arXiv reader

Upper semicontinuity of algebraic dimension

Sheng Rao

arXiv
2407.02022v3 · PDF · 13 September 2026
Categories
math.CV, math.AG, math.DG
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

We prove the conjecture that the deformation limit of Moishezon manifolds under a smooth deformation over the unit disc in \mathbb{C} is Moishezon. More generally, for a proper holomorphic submersion over the unit disc with connected compact fibers satisfying the \partial\bar\partial-lemma except possibly at one parameter, we show that the very general algebraic dimension is the minimum on the entire disc. The proof builds on Barlet’s theory of cycle spaces and Rao–Tsai’s torsion-freeness method for extending integral Chern classes. Taking this approach as a starting point, we handle the remaining finite-order torsion obstruction by a scalar phase estimate for divisor masses. This gives uniform Gauduchon mass bounds on each component over compact subsets of the base without assuming torsion-freeness. Bishop compactness then establishes properness of every irreducible component of the relative divisor space, and Barlet’s algebraic-dimension theorem yields the conclusion directly. Combined with Rao–Tsai’s theorem,the deformation-limit result also shows that every fiber is Moishezon whenever uncountably many fibers are Moishezon. The Fujiki–Pontecorvo families and Huybrechts’ twistor and Brauer families clarify the scope and necessity of the hypotheses.

Items 64

Theorem

Theorem 1.1

T93J

Let \pi:\mathcal X\to\Delta be the family in (?).

  1. If X_{t_0} admits a smooth strongly Gauduchon form, there are an open neighbourhood U\subset\Delta of t_0, an integer a\ge0, and a countable union \Sigma of irreducible proper analytic subsets of U such that

    a(X_t)\ge a\quad(t\in U), \qquad a(X_t)=a\quad(t\in U\setminus\Sigma).
  2. Suppose that \Delta^\circ\subset\Delta is a dense analytic Zariski open subset and that every X_t with t\in\Delta^\circ satisfies the \partial\bar\partial-lemma. If h^{0,1}(X_t) is constant on \Delta, then

    a(X_t)\ge\inf_{u\in\Delta^\circ}a(X_u)\qquad(t\in\Delta).
Theorem

Theorem 1.2

XIGE

Let \pi:\mathcal X\to\Delta be the family in (?), and assume that uncountably many fibers are Moishezon. For any t_0\in\Delta, the fiber X_{t_0} is Moishezon if either

  1. R^2\pi_*\mathcal O_{\mathcal X} is torsion-free in a neighbourhood of t_0 (equivalently, h^{0,1}(X_t) is constant in a neighbourhood of t_0, by [RT21, Proposition 4.12]); or

  2. X_{t_0} admits a strongly Gauduchon metric.

Theorem

Theorem 1.3 (Upper semicontinuity of algebraic dimension)

7N6S

Assume that there is a point t_0\in\Delta such that X_t satisfies the \partial\bar\partial-lemma for every t\ne t_0. Then there are an integer a_{\mathrm{gen}}\in\{0,\ldots,n\} and a countable union \Sigma of proper closed analytic subsets of \Delta such that

a(X_t)=a_{\mathrm{gen}}\quad(t\in\Delta\setminus\Sigma), \qquad a(X_t)\ge a_{\mathrm{gen}}\quad(t\in\Delta).

Thus the very general algebraic dimension is the minimum on the entire disc. In particular, for every s\in\Delta and every sufficiently small \varepsilon>0 with \{t:|t-s|<\varepsilon\}\Subset\Delta,

a(X_s)\geq \inf_{0<|t-s|<\varepsilon}a(X_t)=a_{\mathrm{gen}}.
Proof of Theorem 1.3

The proper holomorphic submersion \pi:\mathcal X\to\Delta is surjective and n-equidimensional, with irreducible total space and base. Proposition 3.5 verifies properness of every irreducible component of its relative divisor space. Theorem 2.7, namely [Ba15, Proposition 4.0.8], now gives an integer a_{\mathrm{gen}}\in\{0,\ldots,n\} and a countable union \Sigma of proper closed analytic subsets of \Delta such that

a(X_t)=a_{\mathrm{gen}}\quad(t\in\Delta\setminus\Sigma), \qquad a(X_t)\ge a_{\mathrm{gen}}\quad(t\in\Delta).

As \Sigma is countable, every nonempty punctured neighbourhood of every s\in\Delta meets \Delta\setminus\Sigma. Consequently

\inf_{0<|t-s|<\varepsilon}a(X_t)=a_{\mathrm{gen}}\le a(X_s)

whenever the indicated disc is contained in \Delta. This also proves (1.3). No separate argument is needed when a_{\mathrm{gen}}=0.

Corollary

Corollary 1.4 (Moishezon deformation limit)

V91X

If X_t is Moishezon for every t\in\Delta^*, then X_0 is Moishezon.

Used by Proof
Theorem

Theorem 1.5 (Uncountably many Moishezon fibers)

DSZF

If uncountably many fibers of (?) are Moishezon, then every fiber is Moishezon.

Used by Proof, Proof, Proof, Proof
Proof of Theorem 1.5

Let h:=\min_{t\in\Delta}h^1(X_t,\mathcal O_{X_t}). By Grauert’s semicontinuity Theorem 2.13, the set

E:=\{t\in\Delta:h^1(X_t,\mathcal O_{X_t})\ge h+1\}

is a proper closed analytic subset of \Delta, hence discrete. At every s\in\Delta\setminus E, the Hodge number h^{0,1}(X_t) is locally constant. Apply [RT21, Theorem 1.4] after an automorphism of the unit disc sending s to 0. The theorem requires uncountably many Moishezon parameters in the whole disc, not necessarily accumulating at the reference point, so it gives that X_s is Moishezon.

For each p\in E, choose a disc D\Subset\Delta with D\cap E=\{p\}. Every fiber over D\setminus\{p\} is Moishezon. Applying Corollary 1.4 to this restricted family, after rescaling and recentering the base, shows that X_p is Moishezon as well.

Notation

Notation 1.6

3JLY

Complex spaces are reduced unless otherwise specified; Douady spaces and the subspaces they classify may be nonreduced. Cycles retain their positive integral multiplicities. The base disc may be shrunk without further mention. After choosing an Ehresmann trivialization, all fiber cohomology groups are identified with those of a fixed differentiable manifold M. A subscript t denotes restriction to X_t. Integration currents are normalized so that the current [D] of an effective Cartier divisor represents the real image of c_1(\mathcal O(D)). For a coherent analytic sheaf \mathcal F on a compact complex space Y, we write

h^q(Y,\mathcal F):=\dim_{\mathbb C}H^q(Y,\mathcal F).

In particular, h^q(Y_b,\mathcal F|_{Y_b}) denotes the complex dimension of the cohomology of the restricted sheaf on the fiber Y_b.

