arXiv reader

Certain properties of generalized tracially approximated C*-algebras

Qingzhai Fan and Jiahui Wang

arXiv
2309.08900v2 · PDF · 5 April 2024
Categories
math.OA
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

We show that the following properties of unital {\rm C^*}-algebra in a class of \Omega are preserved by unital simple {\rm C^*}-algebra in the class of \rm WTA\Omega: (1) uniform property \Gamma, (2) a certain type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n, (3) weakly (m, n)-divisible.

Items 19

Theorem

Theorem 2.1

1NN0

Let A be a {\rm C^*}-algebra.

(1) Let a, b\in A_+ and any \varepsilon>0 be such that \|a-b\|<\varepsilon. Then (a-\varepsilon)_+\precsim b.

(2) Let a, p be positive elements in A with p a projection. If p\precsim a, and p is not equivalent to a, then there is a nonzero element b in A such that bp=0 and b+p\precsim a.

(3) Let a be a positive element of {\rm C^*}-algebra A and a is not Cuntz equivalent to a projection. Then there exists non-zero positive element d\in A such that (a-\delta)_++d\precsim a.

Used by Proof, Proof
Definition

Definition 2.2

ZYVH

([KM].) Let A be a unital {\rm C^*}-algebra. Let m, n\geq 1 be two integers. A is said to be weakly (m, n)-divisible, if for every a\in {\rm M}_{\infty}(A)_{+} and any \varepsilon>0, there exist elements x_{1}, x_{2}, \cdots, x_{n}\in {\rm M}_{\infty}(A)_{+}, such that m\left\langle x_{j}\right\rangle \leq \left\langle a \right\rangle, for all j=1, 2, \cdots, n and \left\langle (a-\varepsilon)_{+} \right\rangle\leq\left\langle x_{1} \right\rangle+\left\langle x_{2} \right\rangle+\cdots+\left\langle x_{n} \right\rangle.

Definition

Definition 2.3

QAFY

([FFZ].) Let A be a unital {\rm C^*}-algebra. Let m, n\geq 1 be two integers. A is said to be secondly weakly (m, n)-divisible, if for every a\in {\rm M}_{\infty}(A)_{+} and any \varepsilon>0, there exist elements x_{1}, x_{2}, \cdots, x_{n}\in {\rm M}_{\infty}(A)_{+} such that m\left\langle x_{j}\right\rangle \leq \left\langle a \right\rangle +\left\langle a \right\rangle for all j=1, 2, \cdots, n, and \left\langle (a-\varepsilon)_{+} \right\rangle\leq\left\langle x_{1} \right\rangle+\left\langle x_{2} \right\rangle+\cdots+\left\langle x_{n} \right\rangle.

Definition

Definition 2.4

IZ3B

([EFF].) A simple unital {\rm C^*}-algebra A is said to belong to the class {\rm WTA}\Omega if, for any \varepsilon>0, any finite subset F\subseteq A, and any non-zero element a\geq 0, there exist a projection p\in A, an element g\in A with 0\leq g\leq 1, and a unital {\rm C^*}-subalgebra B of A with g\in B, ~1_B=p, and B\in \Omega, such that

(1) (p-g)x\in_{\varepsilon} B, ~ x(p-g)\in_{\varepsilon} B for all x\in F,

(2) \|(p-g)x-x(p-g)\|<\varepsilon for all x\in F,

(3) 1-(p-g)\precsim a, and

(4) \|(p-g)a(p-g)\|\geq \|a\|-\varepsilon.

Definition

Definition 2.5

W4F1

([WW3].) A {\rm C^*}-algebra A has nuclear dimension at most n, and denoted by {\rm dim_{nuc}}\leq n, if there exists a net (F_\lambda,\psi_\lambda, \varphi_\lambda)_{\lambda\in \Lambda} such that the F_\lambda are finite-dimensional {\rm C^*}-algebras, and such that \psi_\lambda:A\to F_\lambda and \varphi_\lambda:F_\lambda\to A are completely positive maps satisfying

(1) \psi_\lambda\varphi_\lambda(a)\to a uniformly on finite subsets of A,

(2) \|\psi_\lambda\|\leq 1,

(3) for each \lambda, F_\lambda decomposes into n+1 ideals F_\lambda={F_\lambda}^0+\cdots+{F_\lambda}^n such that \varphi_\lambda|_{{F_\lambda}^i} is completely positive contractive order zero maps (which means preserves orthogonality, i.e., \varphi_\lambda(e)\varphi_\lambda(f)=0 for all e,~ f\in {{F_\lambda}^i} with ef=0) for i=0,~\cdots,~n.

Definition

Definition 2.6

T6EH

([FU].) Let A be a \rm C^{*}-algebra. Let n\in \mathbb{N} be an integer. A is said to have second type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n, and denoted by {\rm {T^2dim_{nuc}}}(A)\leq n, if for any finite positive subset \mathcal{F}\subseteq A, for any \varepsilon>0 and for any nonzero positive element a\in A, there exist a finite dimensional \rm C^{*}-algebra F=F_{0}\oplus\cdots\oplus F_{n} and completely positive maps \psi:A\rightarrow F, \varphi:F\rightarrow A such that

(1) for any x\in F, there exists x'\in A_{+}, such that x'\precsim a and \|x-x'-\varphi\psi(x)\|<\varepsilon,

(2) \|\psi\|\leq1, and

(3) \varphi|_{F_{i}} is a contractive completely positive order zero map for i=1, \cdots, n.

