p,q)\left( \frac{\left( |z||w|\right) ^{2}}{\left( 1+|z|^{2}\right) \left( 1+|w|^{2}\right) }\right) ^{\frac{1}{2}\left( p+q\right) } \\ & \times R_{m-p,m-q+2\nu }^{n+p+q-1}\left( \left( 1+|z|^{2}\right) ^{-\frac{1 }{2}}\right) R_{m-p,m-q+2\nu }^{n+p+q-1}\left( \left( 1+|w|^{2}\right) ^{- \frac{1}{2}}\right) R_{p,q}^{n-2}\left( \left\langle \frac{z}{|z|},\frac{w}{ |w|}\right\rangle \right) \end{split}

with

(2\pi ^{n})^{-1}\Gamma (n)\left( \gamma _{p,q}^{n,\nu ,m}\right) ^{2}=\beta _{\nu ,n,m}\frac{(-1)^{p+q}(-m)_{p}(-m-2\nu )_{q}(n+m+2\nu )_{p}(n+m)_{q}}{ (n)_{p+q}(n)_{p+q}},

where the constant

\beta _{\nu ,n,m}=\frac{(2m+2\nu +n)\Gamma (n+m)\Gamma (n+m+2\nu )}{\pi ^{n}\Gamma (n)m!(m+2\nu )!}

was obtained by using identities (?) and (?). Therefore, (Proof) becomes

\begin{split} K_{\nu ,m}(z,w)& =\beta _{\nu ,n,m}\sum_{\substack{ 0\leq p\leq m \\ 0\leq q\leq m+2\nu }}\frac{(-1)^{p+q}(-m)_{p}(-m-2\nu )_{q}(n+m+2\nu )_{p}(n+m)_{q} }{(d(n,p,q))^{-1}(n)_{p+q}(n)_{p+q}}\left( \frac{|z|^{2}|w|^{2}}{ (1+|z|^{2})(1+|w|^{2})}\right) ^{\frac{p+q}{2}} \\ & \times R_{m-p,m-q+2\nu }^{n+p+q-1}\left( \left( 1+|z|^{2}\right) ^{-\frac{1 }{2}}\right) R_{m-p,m-q+2\nu }^{n+p+q-1}\left( \left( 1+|w|^{2}\right) ^{- \frac{1}{2}}\right) R_{p,q}^{n-2}\left( \left\langle \frac{z}{|z|},\frac{w}{ |w|}\right\rangle \right) . \end{split}

We now are in position to apply the addition formula for Zernike polynomials due to Šapiro [Sapiro1968] and Koornwinder [Koorn1972]:

\begin{split} R_{k,l}^{\gamma }\left( z_{1}\bar{z}_{2}+(1-z_{1}\bar{z}_{1})^{\frac{1}{2} }(1-z_{2}\bar{z}_{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}y\right) & =\sum_{p=0}^{k}\sum_{q=0}^{l}\tau_{p,q,\gamma -1}\frac{ (-1)^{p+q}(-k)_{p}(-l)_{q}(l+\gamma +1)_{p}(k+\gamma +1)_{q}}{(\gamma +1)_{p+q}(\gamma +1)_{p+q}} \\ & \times \left[ (1-z_{1}\bar{z}_{1})(1-z_{2}\bar{z}_{2})\right] ^{\frac{p+q}{ 2}}R_{k-p,l-q}^{\gamma +p+q}(z_{1})\overline{R_{k-p,l-q}^{\gamma +p+q}(z_{2}) }R_{p,q}^{\gamma -1}(y), \end{split}

where

\tau_{p,q,\gamma}:=\frac{(p+q+\gamma +1)(\gamma +1)_{p}(\gamma +1)_{q}}{ (\gamma +1)p!q!}.

Indeed, we specialize this formula for z_{1}=\left( 1+|z|^{2}\right)^{- \frac{1}{2}}, \, z_2=\left( 1+|w|^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}},\ y=\left\langle \frac{z}{|z|},\frac{w}{|w|}\right\rangle ,\ k=m, \ l=m+2\nu, and \gamma =n-1 to obtain, after replacement, the expression

K_{\nu ,m}(z,w)=\beta _{\nu ,n,m}R_{m,m+2\nu }^{n-1}\left( \frac{1+\langle z,w\rangle }{(1+|z|^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}(1+|w|^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}}\right) .

Using again (?), equation (Proof) can be rewritten as:

K_{\nu ,m}(z,w)=\frac{(2m+2\nu +n)\Gamma (m+2\nu +n)}{\pi ^{n}\Gamma (m+2\nu +1)}\left( \frac{\left( 1+\langle w,z\rangle \right) ^{2}}{ (1+|z|^{2})(1+|w|^{2})}\right) ^{\nu }P_{m}^{(n-1,2\nu )}\left( \frac{ 2|1+\langle z,w\rangle |^{2}}{(1+|z|^{2})(1+|w|^{2})}-1\right).