Theorem

Theorem 2.1 (Compactness of divisor components)

OX6C

Every irreducible component of \mathcal C_{n-1}(X) is compact.

Used by Proof
Theorem

Theorem 2.2 (Barlet classification and fundamental cycles)

91P7

Let M be a complex space.

  1. The reduced Barlet space \mathcal C_k(M) has a universal proper analytic family of compact effective k-cycles. A proper analytic family over a reduced space S determines a holomorphic map S\to\mathcal C_k(M) sending s to its cycle; conversely, pulling back the universal family recovers that family, with multiplicities.

  2. For a flat proper family of pure k-dimensional subspaces, the fundamental cycles form an analytic family over the reduced base.

Lemma

Lemma 2.3 (Constancy of the cycle class)

O8JX

Under an Ehresmann trivialization, the integral homology class of an analytic family of relative cycles is locally constant. Hence every connected analytic family of divisors has one Poincaré-dual class in H^2(M,\mathbb Z).

Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 2.3

For the definition and existence of analytic relative fundamental classes, see [Ba80, § 2 B, Definition 1, and § 2 D, Theorem 2]. The integral homology statement is obtained by the following topological argument. Along a path in the parameter space, adapted scales sweep an integral bordism between the endpoint cycles; the constant local degrees retain the multiplicities. The endpoint cycles are therefore homologous in the fixed differentiable fiber determined by the trivialization.

Lemma

Lemma 2.4 (Cycle compactness from a mass bound)

ZI6M

Let K\Subset\Delta be compact and let H be a fixed Hermitian metric on \mathcal X. A closed subset A\subset\mathcal C_{n-1}(\mathcal X/\Delta) whose cycles are supported in \pi^{-1}(K) and have uniformly bounded H-volume is compact.

Used by Proof, Proof
Proof of Lemma 2.4

This lemma is well known to experts; we include the proof for the reader’s convenience. Properness of \pi makes \pi^{-1}(K) compact. The compactness criterion for Barlet spaces states that a family of compact k-cycles is relatively compact when all supports lie in one compact subset and their volumes for one Hermitian metric are uniformly bounded, by [BM19, Theorem 4.2.72].

That theorem is the cycle-theoretic form of Bishop compactness. Its adapted-scale formulation retains the positive integral multiplicities, so its conclusion is convergence in the Barlet space rather than only Hausdorff convergence of supports.

The assumptions of the criterion hold for A. Thus A is relatively compact in \mathcal C_{n-1}(\mathcal X/\Delta). Since A is closed and the Barlet space is Hausdorff, A is compact.

Theorem

Theorem 2.5 (Proper mapping theorem)

7ZN4

Let f:Y\to B be a proper holomorphic map of complex spaces. For every closed analytic subset Z\subset Y, its image f(Z) is a closed analytic subset of B.

Lemma

Lemma 2.6

EJXJ

Let Y be an irreducible reduced complex space and let h:Y\to B be a nonconstant holomorphic map to a Riemann surface. Then h is open. If V_B\subset B is dense and open, then h^{-1}(V_B) is dense in Y.

Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 2.6

This follows directly from [Dem, Chapter II, Theorem (5.7)]. For completeness, we give a proof. Fix y\in Y. No neighbourhood of y can be mapped to a point: otherwise h would be constant on a nonempty open subset and hence, by the identity principle on the irreducible reduced space, constant on Y. Consequently h cannot be constant on every local irreducible branch through y, for then it would be constant on a neighbourhood of y. Choose a branch on which its germ is nonconstant. A generic linear section through y gives a complex curve germ C\subset Y through y on which h is nonconstant. After normalization, the ordinary open mapping theorem for one complex variable shows that h(C\cap W) contains a neighbourhood of h(y) for every sufficiently small neighbourhood W of y. Hence h is open. If h^{-1}(V_B) were not dense, some nonempty open W\subset Y would map into B\setminus V_B. Openness of h would give a nonempty open subset of B contained in the nowhere-dense complement, a contradiction.

Theorem

Theorem 2.7 (Local algebraic-dimension theorem)

LR8O

Let f:Y\to B be a proper surjective n-equidimensional holomorphic map between irreducible complex spaces. Assume that every irreducible component of \mathcal C_{n-1}(f) is proper over B. Then there are a nonnegative integer a and a countable union \Sigma of closed irreducible analytic subsets of B, each with empty interior, such that

a(Y_b)=a\quad(b\in B\setminus\Sigma), \qquad a(Y_b)\ge a\quad(b\in B).
Used by Proof, Proof
Definition

Definition 2.8

MQYG

A compact complex manifold X satisfies the \partial\bar\partial-lemma if every d-closed pure-type smooth form which is d-exact is \partial\bar\partial-exact. Equivalently, for every bidegree,

\ker d\cap\operatorname{im}d =\operatorname{im}\partial\bar\partial

inside the space of pure-type forms. The equivalent current formulation will also be used.

Lemma

Lemma 2.9

M8CT

Let X be a compact connected complex manifold satisfying the \partial\bar\partial-lemma. If T is a real, d-exact current of type (1,1) on X, then there is a real 0-current \Phi such that

T=i\partial\bar\partial\Phi.
Used by Proof, Proof
Proof of Lemma 2.9

Barlet proves that any d-exact (1,1)-current can be written T=\partial\bar\partial\Theta for a complex 0-current \Theta. When T is real, conjugation gives -\partial\bar\partial\overline\Theta=T. Hence \Phi=(\Theta-\overline\Theta)/(2i) is real and satisfies (2.9).

Definition

Definition 2.10

4AZV

Let X be a compact complex n-fold. A Hermitian form \gamma is Gauduchon if

\partial\bar\partial\gamma^{n-1}=0.

It is strongly Gauduchon if \partial\gamma^{n-1} is \bar\partial-exact. Equivalently, there is a real d-closed (2n-2)-form \Omega such that \Omega^{n-1,n-1}=\gamma^{n-1}, by [Po13, Definition 4.1 and Proposition 4.2].

Lemma

Lemma 2.11

OG60

There is a smooth family of positive (n-1,n-1)-forms

G_t=\gamma_t^{n-1},\qquad \partial_t\bar\partial_tG_t=0, \qquad t\in\Delta.
Lemma

Lemma 2.12

GKCH

After choosing a smooth horizontal splitting of T\mathcal X\to\pi^*T\Delta, the relative form G=(G_t) of Lemma 2.11 extends to a smooth absolute real (2n-2)-form \widetilde G on \mathcal X satisfying \widetilde G|_{X_t}=G_t. In particular,

\mathcal C_{n-1}(\mathcal X/\Delta)\longrightarrow\mathbb R, \qquad Z\longmapsto\int_Z\widetilde G=\int_ZG_{\pi(Z)}

is continuous.

Uses Definition 2.10 · Used by Proof
Theorem

Theorem 2.13 (Coherence, semicontinuity, and base change)

23WK

Let f:Y\to B be a proper holomorphic map and let \mathcal F be a coherent analytic sheaf on Y.