Definition

Definition 2.7

1ZFS

Let A be a unital \rm C^{*}-algebra. Let n\in \mathbb{N} be an integer. A will said to have a new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n, if for any finite positive subset \mathcal{F}\subseteq A, for any \varepsilon>0 and for any nonzero positive element a\in A_{+}, there exist a finite dimensional \rm C^{*}-algebra F=F_{0}\oplus\cdots\oplus F_{n} and completely positive maps \psi:A\rightarrow F, \varphi:F\rightarrow A such that

(1) for any x\in F, there exists x'\in A_{+}, such that \|x-x'-\varphi\psi(x)\|<\varepsilon,

(2) (1_{A}-\varphi\psi(1_{A})-\varepsilon)_+\precsim a,

(3) \|\psi\|\leq1, and

(4) \varphi|_{F_{i}} is a contractive completely positive order zero map for i=1, \cdots, n.

Theorem

Theorem 2.8

K8ID

([CETWW1].) Let A be a separable {\rm C^*}-algebra with T(A) (the trace state space of A) nonempty and compact. Then the following are equivalent:

(1) A has uniform property \Gamma.

(2) For any finite subset F\subseteq A, any \varepsilon>0, and any integer n\in \mathbb{N}, there exist pairwise orthogonal positive contractions e_1, \cdots, e_n\in A such that for i=1, \cdots, n, and a\in F, we have \|e_ia-ae_i\|<\varepsilon and

\sup_{\tau\in T(A)}\|\tau(ae_i)-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a)\|<\varepsilon.
Used by Proof
Theorem

Theorem 3.1

K20T

Let \Omega be a class of unital separable \rm C^{*}-algebra such that T(B) (the trace state space of B) is nonempty and compact and B has uniform property \Gamma for any B\in \Omega. Then A has uniform property \Gamma for any simple infinite-dimensional separable unital stably finite \rm C^{*}-algebra A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega.

Proof of Theorem 3.1

Since A is a stably finite \rm C^{*}-algebra, then T(A) is nonempty. This together with the unitality of A implies that T(A) is compact. By Theorem 2.8: (2), we need to show that for fixed finite subset F=\{a_1, a_2, \cdots, a_k\} of A (we may assume that \|a_j\|\leq 1 for all j=1, \cdots, k), any \varepsilon>0, and any integer n\in \mathbb{N}, there exist pairwise orthogonal positive contractions e_1, \cdots, e_n\in A such that \|e_ia_j-a_je_i\|<\varepsilon and

\sup_{\tau\in T(A)}\|\tau(a_je_i)-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j)\|<\varepsilon,

for i=1, \cdots, n, and j=1, \cdots, k.

For \varepsilon>0, we choose 0<\delta<\varepsilon with X=[0,1], f(t)=t^{1/2}, g(t)=(1-t)^{1/2} according to Lemma 2.5.11 in [L2].

Since A is an infinite-dimensional unital simple separable {\rm C^*}-algebra, by Corollary 2.5 in [P3], there exists a nonzero positive element a\in A such that \delta>d_\tau(a) =\lim_{n\to\infty}\tau(a^{1/n}) for any \tau\in T(A).

For F=\{a_1, a_2, \cdots, a_k\}, any \delta>0, and nonzero a\in A_+, since A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, there exist a projection p\in A, an element g\in A with \|g\|\leq1 and a unital \rm C^{*}-subalgebra B of A with g\in B, 1_{B}=p and B\in\Omega such that

(1) (p-g)x\in_{\delta}B, ~x(p-g)\in_{\delta}B for any x\in F,

(2) \|(p-g)x-x(p-g)\|<\delta for any x\in F, and

(3) 1_{A}-(p-g)\precsim a.

By (2), we have

(1)' \|(1_{A}-(p-g))a_j-a_j(1_{A}-(p-g))\|<\delta for any j=1, \cdots, k.

By (3) and by Proposition 1.19 of [P3], we have

d_\tau(1_{A}-(p-g))\leq d_\tau(a)

for any \tau\in T(A). Since d_\tau(a)<\delta, and \tau(1_{A}-(p-g))\leq d_\tau(1_{A}-(p-g)), we have

\tau(1_{A}-(p-g))<\delta

for any \tau\in T(A).

By the choice of \delta, by (2), (1)' and by Lemma 2.5.11 in [L2], one has

\|(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}a_j-a_j(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}\|<\varepsilon, and

\|(p-g)^{1/2}a_j-a_j(p-g)^{1/2}\|<\varepsilon.

By (1), there exists a_j'\in B such that

(2)' \|(p-g)a_j-a_j'\|<\delta.

By (1)' and (2)', one has

\|a_j-a_j'-(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}a_j(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}\|

=\|(1_{A}-(p-g))a_j+(p-g)a_j-a_j'- (1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}a_j(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}\|

\leq\|(1_{A}-(p-g))a_j-(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}a_j(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}\|+ \|(p-g)a_j-a_j'\|<\varepsilon+\delta<2\varepsilon, and

\|(p-g)^{1/2}a_j(p-g)^{1/2}-a_j'\|\leq\|(p-g)^{1/2}a_j(p-g)^{1/2}- (p-g)a_j\|+\|(p-g)a_j-a_j'\| <\varepsilon+\delta<2\varepsilon for all 1\leq j\leq k.