Recalling (?), we may also write (Proof) in the form (1). This ends the proof.

Remark

Remark 2

9KHO

For \nu =0, the Fubini-Study Laplacian \Delta _{0}\equiv\Delta _{FS} has a discrete spectral decomposition with eigenvalues \beta_m =(-4m(m+n))_{m\geq 0}. Besides, each eigenspace is finite-dimensional and has a orthonormal basis given by homogeneous spherical harmonics of degree zero. Setting \nu =0 in (?), then the kernel of the orthogonal projection from L^{2}(\mathbb{C}^{n},d\mu _{n}) onto the m-th eigenspace of \Delta_{0} reduces to

K_{0,m}(z,w)=\pi ^{-n}\left( 2m+n\right) \frac{(m+n-1)!}{m!} P_{m}^{(n-1,0)}(\cos 2d_{FS}(z,w)),

in agreement with the result of Koornwinder [Koo, Theorem 3.8].

Remark

Remark 3

OQLS

For \nu =0, the spectral theorem implies that for any suitable function U, the operator U(\Delta_{0}) is an integral operator whose kernel is given by

\sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty }U(-4m(m+n))K_{0,m}(z,w).

In particular, one can write the kernel of the heat semigroup \exp\left(t\Delta _{0}\right) through the series expansion

H_{0}\left( t;z,w\right) =\pi ^{-n}\sum_{m\geq 0}\left( 2m+n\right) \frac{ (m+n-1)!}{m!}e^{-4m(m+n)t}P_{m}^{(n-1,0)}(\cos 2d_{FS}(z,w)),

see [HI2002, p.873].

Theorem

Theorem 4

9TT9

Let n\geq 1, 2\nu \in\mathbb{Z}_+ and \rho =d_{FS}(z,w). Then,

\begin{split} H_{\nu }(t,z,w)&=\frac{e^{4t(\nu ^{2}+\frac{n^{2}}{4})}}{2^{n+2\nu -1}\pi ^{n}\Gamma \left( 2\nu +\frac{1}{2}\right) }\left( \frac{(1+\langle z,z\rangle )(1+\langle w,w\rangle )}{(1+\langle z,w\rangle )^{2}}\right) ^{\nu }\\ &\times \int_{\rho }^{\frac{\pi }{2}}\frac{-d(\cos u)}{\left( \cos ^{2}\rho -\cos ^{2}u\right) ^{\frac{1}{2}-2\nu }}\left( -\frac{1}{\sin u}\frac{d}{du} \right) ^{n+2\nu }\left[ \Theta _{n+1,\nu }(t,u)\right] \end{split}

where

\Theta _{n+1,\nu }(t,u):=\sum_{m=0}^{\infty }e^{-4t(m+\nu +\frac{n}{2} )^{2}}\cos (2m+2\nu +n)u.
Proof of Theorem 4

We first write the heat kernel in terms of the reproducing kernel (1) as follows

\begin{split} \quad H_{\nu }(t,z,w)&=\sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty }e^{\beta_{m}t}K_{\nu,m}(z,w)\\ &=\sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty }e^{\beta_{m}t}\frac{(2m+2\nu +n)\Gamma (m+2\nu +n)}{\pi^{n}\Gamma (m+2\nu +1)}\left( \frac{\left( 1+\langle w,z\rangle \right) ^{2}}{(1+|z|^{2})(1+|w|^{2})}\right) ^{\nu } \\ & \qquad\qquad\qquad\times P_{m}^{(n-1,2\nu )}\left( \frac{2|1+\langle z,w\rangle |^{2}}{(1+|z|^{2})(1+|w|^{2})}-1\right) . \end{split}

Next, we will use the integral representation for Jacobi polynomials in terms of Gegenbauer polynomials given in [DK1971, p.194] followed by the symmetry relation P_{k}^{(\alpha ,\beta )}(-x)=(-1)^{k}P_{k}^{(\beta ,\alpha )}(x),

P_{k}^{(\alpha ,\beta )}(2t^{2}-1)=\frac{2\Gamma (\alpha +\beta +1)\Gamma (k+\beta +1)}{\Gamma (\beta +\frac{1}{2})\Gamma (k+\alpha +\beta +1)} \int_{0}^{1}(1-u^{2})^{\beta -\frac{1}{2}}C_{2k}^{\alpha +\beta +1}(tu)du,

Re\alpha >-\frac{1}{2},\ Re\beta >-\frac{1}{2} and |t|<1. Precisely, we set t=\cos \rho and u=\cos \psi /\cos \rho, then we specialize \alpha =n-1,\ \beta =2\nu and k=m in (Proof) to get that

P_{m}^{(n-1 ,2\nu )}(\cos 2\rho)=\frac{2\Gamma (n+2\nu )\Gamma (m+2\nu +1)}{\Gamma (2\nu +\frac{1}{2})\Gamma (m+2\nu +n)}\frac{1}{\cos ^{4\nu }\rho} \int_{\rho}^{\frac{\pi }{2}}\frac{\sin \psi }{\left( \cos ^{2}\rho-\cos ^{2}\psi \right) ^{\frac{1}{2}-2\nu }}C_{2m}^{n+2\nu }(\cos \psi )d\psi .