  1. (Coherence) Every R^qf_*\mathcal F is coherent.

  2. (Semicontinuity) If B is a complex manifold and \mathcal F is flat over B, the function b\mapsto h^q(Y_b,\mathcal F|_{Y_b}) is upper semicontinuous in the analytic Zariski topology: for every integer d\ge0, the locus where h^q(Y_b,\mathcal F|_{Y_b})\ge d is a closed analytic subset of B.

  3. (Base change) Under the hypotheses of (ii), where the function b\mapsto h^q(Y_b,\mathcal F|_{Y_b}) is locally constant, R^qf_*\mathcal F is locally free and the natural base-change map is an isomorphism:

    (R^qf_*\mathcal F)_b/\mathfrak m_b(R^qf_*\mathcal F)_b \longrightarrow H^q(Y_b,\mathcal F|_{Y_b}).

    Here \mathfrak m_b is the maximal ideal of \mathcal O_{B,b}.

Lemma

Lemma 2.14 (Base change over a disc of \partial\bar\partial-fibers)

57VF

Let U\subset\Delta be a complex disc such that every X_t, t\in U, satisfies the \partial\bar\partial-lemma. Then, for all integers 0\le p,q\le n, the sheaves R^q\pi_*\Omega^p_{\mathcal X/\Delta}|_U are locally free and satisfy base change.

Used by Proof, Proof
Proof of Lemma 2.14

For every integer 0\le k\le 2n, the \partial\bar\partial-lemma gives

b_k(M)=\sum_{\substack{p+q=k\\0\le p,q\le n}} h^q(X_t,\Omega^p_{X_t})\qquad(t\in U).

Each summand is upper semicontinuous, while the sum is constant. Shrinking about any point of U shows that every summand is locally constant. Theorem 2.13 then makes R^q\pi_*\Omega^p_{\mathcal X/\Delta}|_U locally free and gives base change, as in [Gr60, Satz 5].

Theorem

Theorem 2.15 (Cartan’s theorem B)

ORMP

Let W be a Stein manifold and let \mathcal F be a coherent analytic sheaf on W. Then H^q(W,\mathcal F)=0 for every q\ge1.

Used by Proof, Proof, Proof
Definition

Definition 2.16 (Torsion and torsion-freeness)

USXA

Let \mathcal F be a coherent sheaf on a disc D. Its torsion subsheaf T(\mathcal F) has stalks

T(\mathcal F)_p:=\{s\in\mathcal F_p:\text{there is }0\ne g\in\mathcal O_{D,p} \text{ with }gs=0\}.

The sheaf \mathcal F is torsion-free at p if T(\mathcal F)_p=0, and torsion-free if this holds at every point.

Used by Proof
Lemma

Lemma 2.17

KBWC

Let W\subset\Delta be an open disc, possibly W=\Delta. If o(c)|_W=0, then there is a line bundle \mathcal L_W\in\operatorname{Pic}(\mathcal X_W) with c_1(\mathcal L_W)=\widetilde c|_{\mathcal X_W}. A Hermitian metric on \mathcal L_W gives a smooth real d-closed (1,1)-form \eta on \mathcal X_W whose restriction \eta_t represents the real image of c.

Proof of Lemma 2.17

Theorems 2.13 and 2.15 make the Leray spectral sequence over the Stein disc W degenerate for \mathcal O in the form

H^2(\mathcal X_W,\mathcal O_{\mathcal X_W}) \simeq H^0(W,R^2\pi_*\mathcal O_{\mathcal X}).

Thus the image of \widetilde c in H^2(\mathcal X_W,\mathcal O) is zero. Exactness of the exponential sequence

0\longrightarrow\mathbb Z\longrightarrow\mathcal O \xrightarrow{\exp(2\pi i\,\cdot)}\mathcal O^*\longrightarrow1

produces \mathcal L_W, as in the top row of (?). The normalized Chern curvature of a smooth Hermitian metric has the asserted properties.

Lemma

Lemma 2.18 (Discrete support and finite torsion order; cf.)

DTCT

If o(c) vanishes on a nonempty open subset of \Delta, then

S(c):=\operatorname{Supp}\bigl(\mathcal O_\Delta\,o(c)\bigr)

is a possibly empty discrete complex-analytic subset. For every p\in\Delta, with local coordinate z=t-p, there is a least integer N(p)\ge0 such that

z^{N(p)} o(c)=0

near p. Here N(p)=0 if and only if p\notin S(c); at a point of S(c) one necessarily has N(p)\ge1. In particular, o(c)=0 on \Delta if and only if S(c)=\varnothing, equivalently if N(p)=0 for every p.

Used by Proof, Proof
Proof of Lemma 2.18

\mathcal F is coherent by Theorem 2.13, so its cyclic subsheaf \mathcal N:=\mathcal O_\Delta o(c) is coherent. Its support is the zero set of its annihilator ideal sheaf and is therefore analytic. It is proper because o(c) vanishes on a nonempty open set. Since \Delta is a connected complex curve, this proper analytic subset is discrete.

If p\notin S(c), the germ o(c)_p is zero, hence the section vanishes on a neighbourhood of p. Thus the least exponent there is N(p)=0.

Fix p\in S(c) and put R:=\mathcal O_{\Delta,p}\simeq\mathbb C\{z\}, where z=t-p. The ring \mathbb C\{z\} consists of convergent power-series germs. Every nonzero germ has the form z^m u, where m\ge0 is its vanishing order and u is a unit. Choosing the least vanishing order among the nonzero elements of an ideal shows that every nonzero ideal is (z^m). This is the discrete valuation ring property used here.

The cyclic stalk has the presentation

\mathcal N_p\simeq R/I_p,\qquad I_p:=\{g\in R:g\,o(c)_p=0\}.

Here I_p\ne R because \mathcal N_p\ne0. Also I_p\ne0: otherwise the coherent kernel of \mathcal O_\Delta\to\mathcal N would vanish near p, giving \mathcal N\simeq\mathcal O_\Delta there, contrary to the isolated support. Hence I_p=(z^N) for some N\ge1, and

\mathcal N_p\simeq R/(z^N),\qquad z^N\mathcal N_p=0.

In particular, \mathcal N_p is a finitely generated torsion module, of length N. The equality z^No(c)_p=0 is an equality of germs, so z^No(c)=0 on a sufficiently small neighbourhood of p. Since I_p=(z^N), no smaller power annihilates the generator, so N=N(p). This proves (2.18) and the assertions about the zero exponent.

Lemma

Lemma 2.19

D33K

Let \Lambda\subset\mathscr C be an irreducible component with fixed integral divisor class c, and suppose o(c)|_D=0 on a disc D\subset\Delta. Let \eta be the curvature representative given by Lemma 2.17. Whenever t\in D and X_t satisfies the \partial\bar\partial-lemma, every Z\in\Lambda_t satisfies

\int_ZG_t=\int_{X_t}\eta_t\wedge G_t.