For \varepsilon>0, and any integer n\in \mathbb{N}, we choose \delta''=\delta''(\varepsilon,n) (with \delta''<\varepsilon) sufficiently small such that satisfying Lemma 2.5.12 in [L2].

For \delta''/2>0, finite subset \{a_1', a_2', \cdots, a_k', (p-g), (p-g)^{1/2}\} of B and n\in \mathbb{N}, since B has uniform property \Gamma, there exist pairwise orthogonal positive contractions e_1', \cdots, e_n'\in B such that for i=1, \cdots, n, j=1, \cdots, k, one has

\|e_i'a_j'-a_j'e_i'\|<\delta''/2, \|e_i'(p-g)-(p-g)e_i'\|<\delta''/2,
\|e_i'(p-g)^{1/2}-(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'\|<\delta''/2,

and

\sup_{\tau\in T(B)}\|\tau(a_j'e_i')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')\|<\delta''/2.

Since \|(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'-e_i'(p-g)^{1/2}\|<\delta'', and e_i'e_j'=0, i\neq j, so we have

\|(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'(p-g)^{1/2}(p-g)^{1/2}e_j'(p-g)^{1/2}\|

\leq\|(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'(p-g)^{1/2}(p-g)^{1/2}e_j'(p-g)^{1/2}- (p-g)e_i'(p-g)^{1/2}e_j'(p-g)^{1/2}\| +\|(p-g)e_i'(p-g)^{1/2}e_j'(p-g)^{1/2}- (p-g)e_i'e_j'(p-g)\|

<\delta''/2+\delta''/2=\delta''.

By the choice of \delta, since (p-g)^{1/2}e_i'(p-g)^{1/2} is a contraction, by the proof the Lemma 2.5.12 in [L2], one can fine pairwise orthogonal positive contractions e_i (i=1,\cdots, n), such that

\|(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'(p-g)^{1/2}-e_i\|<\varepsilon.

We have

\|a_je_i-a_j'e_i'\|\leq\| a_je_i-a_j(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'(p-g) ^{1/2}\|

+\|a_j(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'(p-g)^{1/2}-a_j(p-g)^{1/2}(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'\|

+\|a_j(p-g)^{1/2}(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'-(p-g)^{1/2}a_j(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'\|

+\|(p-g)^{1/2}a_j(p-g)^{1/2}e_i'-a_j'e_i'\|\leq 4\varepsilon.

With the same argument, one has

\|e_ia_j-e_i'a_j'\|<4\varepsilon

for i=1, \cdots, n, j=1, \cdots, k.

Since \|e_i'a_j'-a_j'e_i'\|<\delta''/2, so one has

\|a_je_i-e_ia_j\|

\leq\|a_je_i-a_j'e_i'\|+\|a_j'e_i'-e_i'a_j'\|+\|e_i'a_j'-e_ia_j\|

<4\varepsilon+4\varepsilon+\delta''/2<9\varepsilon, for i=1,\cdots, n, j=1, \cdots, k.

Since \|a_je_i-a_j'e_i'\|<4\varepsilon for any \tau\in T(A), one has

|\tau(a_je_i)-\tau(a_j'e_i') |<4\varepsilon.

Since \|a_i-a_i'-(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}a_j(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}\|<2\varepsilon, we have

|\tau(a_j)-\tau(a_j')-\tau((1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2}a_j(1_{A}-(p-g))^{1/2})|<2\varepsilon.

Therefore, we have

|\tau(a_je_i)-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j)|

=|\tau(a_je_i)-\tau(a_j'e_i')|+|\tau(a_j'e_i')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')| +|(\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j)|

\leq4\varepsilon+|\tau(a_j'e_i')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')|+\frac{1}{n} (2\varepsilon+\tau((1-(p-g))^{1/2}a_j(1-(p-g))^{1/2}))

\leq4\varepsilon+|\tau(a_j'e_i')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')|+\frac{1}{n} (2\varepsilon+\tau(1-(p-g))

\leq5\varepsilon+|\tau(a_j'e_i')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')|.

Therefore, one has

\sup_{\tau\in T(A)}|\tau(a_je_i)-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j)|

\leq \sup_{\tau\in T(A)}|\tau(a_j'e_i')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')|+5\varepsilon

\leq \frac{1}{\tau(p)}\sup_{\tau\in T(B)}|\tau(a_j'e_i')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')|+5\varepsilon

\leq \frac{1}{1-\delta}\sup_{\tau\in T(B)}|\tau(a_j'e_i')-\frac{1}{n}\tau(a_j')|+5\varepsilon

<5\varepsilon +\frac{\delta''}{1-\delta} <6\varepsilon.

By Theorem 2.11:(2), A has uniform property \Gamma.

Corollary

Corollary 3.2

RQT6

([FZ]) Let A be an infinite-dimensional stably finite unital simple {\rm C^*}-algebra. Let B\subseteq A be a centrally large subalgebra of A such that B has uniform property \Gamma. Then A has uniform property \Gamma.

Corollary

Corollary 3.3

NGFG

([FZ]) Let \Omega be a class of stably finite unital {\rm C^*}-algebras such that for any B\in \Omega, B has uniform property \Gamma. Then A has uniform property \Gamma for any simple unital {\rm C^*}-algebra A\in \rm{TA}\Omega.

