arXiv reader

Fischer’s approach to deformation of coactions

Alcides Buss and Siegfried Echterhoff

arXiv
2507.03563v2 · PDF · 16 December 2025
Categories
math.OA
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

This paper explores a novel approach to the deformation of C^*-algebras via coactions of locally compact groups, emphasizing Fischer’s construction in the context of maximal coactions. We establish a rigorous framework for understanding how deformations arise from group coactions, extending previous work by Bhowmick, Neshveyev, and Sangha. Using Landstad duality, we compare different deformation procedures, demonstrating their equivalence and efficiency in constructing twisted versions of given C^*-algebras. Our results provide deeper insights into the interplay between exotic crossed products, coaction duality, and operator algebra deformations, offering a unified perspective for further generalizations.

Items 22

Proposition

Proposition 2.4

IF3W

Suppose that \|\cdot\|_\mu and A\rtimes_{\delta}\widehat{G}\rtimes_{\widehat\delta,\mu}G are as above. Then the double dual coaction

\widehat{\widehat{\delta}\,}:A\rtimes_\delta \widehat{G}\rtimes_{\widehat{\delta}}G\to \mathcal M(A\rtimes_\delta \widehat{G}\rtimes_{\widehat{\delta}}G\otimes C^*(G))

factors through a (double dual) coaction \widehat{\widehat{\delta}\,}_{\!\!\mu} of G on A\rtimes_{\delta}\widehat{G}\rtimes_{\widehat\delta,\mu}G which corresponds to the coaction \widetilde{\delta} on A\otimes \mathcal K via the isomorphism \Psi_\mu.

Proof of Proposition 2.4

This is a direct consequence of [EKQ]*Lemma 3.8, which states that the surjection \Psi_\mu of  (?) is \widehat{\widehat\delta}-\tilde\delta equivariant.

Proposition

Proposition 2.6

W2K4

Suppose that \delta:A\to \mathcal M(A\otimes C^*(G)) is a maximal coaction. Then, for every duality crossed-product A\rtimes_\delta\widehat{G}\rtimes_{\widehat{\delta},\mu}G, there exists a unique quotient A_\mu of A such that \delta factors through a \mu-coaction \delta_\mu:A_\mu\to\mathcal M(A_\mu\otimes C^*(G)) and such that the canonical induced map A\rtimes_\delta \widehat{G}\twoheadrightarrow A_\mu\rtimes_{\delta_\mu}\widehat{G} is an isomorphism.

Used by Theorem 5.11
Proposition

Proposition 3.2

8R96

Suppose that i_\mathcal K:\mathcal K\to \mathcal M(E) is a nondegenerate *-homomorphism and that \epsilon: E\to\mathcal M(E\otimes C^*(G)) is a coaction such that \epsilon(i_\mathcal K(k))=i_\mathcal K(k)\otimes 1 for all k\in \mathcal K (i.e., \epsilon is trivial on i_\mathcal K(\mathcal K)). Then \epsilon restricts to a coaction \delta: A\to \mathcal M(A\otimes C^*(G)) with A=C(E,i_\mathcal K) as in (?), such that \epsilon corresponds under the isomorphism E\cong A\otimes\mathcal K to the coaction \delta\otimes_*\operatorname{\mathrm{id}}_{\mathcal K} defined by

\delta\otimes_* \operatorname{\mathrm{id}}_{\mathcal K}:=(\operatorname{\mathrm{id}}_A\otimes \sigma)\circ (\delta\otimes \operatorname{\mathrm{id}}_{\mathcal K})

where \sigma: C^*(G)\otimes \mathcal K\to \mathcal K\otimes C^*(G) denotes the flip map.