By substituting the above representation in (Proof), we obtain, after some calculations, the following

\begin{split} H_{\nu }(t,z,w)& =\frac{2\Gamma (n+2\nu )e^{4t(\nu^2+\frac{n^2}{4})} }{\Gamma (2\nu +\frac{1}{2})\cos ^{4\nu }\rho}D_{\nu }(z,w) \\ & \times \int_{\rho}^{\frac{\pi }{2}}\frac{\sin \psi }{\left( \cos ^{2}\theta -\cos ^{2}\psi \right) ^{\frac{1}{2}-2\nu }}\left( \sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty }(2m+2\nu +n)C_{2m}^{n+2\nu }(\cos \psi )e^{-4t(m+\nu +\frac{n}{2})^2}\right) d\psi , \end{split}

where

D_{\nu }(z,w):=\left(\frac{(1+\langle w,z\rangle )^2\cos^{-4}\rho}{(1+|z|^{2})(1+|w|^{2})} \right)^{\nu }.

Next, we use the formula [HI2002, p.876]:

\left( -\frac{d}{\sin udu}\right) ^{l}\left( \frac{\sin (k+l+1)u}{\sin u} \right) =2^{l}l!C_{k}^{l+1}(\cos u),

for l=n+2\nu ,\ k=2m,\ u=\psi to rewrite the series occurring in (Proof) as

\frac{2^{1-n-2\nu }}{(n+2\nu -1)!}\left( -\frac{d}{\sin \psi d\psi } \right) ^{n-1+2\nu }\left( \sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty }\frac{(2m+2\nu +n)\sin (2m+2\nu +n)\psi }{\sin \psi }e^{-4t(m+\nu +\frac{n}{2})^2}\right) .

But since

\frac{(2m+2\nu +n)\sin (2m+2\nu +n)\psi }{\sin \psi }=-\frac{d}{\sin \psi d\psi }(\cos (2m+2\nu +n)\psi ).

Equation (Proof) may be presented as

\frac{2^{1-n-2\nu }}{(n+2\nu -1)!}\left( -\frac{d}{\sin \psi d\psi } \right) ^{n+2\nu }\left[ \Theta _{n+1,\nu }(t,\psi )\right]

where

\Theta _{n+1,\nu }(t,\psi )=\sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty}e^{-4t(m+\nu +\frac{n}{2})^2}\cos (2m+2\nu+n)\psi.

Finally, by substituting (Proof) into (Proof) we arrive at the announced result (4).

Uses Lemma 1
Theorem

Theorem 5

04SQ

The heat trace formula (?) satisfies the asymptotic expansion

Tr\left( \exp\left(\frac{1}{4}t\Delta _{\nu }\right)\right) \simeq \frac{1}{(4\pi t)^{n}} \sum\limits_{j=0}^{+\infty }b_{j}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }\ t^{j},\text{ \ \ }t\searrow 0^{+}

with the heat coefficients given by

b_{j}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }=\frac{(4\pi)^n}{n!} \sum\limits_{i=0}^{j}\frac{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) ^{j-i}}{\left( j-i\right) !}c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) },\text{ \ }
  • (i) case n odd

    c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }=\left\{ \begin{array}{c} \frac{(n-i-1)!}{(n-1)!}\gamma _{n-i-1}^{(\nu ,n)},\quad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad 0\leq i\leq n-1 \\ \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{i-n+1}c_{p}^{\left( \nu ,n\right)}}{(i-n)!(i-p)p!} B_{2(i-p)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right) ,\quad i\geq n \end{array} \right.
  • (ii) case n even

    \begin{aligned} \begin{split} c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }=\left\{ \begin{array}{c} 1,\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad i=0\\ \tau _{n-1-i}^{(\nu ,n)}\frac{\left(n-i-1\right) !}{\left( n-1\right) !},\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad 1\leq i\leq n-1\\ \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{i-n}c_{p}^{\left( \nu ,n\right)}}{(i-n)!(i-p)(n-p-1)!}\left[ 2B_{2(i-p)}-B_{2(i-p)}(\nu)\right] ,\qquad i\geq n \end{array} \right. \end{split} \end{aligned}

where B_d and B_d(\cdot) denote Bernoulli numbers and polynomials respectively (see Appendix ?). The coefficients \tau _{i}^{(\nu ,n)} and \gamma_{i}^{(\nu ,n)} are defined by (?) and (?) respectively.