The right-hand side is smooth in t, so these masses are uniformly bounded on compact subsets of D, independently of Z.

Uses Lemma 2.17 · Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 2.19

The currents [Z] and \eta_t are real, closed, of type (1,1), and represent the same real class. The current \partial\bar\partial-Lemma 2.9 gives [Z]-\eta_t=i\partial_t\bar\partial_t\Phi_Z for a real 0-current \Phi_Z. Pairing with G_t and using \partial_t\bar\partial_tG_t=0 gives (2.19). Smooth fiber integration proves the last assertion.

Lemma

Lemma 2.20 (Strongly Gauduchon properness)

JTZU

If f:\mathcal X\to B admits a relative strongly Gauduchon form, then the restriction of \mu:\mathcal C_{n-1}(\mathcal X/B)\to B to each connected component, and hence to each irreducible component, is proper over B.

Uses Definition 2.10 · Used by Proof, Proof
Definition

Definition 2.21 (Good filling)

Y8AL

The family \Gamma is a good filling if:

  1. the evaluation G_\Gamma\to\mathcal X is surjective;

  2. the generic member of the tautological family is irreducible.

A good filling need not be an irreducible component of the cycle space. Conversely, being a component does not imply either of these conditions or properness over the base.

Proposition

Proposition 2.22 (Good-filling inequality)

L9CX

Let B be a connected complex curve and let \Gamma\subset\mathcal C_{n-1}(\mathcal X/B) be a B-proper good filling. If the generic fiber of Q_\Gamma\to B has dimension at least a, then a(X_b)\ge a for every b\in B.

Proof of Proposition 2.22

Barlet proves in [Ba15, Lemma 2.2.2] that Q_\Gamma\to B is proper. His exceptional set T_\Gamma has codimension at least two and is therefore empty when \dim B=1, by [Ba15, Lemma 2.2.1]. Let q be the generic fiber dimension of the proper map Q_\Gamma\to B. On a dense open subset its fibers have dimension q, and q\ge a by hypothesis. Apply Barlet’s fiber inequality [Ba15, Lemma 2.2.3] to that dense set; his conclusion is a(X_b)\ge q\ge a for every b\in B.

Proposition

Proposition 2.23 (The local good filling)

8TP0

After shrinking U, there are an integer a_U\ge a_* and an irreducible component

\Gamma_U\subset\mathcal C_{n-1}(\mathcal X_U/U)

such that:

  1. \Gamma_U\to U is proper and \Gamma_U is a good filling;

  2. the generic fiber of the relative Kodaira image Q_{\Gamma_U}\to U has dimension a_U;

  3. a(X_t)=a_U away from a countable union of proper analytic subsets of U, and a(X_t)\ge a_U for every t\in U.

Proof of Proposition 2.23

Every fiber over U is strongly Gauduchon. A relative strongly Gauduchon form therefore exists by [Ba15, Lemma 3.0.7 and the following remark]. Lemma 2.20 makes every connected component of the relative divisor space proper over U.

Every irreducible component, being closed in one of these connected components, is therefore proper. We may therefore apply [Ba15, Proposition 4.0.8 and its proof].

By the Baire theorem, choose t_1\in U outside the countable union of exceptional loci in that proof, including the bigness and non-dominance loci. Choose the fiberwise good filling \Gamma_1\subset\mathcal C_{n-1}(X_{t_1}) which gives the algebraic reduction there, and let \Gamma_U be the relative irreducible component selected by Barlet.

This component dominates U, has generically irreducible members, and its relative Kodaira image has generic dimension

a_U=a(X_{t_1}).

We check the first condition in Definition 2.21, since it is not a consequence of the word “component.” Barlet observes in [Ba15, § 2.2] that the tautological incidence graph of an irreducible family whose generic member is irreducible is itself irreducible. The evaluation of that graph in \mathcal X_U is proper; hence its image Y is an irreducible closed analytic subset by Theorem 2.5. It dominates U and contains the whole fiber X_{t_1} because \Gamma_1\subset(\Gamma_U)_{t_1} is a fiberwise good filling.

Every fiber of the incidence graph contains an (n-1)-cycle, so \dim Y\ge n. If \dim Y=n, the inclusion X_{t_1}\subset Y between irreducible n-dimensional analytic sets would give Y=X_{t_1}, contradicting dominance over U. Hence \dim Y=n+1 and, since \mathcal X_U is irreducible of that dimension, Y=\mathcal X_U. Thus \Gamma_U is a good filling.

Finally, Theorem 2.7 gives the assertions in (iii). Since a(X_{t_1})\ge a_*, we have a_U\ge a_*.

Lemma

Lemma 2.24

36JA

Let Y be a reduced complex space, let Y^\circ\subset Y be open, and let A^\circ be an irreducible component of Y^\circ. Then there is an irreducible component A of Y such that

A^\circ\subset A\cap Y^\circ.

Moreover, A^\circ is an irreducible component of A\cap Y^\circ, \dim A=\dim A^\circ, and A^\circ contains a nonempty subset which is open in A. In particular, with

\mathscr C:=\mathcal C_{n-1}(\mathcal X/\Delta),\qquad \mu:\mathscr C\to\Delta,

there is an irreducible component \Gamma\subset\mathscr C satisfying

\Gamma_U\subset\Gamma\cap\mu^{-1}(U),

and \Gamma_U contains a nonempty open subset of \Gamma.

Proof of Lemma 2.24

Complex spaces are locally Noetherian, and their local irreducible components are locally finite. In a neighbourhood meeting only finitely many local components, the intersections of the local branches of A^\circ with the other components are proper analytic subsets. We may therefore choose a point a\in A^\circ which lies on no other local component of Y^\circ and at which the germ of A^\circ is irreducible.

A local irreducible component through a is contained in an irreducible component A of Y. Hence A\cap A^\circ is a closed analytic subset of the irreducible space A^\circ which contains a nonempty open subset. The identity principle gives A^\circ\subset A.

If an irreducible closed analytic subset of A\cap Y^\circ contains A^\circ, then it is also an irreducible closed analytic subset of Y^\circ; maximality of A^\circ forces equality. Thus A^\circ is an irreducible component of A\cap Y^\circ.

The other irreducible components of A\cap Y^\circ form a locally finite family, and their intersections with A^\circ are proper analytic subsets. Choose a point of A^\circ outside their union and shrink a neighbourhood in A\cap Y^\circ. The resulting nonempty subset is open in A and is contained in A^\circ. In particular, \dim A=\dim A^\circ.

One cannot in general strengthen (2.24) to A\cap Y^\circ=A^\circ: for the irreducible curve t=y^2, the inverse image of a small simply connected disc away from t=0 has two components. Apply the valid containment statement to Y=\mathscr C and Y^\circ=\mu^{-1}(U).