Remark

Remark 3.3

UPGB

Fischer’s construction is functorial in the following sense: Suppose that i_{\mathcal K(\mathcal H)}:\mathcal K(\mathcal H)\to \mathcal M(E) and i_{\mathcal K(\mathcal H')}:\mathcal K(\mathcal H')\to \mathcal M(E') are nondegenerate *-homomorphisms and \epsilon and \epsilon' are coactions of G on E and E' that are trivial on the images of i_{\mathcal K(\mathcal H)} and i_{\mathcal K(\mathcal H)}, respectively. Let (A, \delta) and (A',\delta') denote the corresponding coactions as in the Proposition 3.2. If \Phi:E\to E' is an \epsilon-\epsilon' equivariant *-homomorphism such that \Phi\big((i_{\mathcal K(\mathcal H)}(\mathcal K(\mathcal H))\big)= i_{\mathcal K(\mathcal H')}(\mathcal K(\mathcal H')), then the restriction of \Phi to A\subseteq \mathcal M(E) induces a \delta-\delta' equivariant homomorphism \Phi|_A:A\to A'.

In particular, if \Phi:E\xrightarrow\sim E' is an isomorphism, then (A,\delta)\cong (A',\delta'). The proof is given in [Fischer-PhD]*Anhang A and also in [KOQ], where, indeed, much more general functoriality properties of Fischer’s construction are shown.

Used by Remark 4.9
Notation

Notation 4.2

8LIS

We call (A_\mu^\sigma,\delta_\mu^\sigma) the \sigma-deformation of (A_\mu,\delta_\mu).

Lemma

Lemma 4.4

XK0I

Let L^2(G_\sigma, \iota) denote the subspace of L^2(G_\sigma) consisting of all elements \xi\in L^2(G_\sigma) which satisfy \xi({\tilde{g}} z)=z\xi({\tilde{g}}) for all {\tilde{g}}\in G_\sigma, z\in \mathbb T. Then the pair (M^\sigma, \rho^\sigma) given by

(M^\sigma(f)\xi)({\tilde{g}})=f(g)\xi({\tilde{g}})\quad\text{and}\quad (\rho^\sigma_{{\tilde{g}}}\xi)(\tilde{t})=\Delta(g)^{1/2}\xi(\tilde{t}{\tilde{g}})

is a covariant representation for the twisted action (\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma):(G_\sigma,\mathbb T)\curvearrowright C_0(G) whose integrated form induces an isomorphism

M^\sigma\rtimes\rho^\sigma: C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G\xrightarrow\sim \mathcal K(L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)).
Proof of Lemma 4.4

The proof is a consequence of Green’s version of the Mackey machine (e.g., see [Green] or [CELY]*Chapter 1) which implies that the only irreducible representation of C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G is the one induced from the representation of C_0(G) given by evaluation at e\in G. One then checks that this representation is just the one described in the lemma.

Remark

Remark 4.5

QFGV

We note that any chosen Borel section \mathfrak s:G\to G_\sigma induces an isomorphism L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)\xrightarrow\sim L^2(G); \xi\mapsto \xi\circ \mathfrak s.

Lemma

Lemma 4.6

OHOG

Let W^\sigma=M^\sigma\otimes\operatorname{\mathrm{id}}_G(w_G)\in U\mathcal M(\mathcal K(L^2(G_\sigma, \iota))\otimes C^*(G)). Then, the isomorphism M^\sigma\rtimes \rho^\sigma: C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota)}G\to \mathcal K(L^2(G_{\sigma}, \iota)) identifies the dual coaction \widehat{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)} with the coaction k\mapsto (W^\sigma)^*(k\otimes 1)W^\sigma of G on \mathcal K(L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)).

As a consequence, if (B,\beta,\phi) is a weak G\rtimes G-algebra, then

W_B:=\big((i_B\circ \phi)\otimes \operatorname{\mathrm{id}}_G\big)(w_G)\in U\mathcal M\big(B\rtimes_{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)}G\otimes C^*(G)\big)

is a one-cocycle for the dual coaction \widehat{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)} on B\rtimes_{(\beta,\iota)}G such that the coaction \epsilon:=\textup{Ad} W_B\circ \widehat{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)} fixes the image \phi\rtimes G\big(C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G)\big) in \mathcal M(B\rtimes_{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)}G).