Theorem

Theorem 3.4

TGHU

Let \Omega be a class of unital nuclear {\rm C^*}-algebras which have the new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n (in the sense of Definition 2.7). Then A has the new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n for any simple unital {\rm C^*}-algebra A\in{\rm WTA}\Omega.

Proof of Theorem 3.4

We must show that for any finite positive subset \mathcal{F}=\{a_1, a_2, \cdots, a_k\} \subseteq A, for any \varepsilon>0, and for any nonzero positive element b\in A, there exist a finite dimensional \rm C^{*}-algebra F=F_{0}\oplus\cdots\oplus F_{n} and completely positive maps \psi:A\rightarrow F,  \varphi:F\rightarrow A such that

(1) for any x\in F, there exists \overline{x}\in A_+, such that \|x-\overline{x}-\varphi\psi(x)\|<\varepsilon,

(2) (1_{A}-\varphi\psi(1_{A})-\varepsilon)_+\precsim b,

(3) \|\psi\|\leq1, and

(4) \varphi|_{F_{i}} is a completely positive contractive order zero map for i=1, \cdots, n.

By Lemma 2.3 of [L2], there exist positive elements b_{1}, b_{2}\in A of norm one such that b_{1}b_{2}=0, b_{1}\sim b_{2} and b_{1}+b_{2}\precsim b.

Given \varepsilon'>0, for H=\mathcal{F}\cup\{b\}, since A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, there exist a projection p\in A, an element g\in A with \|g\|\leq1 and a unital \rm C^{*}-subalgebra B of A with g\in B, 1_{B}=p and B\in\Omega such that

(1)' (p-g)x\in_{\varepsilon'}B, x(p-g)\in_{\varepsilon'}B for any x\in H,

(2)' \|(p-g)x-x(p-g)\|<\varepsilon' for any x\in H,

(3)' 1_{A}-(p-g)\precsim b_{1}\sim b_{2}, and

(4)' \|(p-g)b(p-g)\|\geq 1-\varepsilon'.

By (2)' and Lemma 2.5.11 of [L2], with sufficiently small \varepsilon', we can get

(5)' \|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}x-x(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon for any x\in H, and

(6)' \|(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}x-x(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon for any x\in H.

By (1)' and (5)', with sufficiently small \varepsilon', there exist positive elements a'_{1}, \cdots, a'_{n}\in B and a positive element b_{2}'\in B such that

\|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}-a'_{i}\|<\varepsilon for 1\leq i\leq k, and \|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}b_{2}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}-b_{2}'\|<\varepsilon.

Therefore, one has

\|a_{i}-a'_{i}-(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|

\leq\|a_{i}-(p-g)a_{i}-(1_{A}-(p-g))a_{i}\|+\|(p-g)a_{i}-a'_{i}\|

+\|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}-(p-g)a_{i}\|

+\|(1_{A}-(p-g))a_{i}-(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|

<\varepsilon+\varepsilon+\varepsilon+\varepsilon=4\varepsilon for 1\leq i\leq k.

Since \|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}b_{2}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}-b_{2}'\|<\varepsilon, by (1) of Theorem 2.1, we have

(b_{2}'-3\varepsilon)_{+}\precsim((p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}b_{2}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}-2\varepsilon)_{+}. ~~~ \hspace{0.4cm}\textbf{(3.4.1)}

By (4)', one has

\|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}b_{2}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\| \geq\|(p-g)b_{2}(p-g)\|\geq1-\varepsilon.

Therefore, we have \|(b_{2}'-3\varepsilon)_{+}\|\geq\|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}b_{2}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\|+4\varepsilon\geq1-5\varepsilon, then, with 0<\varepsilon'<\varepsilon<\frac{1}{5}, (b_{2}'-3\varepsilon)_{+}\neq0.

Define a completely positive contractive map \varphi'':A\rightarrow A by \varphi''(a)=(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}. Since B is a nuclear \rm C^{*}-algebra, by Theorem 2.3.13 of [L2], there exists a contractive completely positive map \psi'':A\rightarrow B such that \|\psi''(p-g)-(p-g)\|<\varepsilon, and \|\psi''(a'_{i})-a'_{i}\|<\varepsilon for all 1\leq i\leq n.

Since B\in\Omega, then B has the new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n, there exist a finite dimension \rm C^{*}-algebra F=F_{0}\oplus\cdots\oplus F_{n} and completely positive maps \psi':B\rightarrow F, \varphi':F\rightarrow B such that

(1)'' for any a_{i}' (1\leq i\leq k), there exists \overline{\overline{a_{i}'}}\in B_+, such that \|a_{i}'-\overline{\overline{a_{i}'}}-\varphi'\psi'(a_{i}')\|<\varepsilon, and for g\in B_+, there exists \overline{\overline{g}}\in B, such that \|g-\overline{\overline{g}}-\varphi'\psi'(g)\|<\varepsilon. ~~~~~~\hspace{0.4cm}\textbf{(3.4.2)}

(2)'' (p-\varphi'\psi'(p)-\varepsilon)_+\precsim (b_{2}'-3\varepsilon)_{+},

(3)'' \|\psi'\|\leq1, and

(4)'' \varphi'|_{F_{i}} is a completely positive contractive order zero map for i=1, \cdots, n.