Lemma

Lemma 3.1 (Phase lemma)

804K

Let N\ge0 be an integer and let A\in\mathcal C^N(D_0,\mathbb C), where D_0 is a neighbourhood of 0 in \mathbb C. Suppose that there are a real constant C and \varepsilon>0 such that

\operatorname{Re}\!\left(z^{-N}A(z)\right)\ge-C \qquad(0<|z|<\varepsilon).

Then A(z)=O(|z|^N), or equivalently z^{-N}A(z) is bounded on a punctured neighbourhood of 0.

Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 3.1

For N=0, continuity suffices. Assume N\ge1 and write z=x+iy. For a multi-index \alpha=(\alpha_1,\alpha_2), use the notation |\alpha|=\alpha_1+\alpha_2, \alpha!=\alpha_1!\alpha_2!, (x,y)^\alpha=x^{\alpha_1}y^{\alpha_2}, and D^\alpha=\partial_x^{\alpha_1}\partial_y^{\alpha_2}. For 1\le m\le N, apply the one-variable Taylor formula with integral remainder [KL03, formula (1)] to g(s)=A(sx,sy), 0\le s\le1. The multinomial chain rule gives

\begin{aligned} A(x,y)&=\sum_{j=0}^{m-1}\ \sum_{|\alpha|=j} \frac{D^\alpha A(0)}{\alpha!}(x,y)^\alpha+R_m(x,y), \\ R_m(x,y)&=m\sum_{|\alpha|=m}\frac{(x,y)^\alpha}{\alpha!} \int_0^1(1-s)^{m-1}D^\alpha A(sx,sy)\,ds. \end{aligned}

Continuity bounds the derivatives on a small closed disc, so |R_m(x,y)|\le C_m(|x|+|y|)^m=O(|z|^m), uniformly in the angular variable. If all derivatives of order less than N vanish at 0, take m=N to obtain the conclusion.

Otherwise let k<N be the least order of a nonzero derivative. The nonzero homogeneous Taylor polynomial of degree k has the unique expression

P_k(z,\bar z)=\sum_{a+b=k}c_{ab}z^a\bar z^b.

Taking m=k+1 in (Proof) yields

A(re^{i\theta}) =r^k\sum_{a+b=k}c_{ab}e^{i(a-b)\theta}+O(r^{k+1}),

with a remainder uniform in \theta. Set

G_k(\theta)=\sum_{a+b=k}c_{ab}e^{i(a-b-N)\theta}, \qquad F_k(\theta)=G_k(\theta)+\overline{G_k(\theta)}.

It follows that

2\operatorname{Re}\!\left(z^{-N}A(z)\right) =r^{k-N}\bigl(F_k(\theta)+E(r,\theta)\bigr), \qquad \sup_\theta|E(r,\theta)|\le C_Er.

The frequencies of G_k are the pairwise distinct integers m_{ab}=a-b-N=2a-k-N\le k-N<0; those of \overline{G_k} are positive. Thus F_k cannot vanish identically: Fourier orthogonality would otherwise give

0=\frac1{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} F_k(\theta)e^{-im_{ab}\theta}\,d\theta=c_{ab}

for every a+b=k, contradicting P_k\ne0. Moreover, F_k has no zero-frequency term and hence has mean zero. Being real, continuous and nonzero, it is negative somewhere. Choose \theta_0 and \delta>0 with F_k(\theta_0)=-\delta. Along this fixed ray, (Proof) becomes

2\operatorname{Re}\!\left( (re^{i\theta_0})^{-N}A(re^{i\theta_0})\right) =r^{k-N}\bigl(-\delta+O(r)\bigr)\longrightarrow-\infty.

This contradicts (3.1) and proves A(z)=O(|z|^N).

Lemma

Lemma 3.2

NGMR
  1. Every vertical component of \mathscr C is compact.

  2. For every horizontal component \Lambda, the restriction \Lambda^*:=\Lambda\cap\mu^{-1}(\Delta^*)\to\Delta^* is proper and surjective, and \Lambda^* is dense in \Lambda. Its fixed integral class c\in H^2(M,\mathbb Z) satisfies o(c)|_{\Delta^*}=0.

Used by Proof, Proof
Proof of Lemma 3.2

If \mu(\Lambda)=\{s\}, then \Lambda lies in the closed analytic fiber \mu^{-1}(s)=\mathcal C_{n-1}(X_s). By its maximality as an irreducible closed analytic subset of \mathscr C, it is also an irreducible component of \mathcal C_{n-1}(X_s). Hence \Lambda is compact by Theorem 2.1.

Suppose now that \Lambda is horizontal. Lemma 2.6 makes its projection open and \Lambda^* dense in \Lambda. Choose a nonempty disc U\Subset\mu(\Lambda)\cap\Delta^*. Under an Ehresmann trivialization, Lemma 2.3 gives one Poincaré-dual class c for every divisor in \Lambda. For each t\in U there is a divisor Z\in\Lambda_t, and c=c_1(\mathcal O_{X_t}(Z)) has zero image in H^2(X_t,\mathcal O_{X_t}). The exponential sequence and Lemma 2.14 imply o(c)|_U=0. Lemma 2.18 now shows that S(c) is discrete and that every obstruction germ is annihilated by a finite power of a local coordinate. Since R^2\pi_*\mathcal O_{\mathcal X} is locally free, hence torsion-free, on \Delta^*, these germs vanish there. Thus

o(c)|_{\Delta^*}=0,\qquad S(c)\subset\{0\}.

Only nonemptiness of \Lambda_t on U is used, not incidence surjectivity or irreducibility of the divisors themselves.

On a sufficiently small disc D\Subset\Delta^*, Lemma 2.17 supplies a total-space line bundle with Chern class c and a smooth curvature representative \eta. Lemma 2.19 gives, for every t\in D and every Z\in\Lambda_t,

\int_ZG_t=\int_{X_t}\eta_t\wedge G_t.

The right-hand side is smooth in t and independent of Z. A finite cover of any compact K\Subset\Delta^* by smaller discs with compact closures in such D gives a uniform mass bound on \Lambda\cap\mu^{-1}(K). Comparison with a fixed Hermitian metric gives a uniform volume bound. The cycles have supports in \pi^{-1}(K), and their parameter set is closed, so Lemma 2.4 makes this set compact. Thus \Lambda^*\to\Delta^* is proper. Its image is analytic by Remmert’s Theorem 2.5 and contains U; hence it is all of \Delta^*.

Lemma

Lemma 3.3 (A primitive from finite-order torsion)

I9ZZ

Let c\in H^2(M,\mathbb Z), let D_0\subset\Delta be a disc about 0, and suppose t^No(c)=0 on D_0 for an integer N\ge0. There are a real smooth d-closed two-form \alpha representing the real image of the corresponding total-space class and a smooth absolute (0,1)-form u on \mathcal X_{D_0} such that

\bar\partial_{\mathcal X}u=t^N\alpha^{0,2}_{\mathcal X}.