Proof of Lemma 4.6

It follows directly from the definition that, identifying C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G with \mathcal K(L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)) as above, the dual coaction \widehat{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)} on \mathcal K(L^2(G_\sigma, \iota)) is determined by the formulas

\widehat{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}(M^\sigma(f))= M^\sigma(f)\otimes 1\quad\text{and}\quad \widehat{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}(\rho^\sigma_{{\tilde{g}}})=\rho^\sigma_{{\tilde{g}}}\otimes u_g

for f\in C_0(G) and {\tilde{g}}\in G_\sigma. Thus, to prove the lemma, we need to check the equations

M^\sigma(f)\otimes 1=(W^\sigma)^*(M^\sigma(f)\otimes 1)W^\sigma\quad\text{and} \quad\rho^\omega_{{\tilde{g}}}\otimes u_g=(W^\sigma)^*(\rho^\sigma_{{\tilde{g}}}\otimes 1)W^\sigma

for all f\in C_0(G) and all {\tilde{g}}\in G_\sigma. The left equation is trivial since W^\sigma commutes with M^\sigma(f)\otimes 1 for all f\in C_0(G). For the right equation we identify \mathcal M(\mathcal K(L^2(G_\sigma,\iota))\otimes C^*(G)) with \mathcal L( L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)\otimes C^*(G)), the adjointable operators on the C^*(G)-Hilbert module L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)\otimes C^*(G), and then compute for any element \xi\in L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)\otimes C^*(G) (viewed as a function \xi:G_\sigma\to C^*(G)):

\begin{aligned} \big((W^\sigma)^*(\rho^\sigma_{{\tilde{g}}}\otimes 1)W^\sigma\xi\big)(\tilde{t})& =u_t^*\big(\rho^\sigma_{{\tilde{g}}}\otimes 1)W^\sigma\xi\big)(\tilde{t})\\ &=\sqrt{\Delta(g)}u_t^*(W^\sigma\xi)(\tilde{t}{\tilde{g}})\\ &=\sqrt{\Delta(g)}u_t^*u_{tg}\xi(\tilde{t}{\tilde{g}})\\ &=\sqrt{\Delta(g)}u_{g}\xi(\tilde{t}{\tilde{g}})\\ &=\big((\rho^\sigma_{{\tilde{g}}}\otimes u_g)\xi\big)(\tilde{t}). \end{aligned}

The result follows. The last statement is now a direct consequence of the \widehat{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}-\widehat{(\beta, \iota^\sigma)} equivariance of \Phi^\sigma:C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G\to \mathcal M(B\rtimes_{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)}G).

Notation

Notation 4.8

I3Y6

Starting above with (B,\beta,\phi)=(A_\mu\rtimes_{\delta_\mu}\widehat{G}, \widehat{\delta}_\mu, j_{C_0(G)}) for some \mu-coaction (A_\mu,\delta_\mu), we call (D^\sigma_\mu,\delta^\sigma_\mu) the Fischer deformation of (A_\mu,\delta_\mu).

Used by Theorem 5.11
Remark

Remark 4.9

CL70

If \omega\in Z^2(G,\mathbb T) is a Borel cocycle, let \sigma_\omega:=(\mathbb T\hookrightarrow G_\omega\twoheadrightarrow G) denote the associated central extension in which G_\omega=G\times \mathbb T (as a Borel space) equipped with the multiplication (g, z)(t, w)=(gt, \omega(g,t)zw). The associated Green-twisted crossed products C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^{\sigma_\omega})}G and B\rtimes_{(\beta, \iota^{\sigma_\omega})}G are then isomorphic to the more measure theoretic Busby-Smith crossed products C_0(G)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt},\omega}G and B\rtimes_{\beta,\omega}G, respectively, as used by Bhowmick, Neshveyev, and Sangha in [BNS].