Define \varphi:F\rightarrow A by \varphi(a)=\varphi'(a) and \psi:A\rightarrow F by \psi(a)=\psi'\psi''((p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}) and \overline{a_{i}}=\varphi''(a_{i})+\overline{\overline{a_{i}'}}\in A_+ for 1\leq i\leq k.

Then, one has

(1_{A}-\varphi\psi(1_{A})-4\varepsilon)_+

= (1_{A}-\varphi'\psi'\psi''(p-g)-4\varepsilon)_+

\precsim 1_{A}-(\varphi'\psi'(p)-2\varepsilon)_++\varphi'\psi'(g)

\precsim (1_{A}-p)+(p-\varphi'\psi'(p)-\varepsilon)_++\varphi'\psi'(g)

\precsim (1_{A}-p)+(p-\varphi'\psi'(p)-\varepsilon)_++\varphi'\psi'(g)+(\overline{\overline{g}}-\varepsilon)_+

\precsim (1_{A}-p)+ g+(p-\varphi'\psi'(p)-\varepsilon)_+   (by (3.4.2))

\precsim b_{1}\oplus(b_{2}'-3\varepsilon)_{+}  (by (1)')

\precsim b_{1}\oplus((p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}b_{2}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}-2\varepsilon)_{+}  (by (3.4.1))

\precsim b_{1}+b_{2}\precsim b.

One also has

\|a_{i}-\overline{a_{i}}-\varphi\psi(a_{i})\|=\|a_{i}-\varphi''(a_{i})- \overline{\overline{a_{i}'}}-\varphi'\psi'\psi''((p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}})\|

\leq\|a_{i}-(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}- \overline{\overline{a_{i}'}}-\varphi'\psi'\psi''((p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}})\|

\leq\|a_{i}-a'_{i}-(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(1_{A}-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|+ \|a'_{i}-\overline{\overline{a_{i}'}}-\varphi'\psi'\psi''((p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}})\| \leq3\varepsilon+ \|a'_{i}-\overline{\overline{a_{i}'}}-\varphi'\psi'(a_{i}')\|

+\|\varphi'\psi'(a_{i}')- \varphi'\psi'\psi''(a_{i}')\|+\| \varphi'\psi'\psi''(a_{i}')-\varphi'\psi'\psi''((p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a_{i}(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}})\| <3\varepsilon+2\varepsilon+2\varepsilon+2\varepsilon=9\varepsilon.

Since \varphi'', \varphi', \psi', \psi'' are completely positive contractive maps, then \varphi and \psi are completely positive maps.

For (3)'', \varphi'|_{F_{i}} is a completely positive contractive order zero map for i=0, 1, \cdots, n and \varphi(a)=\varphi'(a), then \varphi|_{F_{i}} is contractive completely positive order zero map for i=0, 1,\cdots, n.

For any x\in A, \|\psi(x)\|=\|\psi'\psi''((p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}x(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}})\|\leq\|\psi'\|\|\psi''\|\|x\|, then \|\psi\|\leq\|\psi''\|\|\psi'\|\leq1.

Therefore, A has the new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n.

Corollary

Corollary 3.5

4W3V

Let A be a unital simple {\rm C^*}-algebra. Let B\subseteq A be a centrally large nuclear subalgebra of A such that B has the new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n. Then A has the new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n.

Corollary

Corollary 3.6

V7DB

Let \Omega be a class of unital nuclear {\rm C^*}-algebras such that for any B\in \Omega, B has the new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n. Then A has the new type of tracial nuclear dimension at most n for any simple unital {\rm C^*}-algebra A\in \rm{TA}\Omega.

Theorem

Theorem 3.7

0E8S

Let \Omega be a class of unital \rm C^{*}-algebras such that B is weakly (m, n)-divisible (with n\neq m) (see Definition 2.2) for any B\in \Omega. Let A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega be a simple unital stably finite \rm C^{*}-algebra such that for any integer n\in \mathbb{N} the \rm C^{*}-algebra {\rm M}_{n}(A) belongs to the class {\rm WTA}\Omega. Then A is secondly weakly (m, n)-divisible (with n\neq m) (see Definition 2.3).

Proof of Theorem 3.7

For given a\in {\rm M}_{\infty}(A)_{+},~\varepsilon>0, we may assume that a\in A_+, and \|a\|=1, (we have replaced {\rm M}_{n}(A) containing a given initially by A), we must show that there are x_{1}, x_{2}, \cdots, x_{n}\in {\rm M}_{\infty}(A)_{+} such that m\langle x_{j}\rangle \leq \langle a \rangle +\langle a \rangle, and \langle (a-\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\langle x_{1} \rangle+\langle x_{2} \rangle+\cdots+\langle x_{n} \rangle for all j=1, 2, \cdots, n.

For any \delta_{1}>0, since A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, there exist a projection p\in A, an element g\in A with 0\leq g \leq1, and a \rm C^{*}-subalgebra B of A with g\in B, 1_{B}=p, and B\in \Omega such that

(1) (p-g)a\in_{\delta_{1}}B, and

(2) \|(p-g)a-a(p-g)\|<\delta_{1}.

By (2), with sufficiently small \delta_{1}, by Lemma 2.5.11 (1) of [L2], we have

(3) \|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a-a(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon/3, and

(4) \|(1-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a-a(1-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon/3.