Uses Proof
Proof of Theorem 5

We may rewrite (?) as

\dim _{\mathbb{C}}\mathcal{A}_{m}^{\nu }=\frac{2m+n+2\nu }{n!(n-1)!} \prod\limits_{j=1}^{n-1}(m+j)(m+2\nu +j) .

Setting r=r\left( m\right) =m+\nu +\frac{n}{2}, the product in (Proof) also reads

\mathcal{\wp }=\prod\limits_{j=1}^{n-1}\left( r-\frac{n}{2}-\nu +j\right) \left( r-\frac{n}{ 2}+\nu +j\right) .

We treat the cases of n odd and n even separately as they correspond to different choices of theta functions.

\left( i\right) Case odd n\geq 0. The product (Proof) can also be presented as

\mathcal{\wp }=\prod\limits_{l=\frac{1}{2}+\nu }^{\frac{n}{2}+\nu -1}\left( r^{2}-l^{2}\right) \prod\limits_{s=\frac{1}{2}-\nu }^{\frac{n}{2}-\nu -1}\left( r^{2}-s^{2}\right)

and further it can be decomposed as

\mathcal{\wp }=\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}r^{2p}.

where the numbers \gamma _{0}^{(\nu ,n)},...,\gamma _{n-1}^{(\nu ,n)} can be computed explicitly (see Sect.?). By using (?), the multiplicity in (Proof) takes the form

\dim _{\mathbb{C}}\mathcal{A}_{m}^{\nu }=\frac{2}{n!(n-1)!} \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left( m+\nu +\frac{n}{2} \right) ^{2p+1}

which we may use to rewrite the trace formula (?) as

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} Tr\left( e^{\frac{1}{4}t\Delta _{\nu }}\right) &=e^{\left( \frac{n^{2} }{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}\sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty }\left[ \frac{2}{n!(n-1)!} \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left( m+\nu +\frac{n}{2} \right) ^{2p+1}\right] e^{-\left( m+\frac{n}{2}+\nu \right) ^{2}t} \\ &=\frac{e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\mathcal{S} \end{split} \end{aligned}

with

\mathcal{S}:=\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left( 2\sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty }\left( m+\nu +\frac{n}{2}\right) ^{2p+1}e^{-\left( m+\frac{n}{2}+\nu \right) ^{2}t}\right) .

The latter sum can be cast into two parts as

\mathcal{S}=2\sum\limits_{\mu =\nu +\frac{1}{2}}^{+\infty }\mu e^{-\mu ^{2}t}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mu ^{2p}-2\sum\limits_{\mu =\nu +\frac{1}{2}}^{\nu +\frac{n}{2}-1}\mu e^{-\mu ^{2}t}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mu ^{2p}

Recalling (?)-(?), we see that for \mu raining over the set \{\nu +\frac{1}{2},\nu +\frac{3}{2},\cdots ,\nu +\frac{n}{2}-1\} the sum

\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mu ^{2p}=0

and therefore the sum (?) reduces to

\mathcal{S}=2\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mathcal{R} _{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( t\right)

where

\mathcal{R}_{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( t\right) =\sum\limits_{\mu =\nu + \frac{1}{2}}^{+\infty }\mu ^{2p+1}e^{-\mu ^{2}t}

By setting \mu =j+\frac{1}{2}, we successively obtain

\begin{aligned} \mathcal{R}_{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( t\right) &=\sum\limits_{j=\nu }^{+\infty }\left( j+\frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2p+1}e^{-\left( j+\frac{1}{2} \right) ^{2}t} \\ &=\sum\limits_{j=0}^{+\infty }\left( j+\frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2p+1}e^{-\left( j+ \frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2}t}-\sum\limits_{j=0}^{\nu -1}\left( j+\frac{1}{2} \right) ^{2p+1}e^{-\left( j+\frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2}t} \\ &=\frac{1}{2}\left( -\frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{p}\left[ \sum\limits_{j=0}^{+ \infty }\left( 2j+1\right) e^{-\left( j+\frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2}t}\right] -\sum\limits_{j=0}^{\nu -1}\left( j+\frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2p+1}e^{-\left( j+ \frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2}t} \\ &=\frac{1}{2}\left( -\frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{p}\left[ \vartheta _{2}(t)\right] -\sum\limits_{j=0}^{\nu -1}\left( j+\frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2p+1}e^{-\left( j+ \frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2}t} \end{aligned}

where \vartheta _{2}(t) denotes the Jacobi’s theta function given by [M_1928, p.280]:

\vartheta _{2}(t)=\sum\limits_{j=0}^{+\infty }\left( 2j+1\right) e^{-\left( j+\frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2}t}

while the finite sum in (?) may be expressed by the series

\sum\limits_{\ell =0}^{+\infty }\sigma _{p}^{(\nu )}\left( \ell \right) \ t^{\ell }

with coefficients

\sigma _{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( \ell \right) =\frac{(-1)\ell }{\ell ! }\sum\limits_{j=0}^{\nu -1}\left( j+\frac{1}{2}\right) ^{2(p+\ell )+1}.

Now, we use the formula [prud1, p.597]:

\sum\limits_{k=0}^{m}(k+a)^q=\frac{1}{q+1}\left[ B_{q+1}(m+1+a)-B_{q+1}(a)\right], \quad q=1,2,\cdots ,

where B_n(z) are the Bernoulli polynomials, for m=\nu-1, q=2(\ell+p)+1, a=\frac{1}{2}, to get

\sigma _{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( \ell \right) =\frac{(-1)^{\ell}}{2(p+\ell +1)\ell !}\left[ B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right)-B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\right].

Summarizing the above calculations, then the sum in (?) also reads

\mathcal{S}=\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[ \left( - \frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{p}\vartheta _{2}(t)+\sum\limits_{\ell =0}^{+\infty}\frac{(-1)^{\ell}}{(p+\ell +1)\ell !}\left[ B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)-B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right)\right] \ t^{\ell }\right]

Applying now the asymptotic of the higher order derivative of \vartheta _{2}(t) as t\searrow 0^{+} ([M_1928, p.281]) :

\left( \frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{p}\vartheta _{2}(t)\simeq \frac{(-1)^{p}p!}{ t^{1+p}}+\sum\limits_{s=0}^{+\infty }\frac{B_{s+p}t^{s}}{s!}

in terms of Bernoulli numbers \left( B_{d\text{\ }}\right) defined by the recursion relation [Aw2019, p.8]:

B_{d}=\frac{\left( -1\right) ^{d}}{d+1}\left( 1-2^{-2d-1}\right)B_{2d+2} , \text{ \ }d=0,1,2,...

By combining (?) and the formula [prud1, p.777]

B_d\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) =-(1-2^{1-d}) B_d,

we deduce that

B_{2(d+1)}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) =(-1)^{d+1}(d+1)B_d.

For d=p+s (?) reads

B_{2(p+s+1)}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) =(-1)^{p+s+1}(p+s+1)B_{p+s}.

Substituting (?) and (?) into (?), we get after simplifications

\mathcal{S} \simeq \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[ p!t^{-1-p}+\sum\limits_{s=0}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^{s+1}B_{2(p+s+1)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right)}{(p+s+1)s!}t^{s}\right] .

Therefore, the heat trace asymptotic formula becomes

\begin{split} Tr\left( e^{\frac{1}{4}t\Delta _{\nu }}\right) &\simeq \frac{e^{\left( \frac{ n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[ \frac{p!}{t^{1+p}}+\sum\limits_{s=0}^{+\infty } \frac{(-1)^{s+1}B_{2(p+s+1)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right)}{(p+s+1)s!} t^{s}\right] \\ &= \frac{e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\left[ \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\frac{p!}{t^{1+p}}+\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\sum\limits_{s=0}^{+\infty } \frac{(-1)^{s+1}B_{2(p+s+1)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right)}{(p+s+1)s!} t^{s}\right] \\ & =\frac{\omega _{n}e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{(4\pi t)^{n}} \left[ 1+\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-2}\frac{\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}p!}{(n-1)!} t^{n-p-1}+\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}}{(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{s=p}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^{s-p+1}B_{2(s+1)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right)}{(s+1)(s-p)!} t^{n+s-p}\right] \end{split}

The first sum in (?) can also be written as

\sum\limits_{d=0}^{n-1}\frac{\gamma _{n-1-d}^{(\nu ,n)}}{(n-1)!}\left( n-1-d\right) !t^{d}

while the second one also reads

\sum\limits_{d=n}^{+\infty }\left( \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{d-n+1}\gamma_{p}^{(\nu ,n)} B_{2(d-n+p+1)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right)}{(n-1)!(d-n+p+1)(d-n)!} \right) t^{d} .