To see the connection, let \sigma=(\mathbb T\hookrightarrow G_\sigma\twoheadrightarrow G) be any twist for G and let us choose a Borel section \mathfrak{s}:G\to G_\sigma for the quotient map G_\sigma\stackrel{q}{\twoheadrightarrow}G. Then

\omega:G\times G\to \mathbb T; \omega(g,t)=\mathfrak{s}(g)\mathfrak{s}(t)\mathfrak{s}(gt)^{-1}

is a corresponding cocycle whose class [\omega]\in H^2(G,\mathbb T) classifies \sigma (starting with \omega as above, we can recover \omega from \sigma_\omega via the section \mathfrak{s}(g)=(g,1)\in G_{\omega}). Following the construction of Green’s twisted crossed product as given in [Green]*p. 197, we obtain B\rtimes_{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)}G as a completion of the convolution algebra

C_c(G_\sigma,B, \iota^\sigma)=\{f:G_\sigma\to B: f(z {\tilde{g}} )=f({\tilde{g}})\bar{z}\}

with convolution and involution given by the formulas

f*_\sigma h({\tilde{g}})=\int_G f(\tilde{t})\beta_t(h(\tilde{t}^{-1}{\tilde{g}}))\, dt \quad\text{and}\quad f^*({\tilde{g}})=\Delta(g^{-1})\beta_g(f({\tilde{g}}^{-1}))^*

On the other hand, the Busby-Smith twisted crossed product B\rtimes_{\beta,\omega}G is a completion of the convolution algebra L^1(G, B,\omega), that is L^1(G,B) with convolution and involution given by

f*_\omega h(g)=\int_G f(t)\beta_t(h(t^{-1}g))\omega(t, t^{-1}g)\,dt \;\;\text{and}\;\; f^*(g)=\Delta(g^{-1})\overline{\omega(g, g^{-1})}f(g^{-1})^*.

It is then straightforward to check that \Phi:C_c(G_\sigma, B,\iota^\sigma)\to L^1(G,B,\omega); \Phi(f)= f\circ \mathfrak{s} extends to a *-isomorphism B\rtimes_{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)}G\cong B\rtimes_{\beta,\omega}G which is equivariant for the dual coactions (and similarly for C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G\cong C_0(G)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt},\omega}G) and intertwines the inclusions C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G\cong C_0(G)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt},\omega}G, respectively.

Hence, by Remark 3.3, all constructions above can be done as well in terms of Busby-Smith crossed products and their dual coactions. This yields deformed coactions (D^\omega_\mu,\delta^\omega_\mu) which, by Remark 3.3, are isomorphic to the deformed coactions (D^{\sigma_\omega}_\mu,\epsilon^{\sigma_\omega}_\mu) for the twist \sigma_\omega as above.

Starting then with the weak G\rtimes G-algebra (B,\beta,\phi)=(A\rtimes_\delta \widehat{G}, \widehat{\delta}, j_{C_0(G)}) for a normal coaction (A,\delta) of G, it follows from the proof of [BNS]*Theorem 3.4 that the deformed algebra A^\omega as in [BNS] coincides with the commutator algebra C(E,\iota(\mathcal K(L^2(G)))) of Fischer’s construction with E=B\rtimes_{\beta,\omega, r}G, the reduced twisted crossed product, and inclusion \iota=\phi\rtimes_\omega G:\mathcal K(L^2(G))\cong C_0(G)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt},\omega}G\to \mathcal M(E) given via the canonical map, if we identify B\rtimes_{\beta,\omega, r}G with \theta(A\rtimes_\delta \widehat{G}\rtimes_{\widehat{\delta}, \omega, r}G) as in the proof of [BNS]*Theorem 3.4. Thus A^\omega coincides with the Fischer deformed algebra D^{\omega}_r with respect to the reduced crossed product as introduced above. We leave it to the reader to check that the coaction \epsilon^\omega_r on D^\omega_r also coincides with the coaction \delta^\omega on A^\omega as constructed in [BNS]*Theorem 4.1.