By (1) and (2), with sufficiently small \delta_{1}, there exists a positive element a^{'}\in B such that

(5) \|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}-a^{'}\|<\varepsilon/3.

By (3), (4) and (5),

\|a-a^{'}-(1-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a(1-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|

\leq\|a-(p-g)a-(1-(p-g))a\|+\|(p-g)a-(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}\|

+\|(1-(p-g))a-(1-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a(1-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|

+\|(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}a(p-g)^{\frac{1}{2}}-a^{'}\|

<\varepsilon/3+\varepsilon/3+\varepsilon/3=\varepsilon.

Since B is weakly (m, n)-divisible, and (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\in B_+, there exist x_{1}^{'}, x_{2}^{'}, \cdots, x_{n}^{'}\in B, such that \langle x_{j}^{'}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{'}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{'}\rangle \leq\langle(a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle, and \langle(a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{'}\rangle repeats m times.

Since B is weakly (m, n)-divisible, and (a^{'}-\varepsilon)_{+}\in B, there exist y_{1}^{'}, y_{2}^{'}, \cdots, y_{n}^{'}\in B, such that \langle y_{j}^{'}\rangle +\langle y_{j}^{'}\rangle +\cdots+\langle y_{j}^{'}\rangle \leq\langle(a^{'}-\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle, and \langle(a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle y_{i}^{'}\rangle, where \langle y_{j}^{'}\rangle repeats m times.

Write a^{''}=(1-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}a(1-(p-g))^{\frac{1}{2}}.

We divide the proof into two cases.

Case (1) We assume that (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+} is Cuntz equivalent to a projection.

(1.1) We assume that (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+} is Cuntz equivalent to a projection.

(1.1.1) We assume that (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+} is Cuntz equivalent to (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}.

(1.1.1.1) If x_{1}^{'}, x_{2}^{'}, \cdots, x_{n}^{'}\in B are all Cuntz equivalent to projections, and \langle(a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\rangle, then, by Theorem 2.1 (2), there exist some integer j and a nonzero projection d such that \langle x_{j}^{'}+d\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{'}+d\rangle+\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{'}+d\rangle \leq\langle(a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{'}+d\rangle repeats m times, otherwise, this contradicts the stably finiteness of A (since m\neq n and \rm C^{*}-algebra A is stably finite).

For any \delta_{2}>0, since A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, there exist a projection p_1\in A, an element g_{1}\in A with 0\leq g_{1} \leq1, and a \rm C^{*}-subalgebra D_1 of A with g_{1}\in D_1, 1_{D{_1}}=p_1, and D_1\in \Omega such that

(1^{'}) (p_1-g_{1})a^{''}\in_{\delta_{2}}D_1,

(2^{'}) \|(p_1-g_{1})a^{''}-a^{''}(p_1-g_{1})\|<\delta_{2}, and

(3^{'}) 1-(p_1-g_{1})\preceq d.

By (1^{'}) and (2^{'}), with sufficiently small \delta_{2}, as above, via the analogues for (4), (5) and (6) for a^{''},~ p_1, and g_{1}, there exist a positive element a^{'''}\in D_1, such that

\|(p_1-g_{1})^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(p_1-g_{1})^{\frac{1}{2}}-a^{'''}\|<\varepsilon/3, and \|a^{''}-a^{'''}-(1-(p_1-g_{1}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_1-g_{1}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon.

Since D_1 is weakly (m, n)-divisible, and (a^{'''}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\in D_1, there exist positive elements x_{1}^{''}, x_{2}^{''}, \cdots, x_{n}^{''}\in D_1, such that

\langle x_{j}^{''}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{''}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{''}\rangle \leq\langle(a^{'''}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle, and \langle(a^{'''}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{''}\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{''}\rangle repeats m times.

Since a^{'}\leq a^{'}+a^{''}, then \langle (a^{'}-\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle (a^{'}+a^{''}-\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle, and \|a-a^{'}-a^{''}\|<\varepsilon, so one has \langle (a^{'}+a^{''}-\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq\langle a\rangle.

Therefore, one has

\langle (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq\langle (a^{'}-\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq\langle a\rangle.

Write x=(1-(p_1-g_{1}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_1-g_{1}))^{\frac{1}{2}}.

Since a^{'''}\leq a^{'''}+x, then \langle (a^{'''}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq\langle (a^{'''}+x-\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle, and \|a^{''}-a^{'''}-x\|<\varepsilon, which implies that

\langle (a^{'''}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq\langle a^{''}\rangle \leq\langle a\rangle.

Therefore, we have

\langle (x_{j}^{'}\oplus d)\oplus x_{j}^{''}\rangle +\langle (x_{j}^{'}\oplus d)\oplus x_{j}^{''}\rangle +\cdots+\langle (x_{j}^{'}\oplus d)+ x_{j}^{''}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{'''}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle+\langle a\rangle, where \langle (x_{j}^{'}\oplus d)\oplus x_{j}^{''}\rangle repeats m times, and

\langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{''}\rangle +\langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{''}\rangle +\cdots\langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{''}\rangle,

\leq\langle (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{'''}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle+\langle a\rangle, where \langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{''}\rangle repeats m times for 1\leq i\leq n and i\neq j.

We also have

\langle (a-10\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{'''}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_1-g_{1}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_1-g_{1}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{'''}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_1-g_{1}))\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{'''}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle d\rangle

\leq\sum_{i=1, i\neq j} ^n\langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{''}\rangle+\langle (x_{j}^{'}\oplus d)\oplus x_{j}^{''}\rangle.