By introducing

\quad \Omega _{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( k\right) :=\frac{(-1)^{k+1} B_{2(k+p+1)}\left(\nu+\frac{1}{2}\right)}{(k+p+1)k!} ,\qquad k=0,1,2,...,

we may rewrite (?) as

Tr\left( e^{\frac{1}{4}t\Delta _{\nu }}\right) \simeq \frac{\omega _{n}e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{(4\pi t)^{n}}\left[ 1+\sum\limits_{d=1}^{n-1}\frac{\gamma _{n-d-1}^{(\nu ,n)}(n-d-1)!}{(n-1)!} t^{d}+\sum\limits_{d=n}^{+\infty }\left( \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}}{(n-1)!}\Omega _{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( d-n\right) \right) t^{d}\right]
=\frac{\omega _{n}}{(4\pi t)^{n}}\left[ \sum\limits_{d=0}^{+\infty }c_{d}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }\ t^{d}\right] \left[ \sum\limits_{i=0}^{+ \infty }\frac{1}{i!}\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) ^{i}\right]

where the coefficients c_{d}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }are given by

c_{d}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }=\left\{ \begin{array}{c} \frac{(n-d-1)!}{(n-1)!}\gamma _{n-d-1}^{(\nu ,n)},\quad 0\leq d\leq n-1 \\ \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{\gamma_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}}{(n-1)!}\Omega _{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( d-n\right),\quad d\geq n \end{array} \right.

Since p\in \{0,\cdots, n-1\} in the second expression of (?), we may Write

\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}=\frac{(n-1)!}{p!}c_{n-p-1}^{\left( \nu ,n\right)}, \qquad 0\leq p \leq n-1

and then, the expression of c_{d}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) } can be simplify as follows

c_{d}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }=\left\{ \begin{array}{c} \frac{(n-d-1)!}{(n-1)!}\gamma _{n-d-1}^{(\nu ,n)},\quad 0\leq d\leq n-1 \\ \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{c_{n-p-1}^{\left( \nu ,n\right)}}{p!}\Omega _{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( d-n\right) ,\quad d\geq n. \end{array} \right.

This means that the coefficients c_{d}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) } satisfy a n-terms recurrence relation when d\geq n.

\left( i\right) Case even n\geq 2. In this case, the product (Proof) can also be presented as

\mathcal{\wp }'=\prod\limits_{l=\nu }^{\frac{n}{2}+\nu -1}\left( r^{2}-l^{2}\right) \prod\limits_{s=1-\nu }^{\frac{n}{2}-\nu -1}\left( r^{2}-s^{2}\right) \qquad \text{(product omitted for $n = 2$)}

and further it can be decomposed as

\mathcal{\wp }'=\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}r^{2p}.

where the numbers \tau _{0}^{(\nu ,n)},...,\tau _{n-1}^{(\nu ,n)} can be computed explicitly (see Sect.?). By using (?), the multiplicity in (Proof) takes the form

\dim _{\mathbb{C}}\mathcal{A}_{m}^{\nu }=\frac{2}{n!(n-1)!} \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left( m+\nu +\frac{n}{2}\right) ^{2p+1}

We now may insert the r.h.s of (?) into the trace formula (?) to get

\begin{split} Tr\left( e^{\frac{1}{4}t\Delta _{\nu }}\right) &= e^{\left( \frac{n^{2} }{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}\sum\limits_{m=0}^{+\infty }\left[ \frac{2}{n!(n-1)!} \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left( m+\nu +\frac{n}{2}\right)^{2p+1}\right] e^{-\left( m+\nu +\frac{n}{2}\right)^{2}t}\\ &=\frac{2 e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{\mu=\nu+\frac{n}{2}}^{+\infty }e^{-\mu^{2}t}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mu^{2p+1} \\ &=\frac{ e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\left[ 2\sum\limits_{\mu=1}^{+\infty }e^{-\mu^{2}t}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mu^{2p+1}-2\sum\limits_{\mu=1}^{\nu+\frac{n}{2}-1}e^{-\mu^{2}t}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mu^{2p+1}\right] \\ &=\frac{ e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\left[S_1-S_2\right]. \end{split}

Now, recall the Jacobi’s theta function \left( \left[ ..\right] \text{, p..} \right) :

\vartheta _{3}\left( t\right) :=2\sum\limits_{l=1}^{+\infty }le^{-l^{2}t}

Then one can see that the p derivative of \vartheta _{3}\left( t\right) satisfies

\left( -1\right) ^{p}\left( \frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{p}\left[ \vartheta _{3}(t)\right] =2\sum\limits_{l=1}^{+\infty }l^{2p+1}e^{-l^{2}t}

Therefore,

S_1=\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left( -1\right) ^{p}\left( \frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{p}\left[ \vartheta _{3}(t)\right].

