arXiv reader

Asymptotic solutions: glancing trajectories, Lagrangian singularities, and Bessel cylinders

Ilya Bogaevskii and Michel Rouleux

arXiv
2606.26962v1 · PDF · 25 June 2026
Categories
math-ph, math.MP
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

We find a normal form for the simplest Lagrangian singularity appearing as the projection onto the space-energy of a solution to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Using this normal form we approximate asymptotic solutions of an equation (\widehat{H}-E_0) \, u_h = f_h with a semiclassical distribution f_h microlocalized on a Lagrangian manifold \Lambda_0 when E_0 is a critical value of the restriction H|_{\Lambda_0}.

Items 15

Theorem

Theorem 1.1

BQVP

Let the following conditions hold:

  1. the restriction H|_{\Lambda_0} has a local non-degenerate extremum (maximum or minimum) E_0 at a point z_0 = (p_0,x_0);

  2. d H (z_0) \neq 0;

  3. z_\star = (p_\star, x_\star, t_\star, E_0) \in \Lambda is a point of the glancing trajectory \mathcal{C} starting at the point z_0;

  4. the restriction

    \pi_{t}|_\Lambda : \Lambda \to \mathbb{R}^{n+1}_{t}

    is a local diffeomorphism of a neighborhood of the point z_\star onto a neighborhood of the point (x_\star, t_\star), i. e. z_* is not a focal point.

Then there exists a local canonical diffeomorphism \gamma of T^\ast \mathbb{R}^{n+1}_{t} defined in a neighborhood of the point z_\star and satisfying the following conditions:

  • \gamma: z_\star \mapsto 0;

  • \gamma sends the fibres of the projection \pi_{E} to each other;

  • \gamma sends the hypersurface E=E_0 to E=0;

  • the Lagrangian submanifold \Lambda' = \gamma (\Lambda) is given by the following equations

    S'(x,t) = t^3/3 + (x_2^2 + \dots + x_{n}^2) t, \quad E = - \partial_{t} S', \quad p = \partial_x S'

    in a neighborhood of the point \gamma(z_\star) = 0.

Remark

Remark 1.2

1UFK

Any local canonical diffeomorphism satisfying the first three conditions of Theorem 1.1 is written as

\gamma: (p,x,t,E) \mapsto \bigl( \mathrm{p}'(p,x,t,E), \, \mathrm{x}'(x,E), \, \mathrm{t}'(p,x,t,E), \, \mathrm{E}'(x,E) \bigr),

where

d \mathrm{p}' \wedge d \mathrm{x}' + d \mathrm{t}' \wedge d \mathrm{E}' = d p \wedge d x + d t \wedge d E,
\mathrm{p}'(z_\star)=0, \quad \mathrm{t}'(z_\star)=0, \quad \mathrm{x}'(x_\star,E_0) = 0, \quad \mathrm{E}'(x,E_0) = 0.

It is well known (see e. g. [AVG, 18.5], [DoNa1, (3.1)]) that any such a diffeomorphism is affine in the fibres of \pi_{E} and uniquely defined by some smooth function W(x,E) and the changes \mathrm{x}'(x,E), \mathrm{E}'(x,E):

(\mathrm{p}',\mathrm{t}') = (p,t) \left( \begin{array}{cc} \partial_x \mathrm{x}' & \partial_E \mathrm{x}' \\ \partial_x \mathrm{E}' & \partial_E \mathrm{E}' \end{array} \right)^{-1} + \bigl( \partial_x W(\mathrm{x}', \mathrm{E}'),\partial_E W(\mathrm{x}', \mathrm{E}') \bigr)
Example

Example 1.3

0J0A

1) \Lambda_0 is the vertical plane. Consider \Lambda_0=\mathbb{R} ^n_p and H(x,p)=p^2-x_1 (Stark effect), H|_{\Lambda_0}=p^2 has a non degenerate maximum for E=0. The trajectories issued from x=0 are given by x_1=t^2+2\eta_1t, x'=2\eta't, p_1=t+\eta_1, p'=\eta', where \eta=(\eta_1,\eta')\in \mathbb{R} ^n. We have H|_\Lambda=\eta^2. On the glancing trajectory x_1=t^2, x_2=0, p_1=t, p'=0, and H=0. See [AnDoNaRo3], Sect.4 for the non-glancing case \eta_1>0,\eta'=0.