There are the desired inequalities, with\langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{''}\rangle+\langle (x_{j}^{'}\oplus d)\oplus x_{j}^{''}\rangle in place of \langle x_{i}\rangle, and 10\varepsilon in place of \varepsilon.

(1.1.1.2) If x_{1}^{'}, x_{2}^{'}, \cdots, x_{k}^{'}\in B are projections, and \langle(a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle <\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\rangle, then, by Theorem 2.1 (2), there exists a nonzero projection e, such that \langle(a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle+\langle e\rangle \leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\rangle.

As in the part (1.1.1.1), since A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, there exist a projection p_2\in A, an element g_{2}\in A with 0\leq g_{2} \leq1, and a \rm C^{*}-subalgebra D_2 of A with g_{2}\in D_2, 1_{D_{2}}=p_2, and D_2\in \Omega, by (1)', there exists a positive element a^{4}\in D_2, such that

1-(p_2-g_{2})\preceq e, \|(p_2-g_{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(p_2-g_{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}-a^{4}\|<\varepsilon/3, and

\|a^{''}-a^{4}-(1-(p_2-g_{2}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_2-g_{2}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon.

Also as in the part (1.1.1.1), we have \langle (a^{4}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle.

Since D_2 is weakly (m, n)-divisible, (a^{4}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\in D_2, there exist x_{1}^{4}, x_{2}^{4}, \cdots, x_{n}^{4}\in D_2, such that

\langle x_{j}^{4}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{4}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{4}\rangle \leq\langle(a^{4}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle, and

\langle(a^{4}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{4}\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{4}\rangle repeats m times.

Therefore, we have

\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{4}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{4}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{4}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{4}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle+\langle a\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{4}\rangle repeats m time for 1\leq i\leq n.

We also have

\langle (a-10\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{4}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_{2}-g_{2}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_{2}-g_{2}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{4}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_{2}-g_{2}))\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{4}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle e\rangle

\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{4}\rangle.

There are the desired inequalities, with \langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{4}\rangle in place of \langle x_{i}\rangle, and 10\varepsilon in place of \varepsilon.

(1.1.1.3) we assume that there is a purely positive element, and we assume x_{1}^{'} is a purely positive element. As \langle(a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle \leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\rangle, for any \varepsilon>0, there exists \delta>0 such that \langle(a^{'}-4\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq \langle (x_{1}^{'}-\delta)_{+}\rangle \oplus\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\rangle. Since x_{1}^{'} is a purely positive element, by Theorem 2.1 (3), there exists a nonzero positive element s such that \langle(x_{1}^{'}-\delta)_{+} \rangle +\langle s\rangle\leq\langle x_{1}^{'}\rangle.

As in the part (1.1.1.1), since A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, by (1)', there exists a projection p_3\in A, an element g_{3}\in A with 0\leq g_{3} \leq1, and a \rm C^{*}-subalgebra D_3 of A with g_{3}\in D_3, 1_{D_{3}}=p_3, and D_3\in \Omega there exist a positive element a^{5}\in D_3, such that

1-(p_3-g_{3})\preceq s, \|(p_3-g_{3})^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(p_3-g_{3})^{\frac{1}{2}}-a^{5}\|<\varepsilon/3, and

\|a^{''}-a^{5}-(1-(p_3-g_{3}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_3-g_{3}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon.

Also as in the part (1.1.1.1), we have \langle (a^{5}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle.

Since D_3 is weakly (m, n)-divisible, (a^{5}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\in D_3, there exist x_{1}^{5}, x_{2}^{5}, \cdots, x_{n}^{5}\in D_3, such that

\langle x_{j}^{5}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{5}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{5}\rangle \leq\langle(a^{5}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle, and

\langle(a^{5}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{5}\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{5}\rangle repeats m times.

Therefore, we have

\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{5}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{5}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{5}\rangle,

\leq\langle (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{5}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle+\langle a\rangle, where \langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{5}\rangle repeats m times for 1\leq i\leq n.

We also have

\langle (a-10\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{5}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_3-g_{3}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_3-g_{3}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{5}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_3-g_{3}))\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{5}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle s\rangle \leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{5}\rangle.

There are the desired inequalities, with \langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{5}\rangle in place of \langle x_{i}\rangle, and 10\varepsilon in place of \varepsilon.

(1.1.2) we assume that exists nonzero projection r such that \langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle +\langle r\rangle \leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle.

As in the part (1.1.1.1), as A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, there exist a projection p_4\in A, an element g_{4}\in A with 0\leq g_{4} \leq1, and a \rm C^{*}-subalgebra D_4 of A with g_{4}\in D_4, 1_{D_{4}}=p_4, and D_4\in \Omega, by (1)', there exists a positive element a^{6}\in D_4, such that

1-(p_4-g_{4})\preceq r, \|(p_4-g_{4})^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(p_4-g_{4})^{\frac{1}{2}}-a^{6}\|<\varepsilon/3, and

\|a^{''}-a^{6}-(1-(p_4-g_{4}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_4-g_{4}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon.

Also as in the part (1.1.1.1), we have \langle (a^{6}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle.