In particular, \bar\partial_tu_t=t^N\alpha_t^{0,2} on each fiber.

Used by Proof
Proof of Lemma 3.3

An Ehresmann trivialization identifies c with a total-space topological class on \mathcal X_{D_0}. Choose a real smooth closed representative \alpha of its real image. Coherence, Cartan’s Theorem 2.15, and the Leray spectral sequence give

H^2(\mathcal X_{D_0},\mathcal O_{\mathcal X_{D_0}}) \simeq H^0(D_0,R^2\pi_*\mathcal O_{\mathcal X}).

Under the Dolbeault resolution, o(c) corresponds to the class of \alpha^{0,2}_{\mathcal X}, which is \bar\partial_{\mathcal X}-closed since d\alpha=0. Multiplication by t^N on the right corresponds to multiplication by the holomorphic function \pi^*t^N on the left. Thus t^No(c)=0 says that t^N\alpha^{0,2}_{\mathcal X} has zero Dolbeault class. The fine Dolbeault resolution supplies a global smooth u satisfying (3.3), also on the noncompact manifold \mathcal X_{D_0}. Restriction to a fiber commutes with \bar\partial, giving the final assertion.

Proposition

Proposition 3.4 (Componentwise mass bound)

EC2M

Let \Lambda be any irreducible component of \mathscr C. For every compact set K\Subset\Delta, there is a constant C_{\Lambda,K} such that

0\le\int_ZG_t\le C_{\Lambda,K} \qquad(t\in K,\ Z\in\Lambda_t).

No good-filling assumption on \Lambda is required.

Used by Proof
Proof of Proposition 3.4

If \Lambda is vertical, it is compact by Lemma 3.2. Continuity of cycle integration, Lemma 2.12, gives the bound. Hence assume \Lambda is horizontal, and let c be its fixed integral class. Lemma 3.2 gives the bound on compact subsets of \Delta^* and nonemptiness of \Lambda_t for every t\ne0. It remains to control the masses near 0.

Since S(c)\subset\{0\}, Lemma 2.18 gives a disc D_0 about 0 and the finite exponent N=N(0)\ge0 with t^No(c)=0 on D_0. Here N=0 precisely when the obstruction vanishes near 0. This finite-order control, rather than vanishing of the obstruction itself, is the essential input for the following construction. Lemma 3.3 supplies a real smooth d-closed two-form \alpha representing the real image of c and a smooth absolute (0,1)-form u on \mathcal X_{D_0} such that

\bar\partial_{\mathcal X}u=t^N\alpha^{0,2}_{\mathcal X}.

For t\ne0, put

\beta_t=t^{-N}u_t+\bar t^{-N}\bar u_t, \qquad \eta_t=\alpha_t-d_t\beta_t.

The form \eta_t is real and d_t-closed. The fiberwise primitive identity and its conjugate give

(d_t\beta_t)^{0,2}=t^{-N}\bar\partial_tu_t=\alpha_t^{0,2}, \qquad (d_t\beta_t)^{2,0}=\bar t^{-N}\partial_t\bar u_t=\alpha_t^{2,0}.

Thus the two unwanted components cancel, so \eta_t is of type (1,1). Subtracting the exact form d_t\beta_t leaves its real de Rham class unchanged. For every Z\in\Lambda_t, the current [Z]-\eta_t is d_t-exact. Since X_t satisfies the \partial\bar\partial-lemma for t\ne0, Lemma 2.9 and pairing with G_t eliminate this difference. Since d_t(\beta_t\wedge G_t)=d_t\beta_t\wedge G_t-\beta_t\wedge d_tG_t, Stokes’ theorem gives

\int_{X_t}\eta_t\wedge G_t =\int_{X_t}\alpha_t\wedge G_t-\int_{X_t}\beta_t\wedge d_tG_t.

Only u_t\wedge\partial_tG_t and its conjugate have top bidegree in the last pairing. Consequently

\begin{aligned} \int_ZG_t &=\int_{X_t}\eta_t\wedge G_t =B(t)+2\operatorname{Re}\!\left(t^{-N}A(t)\right), \\ B(t)&:=\int_{X_t}\alpha_t\wedge G_t, \qquad A(t):=-\int_{X_t}u_t\wedge\partial_tG_t. \end{aligned}

Here reality of G_t gives \int_{X_t}\bar u_t\wedge\bar\partial_tG_t =\overline{\int_{X_t}u_t\wedge\partial_tG_t}, explaining the factor 2 and the real part. Smooth fiber integration shows that both A and B are smooth across 0, B is real, and the expression is independent of Z within the fixed component and fiber.

Choose a disc 0\in D\Subset D_0. For every t\in D\setminus\{0\}, Lemma 3.2 supplies an effective divisor in \Lambda_t. Thus (Proof) is nonnegative in every angular direction. Boundedness of B gives

\operatorname{Re}\!\left(t^{-N}A(t)\right) \ge -\tfrac12\sup_{\overline D}|B|.

For N\ge1, Lemma 3.1 implies A(t)=O(|t|^N), so (Proof) is bounded above near 0. For N=0, boundedness follows directly from smoothness of A and B. This proves a uniform bound for all divisors of \Lambda over a sufficiently small punctured disc. No estimate on the full form t^{-N}u_t is needed.

Density of \Lambda^* and continuity of cycle integration extend the same bound to every member of \Lambda_0. Choose r>0 small enough that the bound holds for |t|\le r. For any compact K\Subset\Delta, the remaining parameters K\cap\{|t|\ge r/2\} form a compact subset of \Delta^*, where Lemma 3.2 provides a mass bound. Combining the two bounds proves (3.4) on the original base \Delta.

Proposition

Proposition 3.5 (Properness of every component)

S87O

Every irreducible component of \mathscr C is proper over \Delta. Every horizontal component maps surjectively onto \Delta.

Used by Proof
Proof of Proposition 3.5

Fix an irreducible component \Lambda of \mathscr C and a compact set K\Subset\Delta. Proposition 3.4 bounds the G_t-masses of all its divisors over K. Since G_t is smooth and strictly positive, comparison on the compact set \pi^{-1}(K) with a fixed Hermitian metric bounds their volumes. The set \Lambda\cap\mu^{-1}(K) is closed, so Lemma 2.4 makes it compact. This is properness over \Delta. For horizontal \Lambda, its image is closed and contains \Delta^* by Lemma 3.2; it therefore equals \Delta.

Remark

Remark 3.6 (The good-filling route)

HDPG

One can alternatively follow a selected local good filling rather than use Barlet’s componentwise criterion at the last step. The local algebraic-dimension theorem on \Delta^* first gives its common very general value a_{\mathrm{gen}}. If this value is positive, Proposition 2.23 supplies \Gamma_U whose generic Kodaira-image dimension is a_U\ge a_{\mathrm{gen}}. Lemma 2.24 embeds it as a local component of a full global component \Gamma. Proposition 3.5 makes \Gamma proper over \Delta.