2) \Lambda_0 is “horizontal”. Let

\begin{gathered} H = -p_1, \quad S_0(x) = x_1^3/3 + x_1(x_2^2 + \dots + x_n^2), \quad z_0=0, \\ \Lambda_0 = \left\{ p = \partial_x S_0 \right\} = \left\{ p_1 = x_1^2 + \dots + x_n^2, \; p_2 = 2 x_1 x_2, \; \dots, \; p_n = 2 x_1 x_n \right\}. \end{gathered}

Then

\begin{gathered} S(x,t) = (x_1+t)^3/3 + (x_1+t)(x_2^2 + \dots + x_n^2), \\ \Lambda= \left\{ p_x = \partial_x S, \; E = - \partial_t S \right\}. \end{gathered}

The trajectory starting at z_0=0 is p=0, x_1=-t, x_2=\dots=x_n=0, E=0; let z_\star be its point for t=t_\star. Then the canonical transformation

(p,x,t,E) \mapsto (p_1+E, p_2, \dots, p_n, x_1+t_\star, x_2, \dots, x_n, t+x_1, E)

gives

S'(x,t) = t^3/3 + (x_2^2 + \dots + x_{n}^2) t

according to Theorem 1.1. Both examples are actually closely related by a canonical transformation.

Remark

Remark 1.4

6J3K

Our normal form of Theorem 1.1 coincides with one of the normal forms given in [ZaMy, Theorem 2] with respect to another equivalence group consisting of all canonical diffeomorphisms preserving the function E. In the present paper we preserve the projection \pi_{E} together with one fixed level of E, and get only one normal form of [ZaMy, Theorem 2] due to the condition that E_0 is a local degenerate maximum or minimum of H|_{\Lambda_0}. Otherwise minus signs may appear in the expression x_2^2 + \dots + x_{n}^2.

Remark

Remark 1.5

2GIK

In terms of generating families (phase functions) — see e. g. [AVG, Iv], or Subsection ? of the present paper — Theorem 1.1 is reformulated in the following way. The Lagrangian submanifold \Lambda in a neighborhood of the point z_\star is defined by a generating family

\Phi(\theta, x, E) = S(x,\theta) + E \theta, \quad \Lambda = \left\{ \partial_\theta \Phi =0, \; p=\partial_x \Phi, \; t=\partial_E \Phi\right\},

and there exist a smooth reversible change of coordinates

(\theta,x,E) \mapsto \bigl( \theta'(\theta,x,E)), \, \mathrm{x}'(x,E), \, \mathrm{E}'(x,E) \bigr)

and a smooth function W(x, E) such that

  • \theta'(t_\star, x_\star, E_0) = 0, \quad \mathrm{x}'(x_\star,E_0) = 0, \quad \mathrm{E}'(x,E_0) = 0;

  • \Phi(\theta,x,E) = \Phi'(\theta', \mathrm{x}',\mathrm{E}') in a neighborhood of the point z_\star where

    \Phi'(\theta, x, E) = S'(x,\theta) + E \theta - W(x,E), \;\; S'(x,\theta) = \theta^3/3 + (x_2^2 + \dots + x_{n}^2) \theta.
Assumptions

Assumptions 2.1

0H0E

.

  1. The amplitude a has a compact support \mathop{\mathrm{supp}}\nolimits{a} \subset \Lambda_0.

  2. The phase flow g^t of the Hamiltonian vector field v_H generated by H

    g^t: T^\ast \mathbb{R}^n \to T^\ast \mathbb{R}^n, \quad \dot{x} = \partial_{p} H(p,x), \quad \dot{p}= - \partial_{x} H(p,x)

    is defined for all z \in \Lambda_0, t \ge 0.

  3. For any R > 0, there exists t_R such that \bigl| \pi \bigl( g^t(z) \bigr) \bigr| > R for all t > t_R and z \in \Lambda_0, where

    \pi : T^\ast \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^n, \quad (p,x) \mapsto x

    is the natural projection. In particular, all points of \Lambda_0 are not singular for the Hamiltonian vector field v_H: d H (z_0) \neq 0 for all z_0 \in \Lambda_0.

Remark

Remark 2.2

MR2G

If we write the initial amplitude in the form a(x',x_n,\xi) (without eliminating x) we get instead

u_h(x)={i\over h}\int_0^\infty\theta_T(t)\,dt\int^* e^{i(x'p'+(x_n-t)p_n)/h}e^{itE/h}a(x',x_n-t,p;h)\,dp
Remark

Remark 2.3

S506

Formula (2.8) from [AnDoNaRo3, Theorem 2] contains a cutoff function \chi needed for convergence of the integral (2.8). But our condition ? from Assumptions 2.1 is stronger that condition III from [AnDoNaRo3, 2.1] and implies that the integral (2.8) from [AnDoNaRo3, Theorem 2] is well defined even if \chi \equiv 1.

Formula (2.8) from [AnDoNaRo3, Theorem 2] is proved there if E=0 and \Lambda_0 is vertical. But its generalization for the case E \neq 0 is obvious. The case of an arbitrary Lagrangian submanifold \Lambda_0 does not have any obstacles as well — see [AnDoNaRo3, 2.6. Discussion, 4].