From (?) and (?) we see that for \mu raning over the set \{\nu ,\nu +1,\cdots ,\nu +\frac{n}{2}-1\} the sum

\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mu ^{2p}=0,

and therefore S_2 reduces to

S_2=2\sum\limits_{\mu=1}^{\nu-1}e^{-\mu^{2}t}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\mu^{2p+1}.

The above sum can be expressed as follows

\begin{split} S_2&=2\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\sum\limits_{\mu=1}^{\nu-1}e^{-\mu^{2}t}\mu^{2p+1}\\ &=2\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\sum\limits_{\ell =0}^{+\infty }\varrho _{p}^{(\nu )}\left( \ell \right) \ t^{\ell } \end{split}

with coefficients

\varrho_{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( \ell \right) =\frac{(-1)\ell }{\ell ! }\sum\limits_{\mu=1}^{\nu -1}\mu ^{2(p+\ell )+1}.

Now, we use the formula [prud1, p.596]:

\sum\limits_{k=1}^{m}k^q=\frac{1}{q+1}\left[ B_{q+1}(m+1)-B_{q+1}\right], \quad q=1,2,\cdots ,

for m=\nu-1, q=2(\ell+p)+1, to get

\varrho_{p}^{\left( \nu \right) }\left( \ell \right) =\frac{(-1)^{\ell}}{2(p+\ell +1)\ell !}\left[ B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\nu\right)-B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\right].

Therefore, the trace formula becomes

\mathcal{T}:=Tr\left( e^{\frac{1}{4}t\Delta _{\nu }}\right) =\frac{e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{ 4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)} \left[ \left( -1\right) ^{p}\left( \frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{p}\left[ \vartheta _{3}(t)\right] -\sum\limits_{\ell =0}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^{\ell}\left[ B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\nu\right)-B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\right]}{(p+\ell +1)\ell !} \ t^{\ell } \right]

Applying now the asymptotic of the higher order derivative of \vartheta _{3}(t) as t\searrow 0^{+} [Awon2019, p.11] :

\left( \frac{d}{dt}\right) ^{\ell }\vartheta _{3}(t)\simeq \frac{(-1)^{\ell }\ell !}{t^{1+\ell }}+\sum\limits_{j=\ell }^{+\infty }\frac{\left( -1\right) ^{j}B_{2j+2}}{(j+1)(j-\ell)!}t^{j-\ell }

where \left( B_{d}\right) are Bernoulli numbers in (?), substituting (?) into (?), we get

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} \mathcal{T} &\simeq \frac{e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[\frac{p !}{t^{1+p}}+\left( -1\right)^{p}\sum\limits_{j=p}^{+\infty }\frac{\left( -1\right) ^{j}B_{2j+2}}{(j+1)(j-p)!}t^{j-p } -\sum\limits_{\ell =0}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^{\ell}\left[ B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\nu\right)-B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\right]}{(p+\ell +1)\ell !} \ t^{\ell } \right]\\ &= \frac{e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[\frac{p !}{t^{1+p}}+\sum\limits_{\ell=0}^{+\infty }\frac{\left( -1\right) ^{\ell}B_{2(\ell +p+1)}}{(\ell+p+1)\ell !}t^{\ell } -\sum\limits_{\ell =0}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^{\ell}\left[ B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\nu\right)-B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\right]}{(p+\ell +1)\ell !} \ t^{\ell } \right] \\ &= \frac{e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{n!(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\tau _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[\frac{p !}{t^{1+p}}+\sum\limits_{\ell =0}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^{\ell}\left[ 2B_{2(p+\ell +1)}-B_{2(p+\ell +1)}\left(\nu\right)\right]}{(p+\ell +1)\ell !} \ t^{\ell } \right] \end{split} \end{aligned}

We denote Vol\left(\textbf{P}^n(\mathbb{C})\right)=\omega_n=(4\pi)^n/n! and we use the fact that \tau_{n-1}^{(\nu ,n)}=1, to write

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} \mathcal{T} &\simeq \frac{\omega_n e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{(4\pi t)^n}\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}}{(n-1)!}\left[p! t^{n-p-1}+\sum\limits_{\ell=0}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^\ell}{(p+\ell+1)\ell !}\left[ 2B_{2(p+\ell+1)}-B_{2(p+\ell+1)}(\nu)\right] \ t^{n+\ell } \right] \\ &= \frac{\omega_n e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{(4\pi t)^n}\left[1+\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-2}\frac{\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}p !}{(n-1)!} t^{n-p-1}+\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}}{(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{\ell=0}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^\ell}{(p+\ell+1)\ell !}\left[ 2B_{2(p+\ell+1)}-B_{2(p+\ell+1)}(\nu)\right] \ t^{n+\ell } \right] \\ &= \frac{\omega_n e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{(4\pi t)^n}\left[1+T_1+T_2 \right] \end{split} \end{aligned}

For T_1, we have

T_1=\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-2}\frac{\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}p !}{(n-1)!} t^{n-p-1}=\sum\limits_{d=1}^{n-1}\frac{\tau_{n-d-1}^{(\nu ,n)}\left(n-d-1\right) !}{(n-1)!} t^{d}.