Lemma

Lemma 5.1

CTOZ

Let \mathcal X be an A-B equivalence bimodule and suppose that S\in \mathcal M(\mathcal X) such that S^*S=1_{\mathcal M(B)} and SS^*=1_{\mathcal M(A)}. Then B\cong SBS^*=A via b\mapsto SbS^*. Here all multiplications are inside the linking algebra L(\mathcal M(\mathcal X)).

If, in addition, \delta_\mathcal X:\mathcal X\to \mathcal M(\mathcal X\otimes C^*(G)) is a coaction of G on \mathcal X which implements a Morita equivalence between the coactions (A,\delta_A) and (B,\delta_B), and such that

\delta_\mathcal X(S)=S\otimes 1

(using the unique extension of \delta_\mathcal X to \mathcal M(\mathcal X)) then the above isomorphism \textup{Ad} S: B\xrightarrow\sim A is \delta_B-\delta_A equivariant.

Proof of Lemma 5.1

The first assertion is straightforward, so we restrict to the second. So assume that \delta_\mathcal X(S)=S\otimes 1. We then get for all b\in B:

\begin{aligned} \delta_A(SbS^*)&=\delta_\mathcal X(S)\delta_B(b)\delta_\mathcal X(S^*)\\ &=(S\otimes 1)\delta_B(b)(S^*\otimes 1)\\ &=\textup{Ad} S\otimes \operatorname{\mathrm{id}}(\delta_B(b)), \end{aligned}

which is what we want.

Proposition

Proposition 5.4

EZ47

The representation (M\rtimes\rho, L^\sigma\rtimes\rho^\sigma, M^\sigma\rtimes \rho^\sigma) identifies the C_0(G)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt}}G-C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota)}G imprimitivity bimodule C_0(G_\sigma, \bar\iota)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt}^\sigma}G with the \mathcal K(L^2(G))-\mathcal K(L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)) imprimitivity bimodule \mathcal K(L^2(G), L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)) and, therefore, it extends to an isomorphism of multiplier bimodules

\begin{split}_{\mathcal M(C_0(G)\rtimes_\mathrm{rt} G)}\mathcal M(C_0(G_\sigma,\iota)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt}^\sigma}&G)_{\mathcal M(C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G)}\\ &\cong_{\mathcal B(L^2(G))}\mathcal B(L^2(G_\sigma,\iota), L^2(G))_{\mathcal B(L^2(G_\sigma, \iota))} \end{split}
Used by Proof
Lemma

Lemma 5.8

FBLH

Let L_\varphi: L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)\to L^2(G) and S_\varphi\in \mathcal M(C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G) be as above. Then

W^*(L_\varphi\otimes 1) W^\sigma= L_\varphi\otimes 1.

As a consequence, the preimage S_\varphi\in \mathcal M(C_0(G_\sigma,\bar\iota)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt}^\sigma}G) of L_\varphi under the isomorphism \mathcal M(C_0(G_\sigma,\bar\iota)\rtimes_{\mathrm{rt}^\sigma}G)\cong \mathcal B(L^2(G_\sigma,\iota), L^2(G)) is fixed by the dual coaction \widehat{\mathrm{rt}^\sigma} and the isomorphism \textup{Ad} S_\varphi: C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G\xrightarrow\sim C_0(G)\rtimes_\mathrm{rt} G of Lemma 5.1 is equivariant for the dual coactions.