To recover a good filling, consider the addition map for pairs of nonzero effective relative cycles whose sum belongs to \Gamma. Locally over \Gamma this map is proper: the masses of both summands are bounded by that of the sum, Bishop compactness gives convergent subsequences, and the monotonicity inequality gives a positive lower bound for nonzero cycle masses over a compact part of the base. Neither summand can therefore disappear in the limit. Remmert’s Theorem 2.5 makes the reducible-cycle locus closed analytic. Since \Gamma_U supplies irreducible members on a nonempty open subset, the generic member of \Gamma is irreducible. The incidence image is closed analytic by properness and Remmert’s Theorem 2.5; it contains \mathcal X_U, hence equals \mathcal X. Thus \Gamma is a good filling.

One must also retain the local Kodaira-image dimension. On the general locus of U, write d=\dim\Gamma_{U,t} and choose the common open subset \Omega_t where the local and global parameter spaces agree. Its complement R_t in \Gamma_{U,t} has dimension at most d-1. The incidence graph over R_t has dimension at most d+n-2, so over a general x\in X_t it contains no component of the pure (d-1)-dimensional local incidence cycle. That cycle is therefore recovered, with multiplicities, from its restriction to \Omega_t. Barlet’s relative Kodaira construction [Ba15, § 2.2] identifies the local and global incidence cycles on this open set. Equality of global incidence cycles implies equality of local ones, giving generic image dimension q\ge a_U. Proposition 2.22 concludes a(X_0)\ge q\ge a_U\ge a_{\mathrm{gen}}; the case a_{\mathrm{gen}}=0 is immediate. The proof above retains the same phase calculation but uses componentwise properness to invoke Barlet’s theorem directly, so neither these good-filling checks nor the local–global Kodaira comparison need be repeated.

Proposition

Proposition A.1

9HJ8

Let \pi: \mathcal{X}\rightarrow\Delta be a family such that at least one of the following conditions holds:

  1. the family \pi is smooth and every fiber X_{t} for t\in\Delta is Moishezon;

  2. each (not necessarily projective) compact variety X_{t} for t\in\Delta has only canonical singularities, and uncountably many fibers are of general type.

Then the m-genus P_{m}(X_{t}) for each positive integer m is independent of t\in\Delta.

Used by Proof
Corollary

Corollary A.2

Z71N

Let \pi: \mathcal X\rightarrow\Delta be a smooth family with uncountably many Moishezon fibers. Then the m-genus P_{m}(X_{t}) is independent of t\in\Delta for any positive integer m.

Proof of Corollary A.2

This is a direct corollary of Theorem 1.5 and Proposition A.1.

Remark

Remark A.3

2I2K

A (possibly incomplete) overview of progress on the deformation invariance of plurigenera can be found in [RT22, Introduction].

Corollary

Corollary A.4

89F7

Let \pi: \mathcal X\rightarrow\Delta be a smooth family with uncountably many projective fibers. Then \pi is pseudo-projective.

Used by Proof
Proof of Corollary A.4

The proof is implicitly contained in [RT22, Lemma 4.25, Remark 4.26]. In fact, all fibers are Moishezon by Theorem 1.5 and according to the argument in Corollary A.5 below or [RT21, RT22], it is not difficult to find a (global) line bundle \mathcal{L} on \mathcal{X} such that its restriction to any general fiber X_{t_0} is very ample and h^{0}(X_t, \mathcal{L}|_{X_t}) is constant for any t\in \Delta sufficiently close to t_0. Then by (the proof of) [RT22, Theorem 1.8], the global line bundle \mathcal{L} induces a bimeromorphic map \Phi from \mathcal{X} to a subvariety \mathcal{W} of \mathbb{P}^{m}\times \Delta over \Delta for some positive integer m, which implies that \Phi is biholomorphic on \mathcal{X}\setminus{\mathcal{S}} for some proper subvariety \mathcal{S} of \mathcal{X}. So R:=\pi(\mathcal{S}) is a proper analytic subset of \Delta since the restriction \Phi_{t_0}:X_{t_0}\rightarrow W_{t_0} to the fiber of \mathcal{W} over t_0 is biholomorphic. So \Phi is biholomorphic at least on \mathcal{X}\setminus{\mathcal{S}} by the definition of \mathcal{S}, and thus \mathcal{W} is smooth outside {\pi_{\mathcal{W}}^{-1}(R)} for \pi_{\mathcal{W}}:\mathcal{W}\rightarrow \Delta since \mathcal{X} is smooth. Moreover, \mathcal{W} is bimeromorphic to \mathcal{X} and \pi_{\mathcal{W}}:\mathcal{W}\rightarrow \Delta is a projective morphism. By Remmert’s elimination of indeterminacy [Re57] and Hironaka’s Chow lemma [Hi75, Corollaries 1 and 2], one modifies \mathcal{W} to obtain a complex manifold \mathcal{Y} such that the map \mathcal{Y}\rightarrow {\mathcal{W}} over \Delta is a bimeromorphic morphism with \mathcal{Y}\setminus \pi_{\mathcal{Y}}^{-1}(R)\cong\mathcal{W}\setminus{\pi_{\mathcal{W}}^{-1}(R)} as \mathcal{W}\setminus{\pi_{\mathcal{W}}^{-1}(R)}\cong\mathcal{X}\setminus{\mathcal{S}}. Hence, \pi_{\mathcal{Y}}: \mathcal{Y}\rightarrow \Delta is the desired projective morphism, and the morphism \pi is pseudo-projective.

Corollary

Corollary A.5

3R2I

Let \pi: \mathcal{X}\rightarrow\Delta be a smooth family. Define the projective locus of \pi as

\mathcal{P}(\pi):= \{t\in \Delta: \text{$X_{t}$ is projective}\}.

Then \mathcal{P}(\pi) is either at most countable or a dense Zariski open subset of \Delta.

Proof

Proof

076Z

This follows directly from Corollary A.4. For the reader’s convenience, we give a more elementary proof here, also providing further details for the proof of Corollary A.4. Assume that there are uncountably many projective fibers in \pi.

(step)(step)

Step.

Construct a global line bundle \mathcal L over {\mathcal X} such that \mathcal L|_{X_{t_0}} is ample for some t_0\in\Delta.