Since D_4 is weakly (m, n)-divisible, (a^{6}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\in D_4, there exist x_{1}^{6}, x_{2}^{6}, \cdots, x_{n}^{6}\in D_4, such that

\langle x_{j}^{6}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{6}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{6}\rangle \leq\langle(a^{6}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle, and

\langle(a^{6}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{6}\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{6}\rangle repeats m times.

Therefore, we have

\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{6}\rangle +\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{6}\rangle +\cdots+\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{6}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{6}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle+\langle a\rangle, where \langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{6}\rangle repeats m times for 1\leq i\leq n.

We also have

\langle (a-10\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{6}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_4-g_{4}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_4-g_{4}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{6}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_4-g_{4}))\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{6}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle r\rangle \leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{6}\rangle.

There are the desired inequalities, with\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{6}\rangle in place of \langle x_{i}\rangle, and 10\varepsilon in place of \varepsilon.

(1.2) If (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+} is not Cuntz equivalent to a projection, by Theorem 2.1 (3), then there is a nonzero positive element d such that \langle (a^{'}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle d\rangle \leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle.

As in the part (1.1.1.1), since A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, there exist a projection p_5\in A, an element g_{5}\in A with 0\leq g_{5} \leq1, and a \rm C^{*}-subalgebra D_5 of A with g_{5}\in D_5, 1_{D_{5}}=p_5, and D_5\in \Omega, by (1)', there exists a positive element a^{7}\in D_5, such that

1-(p_5-g_{5})\preceq d, \|(p_5-g_{5})^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(p_5-g_{5})^{\frac{1}{2}}-a^{7}\|<\varepsilon/3, and

\|a^{''}-a^{7}-(1-(p_5-g_{5}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_5-g_{5}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon.

Also as in the part (1.1.1.1), we have \langle (a^{7}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle.

Since D_5 is weakly (m, n)-divisible, (a^{7}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\in D_5, there exist x_{1}^{7}, x_{2}^{7}, \cdots, x_{n}^{7}\in D_5, such that

\langle x_{j}^{7}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{7}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{7}\rangle \leq\langle(a^{7}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle, and \langle(a^{7}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{7}\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{7}\rangle repeats m times.

Therefore, we have

\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{7}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{7}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{7}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{7}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle+\langle a\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{'}\oplus x_{j}^{7}\rangle repeats m times for 1\leq i\leq n.

We also have

\langle (a-10\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{7}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_5-g_{5}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_5-g_{5}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{7}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_5-g_{5}))\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{7}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle d\rangle

\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{7}\rangle.

There are the desired inequalities, with \langle x_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{7}\rangle in place of \langle x_{i}\rangle, and 10\varepsilon in place of \varepsilon.

Case(2) If (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+} is not Cuntz equivalent to a projection, by Theorem 2.1 (3), there is a nonzero positive element d such that \langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle d\rangle \leq\langle (a^{'}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle.

As in the part (1.1.1.1), since A\in {\rm WTA}\Omega, there exist a projection p_6\in A, an element g_{6}\in A with 0\leq g_{6} \leq1, and a \rm C^{*}-subalgebra D_6 of A with g_{6}\in D_6, 1_{D_{6}}=p_6, and D_6\in \Omega, by (1)', there exists a positive element a^{8}\in D_6, such that

1-(p_6-g_{6})\preceq d, \|(p_6-g_{6})^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(p_6-g_{6})^{\frac{1}{2}}-a^{8}\|<\varepsilon/3, and

\|a^{''}-a^{8}-(1-(p_6-g_{6}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_6-g_{6}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\|<\varepsilon.

Also as in the part (1.1.1.1), we have \langle (a^{8}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle.

Since D_6 is weakly (m, n)-divisible, (a^{8}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\in D_6, there exist x_{1}^{8}, x_{2}^{8}, \cdots, x_{n}^{8}\in D_6, such that

\langle x_{j}^{8}\rangle +\langle x_{j}^{8}\rangle +\cdots+\langle x_{j}^{8}\rangle \leq\langle(a^{8}-2\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle, and \langle(a^{8}-3\varepsilon)_{+} \rangle\leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle x_{i}^{8}\rangle, where \langle x_{j}^{8}\rangle repeats m times.

Therefore, we have

\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{8}\rangle +\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{8}\rangle +\cdots+\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{8}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{8}-2\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle\leq \langle a\rangle+\langle a\rangle, where \langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{8}\rangle repeats m times for 1\leq i\leq n.

We also have

\langle (a-10\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{8}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_6-g_{6}))^{\frac{1}{2}}a^{''}(1-(p_6-g_{6}))^{\frac{1}{2}}\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{8}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (1-(p_6-g_{6}))\rangle

\leq\langle (a^{'}-3\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle (a^{8}-4\varepsilon)_{+}\rangle+\langle d\rangle \leq\sum_{i=1}^{n}\langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{8}\rangle.

There are the desired inequalities, with \langle y_{i}^{'}\oplus x_{i}^{8}\rangle in place of \langle x_{i}\rangle, and 10\varepsilon in place of \varepsilon.

Corollary

Corollary 3.8

KQEZ

Let A be a unital simple stably finite separable {\rm C^*}-algebra. Let B\subseteq A be a centrally large subalgebra of A such that B is weakly (m, n)-divisible. Then A is secondly weakly (m, n)-divisible.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2309.08900v2 by Qingzhai Fan and Jiahui Wang, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2309/2309.08900.jsonl.