Proof of Lemma 5.8

For \xi\otimes \psi\in L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)\otimes C_c(G) \subseteq L^2(G_\sigma,\iota)\otimes C^*(G) we compute

\begin{aligned} \big(W^*(L_\varphi\otimes 1) W^\sigma(\xi\otimes x)\big)(g, t)&= \big((L_\varphi\otimes 1) W^\sigma(\xi\otimes x)\big)(g, gt)\\ &=\varphi({\tilde{g}})\big(W^\sigma(\xi\otimes x)\big)({\tilde{g}}, gt)\\ &=\varphi({\tilde{g}})(\xi\otimes x)({\tilde{g}}, t)\\ &=\big((L_\varphi\otimes 1)(\xi\otimes x)\big)(g, t) \end{aligned}

This proves the equation (5.8). In particular, it follows that the isomorphism \textup{Ad} L_\varphi: \mathcal K(L^2(G_\sigma,\iota))\xrightarrow\sim \mathcal K(L^2(G)) is equivariant for the respective coactions as in (?). Since S_\varphi is the inverse image of L_\varphi under the isomorphism (5.4), the result follows.

Proposition

Proposition 5.10

AOOA

Let (B,\beta,\phi) be a weak G\rtimes G-algebra and let \sigma=(\mathbb T\hookrightarrow G_\sigma\twoheadrightarrow G) be a twist for G. Then the element R_\varphi\in \mathcal M(\mathcal E_\sigma(B)\rtimes_\gamma G) constructed above induces a \widehat{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)}-\widehat{\beta^\sigma} equivariant *-isomorphism

\textup{Ad} R_\varphi: B\rtimes_{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)}G\to B^\sigma\rtimes_{\beta^\sigma}G

such that following diagram commutes:

\begin{CD} C_0(G)\rtimes_{(\mathrm{rt},\iota^\sigma)}G @>\phi\rtimes G>> \mathcal M(B\rtimes_{(\beta,\iota^\sigma)}G)\\ @V\textup{Ad} S_\varphi VV @VV\textup{Ad} R_\varphi V\\ C_0(G)\rtimes_\mathrm{rt} G @>>\phi^\sigma\rtimes G> \mathcal M(B^\sigma\rtimes_{\beta^\sigma}G) \end{CD}
Used by Proof
Proof of Proposition 5.10

Everything, except (maybe) the commutativity of the diagram, follows directly from the discussion preceding the proposition. But the commutativity of the diagram follows from the equation R_\varphi=\psi\rtimes G(S_\varphi) and the fact that the triple (\phi^\sigma\rtimes G,\psi\rtimes G,\phi\rtimes G) is an imprimitivity bimodule map. This leads to the computation

\begin{aligned} \phi^\sigma\rtimes G(S_\varphi x S_\varphi^*)&= \psi\rtimes G(S_\varphi)(\phi\rtimes G(x))\psi\rtimes G(S_\varphi)^*\\ &=R_\varphi(\phi\rtimes G(x))R_\varphi^*. \end{aligned}
Theorem

Theorem 5.11

ZI4T

Let (A,\delta) be a maximal coaction and let \sigma=(\mathbb T\hookrightarrow G_\sigma\twoheadrightarrow G) be a twist for G. Then the maximal deformation (A^\sigma, \delta^\sigma) and the maximal Fischer deformation (D^\sigma, \epsilon^\sigma) are equivariantly isomorphic.

As a consequence (using Proposition 2.6) the same holds true for the \mu-deformations (A_\mu^\sigma, \delta_\mu^\sigma) and (D_\mu^\sigma, \epsilon_\mu^\sigma) for any duality crossed-product functor \rtimes_\mu.

Proof of Theorem 5.11

Just apply Proposition 5.10 to the weak G\rtimes G-algebra (B,\beta,\phi)=(A\rtimes_\delta \widehat{G}, \widehat{\delta}, j_{C_0(G)}) and use the functoriallity of Fischer’s construction.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2507.03563v2 by Alcides Buss and Siegfried Echterhoff, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2507/2507.03563.jsonl.