By the exponential sequence, as in (?), one has the commutative diagram of exact sequences

\xymatrix@C=0.5cm{ \cdots \ar[r]^{} & H^1(\mathcal{X}, \mathcal{O}^{*}_{\mathcal{X}})\ar[d]_{} \ar[r]^{} & H^2(\mathcal{X}, \mathbb{Z}) \ar[d]_{} \ar[r]^{}\ar[d]^{\cong} & H^2(\mathcal{X}, \mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}})\ar[d]\ar[r]^{} & \cdots \\ \cdots \ar[r] &H^{1}({X_{t}},\mathcal{O}_{X_{t}}^*) \ar[r]^{} & H^{2}(X_{t},\mathbb{Z}) \ar[r] & H^{2}(X_{t},\mathcal{O}_{{X_{t}}})\ar[r]&\cdots}

for any t\in \Delta. Applying the Leray spectral sequence to \pi for the sheaf \mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}}, one obtains the exact sequence

\xymatrix@C=0.6cm{ H^1(\Delta,R^1\pi_*\mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}})\ar[r] & H^2({\mathcal X},\mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}}) \ar[r]^{} & H^0(\Delta,R^2\pi_*\mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}}) \ar[r] & 0. }

Since \Delta is Stein, Theorems 2.13.(i) and 2.15 give H^{1}(\Delta,R^1\pi_*\mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}})=0, and thus

H^2({\mathcal X},\mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}})\cong H^0(\Delta,R^2\pi_*\mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}}),

as in the Leray argument of Section ?.

Let c:=c_{1}(A) be the first Chern class of an ample line bundle {A} on some fiber X_{t}, and denote by c\in H^{2}(X_{t},\mathbb Z) the element in H^2({\mathcal X},\mathbb Z). The composed morphism

H^2({\mathcal X},\mathbb Z)\subset H^2({\mathcal X},\mathbb C) \to H^0(\Delta,R^2\pi_*\mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}})

induces a section s_{c}\in H^0(\Delta,R^2\pi_*\mathcal O_{{\mathcal X}}), namely the obstruction section o(c) of Section ?. By Theorem 1.5, every fiber X_t is Moishezon and hence satisfies the \partial\bar\partial-lemma. The proof of Lemma 2.14 shows that h^{0,2}(X_t) is constant on \Delta. Thus, by Theorem 2.13.(iii), R^{2}\pi_{*}{\mathcal O_{\mathcal X}} is locally free over \Delta and the map

R^2\pi_*\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}(t):=(R^2\pi_*\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}})_t\otimes \mathbb{C}(t)\rightarrow H^{2}(X_{t},\mathcal{O}_{{X_{t}}})

is bijective for each t\in\Delta. Thus, the zero locus Z_{c} of s_{c} is an analytic subset of \Delta. Since there is an uncountable subset T\subseteq \Delta such that all the fibers X_{t} for t\in T are projective, one has

\bigcup_{c}Z_{c}\supseteq T,

where the union is taken over all integral classes c_1(L_t)\in H^{2}(X,\mathbb Z) of ample line bundles L_t on fibers X_t with t\in T. Here X is the underlying differentiable manifold of the family’s fibers. Since a countable union of proper analytic subsets is still countable, there is a class c with Z_c=\Delta, so o(c)=0. Lemma 2.17, applied with W=\Delta, gives a global line bundle \mathcal L with c_1(\mathcal L)=\widetilde c. Its restriction to some X_{t_0} has the same first Chern class as an ample line bundle, and is therefore ample by the Nakai–Moishezon criterion.

Step.

Show that \mathcal L|_{X_s} is ample outside a proper closed analytic subset of \Delta.

Following the proof of Grothendieck’s theorem [Gr61, Théorème 2.1], we give the details that make the exceptional set analytic over the whole disc. Choose m>0 such that \mathcal E:=\mathcal L^{\otimes m} restricts to a very ample line bundle on X_{t_0} and H^1(X_{t_0},\mathcal E|_{X_{t_0}})=0. By Theorem 2.13.(i), \mathcal F:=\pi_*\mathcal E is coherent. Moreover, by [Gr61, Corollaire 1.5], it is locally free near t_0 and

\mathcal F_{t_0}/\mathfrak m_{t_0}\mathcal F_{t_0} \simeq H^0(X_{t_0},\mathcal E|_{X_{t_0}}).

By Theorem 2.15, applied to \mathcal I_{t_0}\mathcal F on the Stein disc, global sections of \mathcal F surject onto this fiber. Thus we can choose N=h^0(X_{t_0},\mathcal E|_{X_{t_0}}) global sections \sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_N of \mathcal E whose restrictions form a basis on X_{t_0}. They define a meromorphic map over \Delta,

\phi:\mathcal X\dashrightarrow\mathbb P^{N-1}\times\Delta,

whose restriction \phi_{t_0} is an embedding. We do not require these sections to span the complete linear system on any other fiber.

To describe the base points and the failure of fiberwise immersivity by a single closed analytic set, take local submersion coordinates (z_1,\ldots,z_n,t) and a holomorphic frame e of \mathcal E. Write \sigma_i=f_i e and set

J=\begin{pmatrix} f_1&\cdots&f_N\\ \partial f_1/\partial z_1&\cdots&\partial f_N/\partial z_1\\ \vdots&&\vdots\\ \partial f_1/\partial z_n&\cdots&\partial f_N/\partial z_n \end{pmatrix}.

Changes of frame or submersion coordinates multiply J on the left by an invertible holomorphic matrix. Consequently, its (n+1)\times(n+1) minors define a global closed analytic subset Z\subset\mathcal X. At a base point its first row vanishes, so the point belongs to Z. Wherever f_i\ne0, elementary row and column operations give

\operatorname{rank}J =1+\operatorname{rank} \bigl(d_{\mathcal X/\Delta}(f_j/f_i)\bigr)_{j\ne i}.

Thus, away from the base locus, Z is exactly the rank-defect locus of the relative differential of \phi. Since \phi_{t_0} is an embedding, Z\cap X_{t_0}=\varnothing.

By Theorem 2.5, \pi(Z) is a proper closed analytic subset of \Delta, hence is discrete. For U:=\Delta\setminus\pi(Z) and s\in U, the sections have no common zero on X_s and define a holomorphic immersion \phi_s:X_s\to\mathbb P^{N-1} with

\mathcal E|_{X_s}\simeq\phi_s^*\mathcal O_{\mathbb P^{N-1}}(1).

The pullback of the Fubini–Study metric has strictly positive curvature, so \mathcal E|_{X_s}, and hence \mathcal L|_{X_s}, is ample by the Kodaira embedding theorem. In particular, every X_s with s\in U is projective. The nonprojective locus is a subset of the closed discrete set \pi(Z), hence is itself closed analytic in \Delta. Therefore \mathcal P(\pi) is a dense analytic Zariski open subset.

Corollary

Corollary A.6

NYDC

Let \pi: \mathcal X\rightarrow\Delta be a smooth family with uncountably many Moishezon fibers. Then the restriction of

\mu: \mathcal{C}_{n-1}(\mathcal X/\Delta)\rightarrow \Delta

to each irreducible component of \mathcal{C}_{n-1}(\mathcal X/\Delta) is proper over \Delta.

Proof of Corollary A.6

It follows from Theorem 1.5 and Lemma 2.20.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2407.02022v3 by Sheng Rao, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2407/2407.02022.jsonl.