For T_2, we have

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} S_2 &=\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}}{(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{\ell=0}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^\ell}{(p+\ell+1)\ell !}\left[ 2B_{2(p+\ell+1)}-B_{2(p+\ell+1)}(\nu)\right] \ t^{n+\ell }\\ &=\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}}{(n-1)!}\sum\limits_{d=n}^{+\infty }\frac{(-1)^{d-n}}{(p+d-n+1)(d-n)!}\left[ 2B_{2(p+d-n+1)}-B_{2(p+d-n+1)}(\nu)\right] \ t^{d }\\ &=\sum\limits_{d=n}^{+\infty }\left(\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{d-n}\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[ 2B_{2(p+d-n+1)}-B_{2(p+d-n+1)}(\nu)\right]}{(n-1)!(p+d-n+1)(d-n)!} \right) \ t^{d } \end{split} \end{aligned}

Therefore

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} \mathcal{T} &\simeq \frac{\omega_n e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}}{(4\pi t)^n}\left[1+\sum\limits_{d=1}^{n-1}\frac{\tau_{n-d-1}^{(\nu ,n)}\left(n-d-1\right) !}{(n-1)!} t^{d}+\sum\limits_{d=n}^{+\infty }\left(\sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{d-n}\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[ 2B_{2(p+d-n+1)}-B_{2(p+d-n+1)}(\nu)\right]}{(n-1)!(p+d-n+1)(d-n)!} \right) \ t^{d } \right] \end{split} \end{aligned}

which can also be written as

\frac{\omega _{n}}{(4\pi t)^{n}}e^{\left( \frac{n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) t}\sum\limits_{i=0}^{+\infty }c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }t^{i}

where

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }=\left\{ \begin{array}{c} 1,\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad i=0\\ \tau _{n-1-i}^{(\nu ,n)}\frac{\left(n-i-1\right) !}{\left( n-1\right) !},\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad 1\leq i\leq n-1\\ \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{i-n}\tau_{p}^{(\nu ,n)}\left[ 2B_{2(p+i-n+1)}-B_{2(p+i-n+1)}(\nu)\right]}{(n-1)!(p+i-n+1)(i-n)!} ,\qquad i\geq n \end{array} \right. \end{split} \end{aligned}

Since in the last expression of c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) } where i\geq n, we have p\in \{0,\cdots, n-1\} we may write

\gamma _{p}^{(\nu ,n)}=\frac{(n-1)!}{p!}c_{n-p-1}^{\left( \nu ,n\right)}, \qquad 0\leq p \leq n-1

and then, the expression of c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) } simplifies as follows

\begin{aligned} \begin{split} c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }=\left\{ \begin{array}{c} 1,\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad i=0\\ \tau _{n-1-i}^{(\nu ,n)}\frac{\left(n-i-1\right) !}{\left( n-1\right) !},\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad 1\leq i\leq n-1\\ \sum\limits_{p=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{i-n}c_{n-p-1}^{\left( \nu ,n\right)}\left[ 2B_{2(p+i-n+1)}-B_{2(p+i-n+1)}(\nu)\right]}{p!(p+i-n+1)(i-n)!} ,\qquad i\geq n. \end{array} \right. \end{split} \end{aligned}

Therefore, we may rewrite (?) as

Tr\left( e^{\frac{1}{4}t\Delta _{\nu }}\right) \simeq \frac{\omega _{n}}{ (4\pi t)^{n}}\left[ \sum\limits_{k=0}^{+\infty }c_{k}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }\ t^{k}\right] \left[ \sum\limits_{j=0}^{+\infty }\frac{1}{j!}\left( \frac{ n^{2}}{4}+\nu ^{2}\right) ^{j}\right] .

Finally, in both cases the r.h.s of (?) and (?) may also be seen as a Cauchy product of two power series as

Tr\left( e^{\frac{1}{4}t\Delta _{\nu }}\right) \simeq\frac{1}{(4\pi t)^{n}} \sum\limits_{d=0}^{+\infty }\left[ \omega _{n}\sum\limits_{i=0}^{d}\frac{ \left( n^{2}+4\nu ^{2}\right) ^{d-i}}{4^{d-i}\left( d-i\right) !} c_{i}^{\left( \nu ,n\right) }\right] t^{d}.

This ends the proof of the theorem.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2202.02160v1 by K. Ahbli, A. Hafoud and Z. Mouayn, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2202/2202.02160.jsonl.