But despite the above arguments it is not proved that the formula (?) gives an asymptotic solution in the described generality. So we formulate our Theorem 2.5 for the integral (?) but not for an asymptotic solution of the equation (?).

Theorem

Theorem 2.5

WQBN

Let

u_h(x,E) = \frac{i}{h} \int\limits_{0}^{+\infty} [\mathcal{K}_\Lambda (A_h)](x,t) \, \exp{ \left\{ \frac{i E t}{h} \right\} } \, d t

be the function defined by (?), (?), and the conditions ?–? from Assumptions 2.1 hold with the following ones:

  1. The restriction H|_{\Lambda_0} attains its a local non-degenerate extremum E_0 at a point z_0 = (p_0,x_0).

  2. z_\star = (p_\star, x_\star, t_\star, E_0) \in \Lambda, t_\star > 0 is a point of the glancing trajectory \mathcal{C} starting at the point z_0.

  3. The restriction

    \pi_{t}|_\Lambda : \Lambda \to \mathbb{R}^{n+1}_{t}

    is a local diffeomorphism of a neighborhood of the point z_\star onto a neighborhood of the point (x_\star, t_\star).

  4. From the half-space t>0 the only point z_\star is sent to the point (x_\star, E_0) by the restriction

    \pi_{E}|_{\Lambda } : \Lambda \to \mathbb{R}^{n+1}_{E}.
  5. x_\star \notin \pi(\mathop{\mathrm{supp}}\nolimits{a}).

Then

in some local smooth coordinates

x=X(y), \quad y=(y_1,\dots, y_n)

in a neighborhood of the point x_\star:

\begin{gathered} u_h \bigl( X(y), E_0 \bigr) = {} \\ \left[ h^{-\frac23} b_h(y) \mathop{\rm Ai}\nolimits \left( h^{-\frac23} r^2 \right) + h^{-\frac13} c_h(y) \mathop{\rm Ai}\nolimits' \left( h^{-\frac23} r^2 \right) \right] \exp{\frac{i w(y)}{h}} + {O}(h^\infty), \\ r^2 = y_2^2 + \dots + y_n^2, \quad h \to +0 \end{gathered}

where w, b_h, c_h are smooth functions, \mathop{\rm Ai}\nolimits is the Airy function, and \mathop{\rm Ai}\nolimits' is its derivative.

Proposition

Proposition 3.1

18ER

Let \Lambda_0 be the n-dimensional Bessel cylinder (?) and H\in C^\infty(T^*\mathbb{R}^n) be homogeneous of degree m with respect to p. Then z=(x,p)\in\Lambda_0 is a glancing point at energy E if and only if

\partial_p H(z) + \varphi\partial_x H(z) = m H\omega(\psi), \; \langle-\partial_x H(z), \omega(\psi) \rangle=0, \; H(z)=E
Example

Example 3.2

EN0A

: Let n=2, m=1, H(z)=\frac{|p|}{\rho(x)}, with \rho(x)=\frac{1}{2}(1+(x-x_0)^2). If x_0=\varphi\omega(\psi)\neq0, we have \rho^4(x_0)\det \nabla^2 (H|_{\Lambda_0})=\varphi^2, \rho^2(x_0)\mathop{\rm Tr}\nolimits \nabla^2 (H|_{\Lambda_0})=-(1+\varphi^2). Critical energy is given by E=H(z)=\frac{|p|}{\rho(x)}, i. e. E_0=1/\rho(x_0).

Proposition

Proposition 3.3

77WT

Let H(x,p) be positively homogeneous of degree 1 with respect to p. Then

\Phi(\theta, x, t) = \varphi + \lambda \langle P(\varphi, \psi, t) , x - X(\varphi, \psi, t) \rangle, \quad \theta = (\lambda, \varphi, \psi) \in \mathbb{R}^{n+1}

is a generating family for \Lambda \subset T^\ast \mathbb{R}^{n+1}_\mathrm{t} at the points satisfying the inequality \det(P,P_\psi)\neq0, which holds at least for small t (because \det(P,\partial_\psi P)=1 for t=0). In particular, \Phi satisfies the initial condition \Phi(\theta, 0, x)=\Phi_0(\theta,x).

Proposition

Proposition 3.4

18OM

Let H(x,p) be positively homogeneous of degree 1 with respect to p, \Phi be the generating family for \Lambda\subset \mathbb{R}^{n+1}_\mathrm{t} from Proposition 3.3, \theta=(\lambda,\varphi,\psi), and y=(\varphi,\psi,t). Then

F[\Phi,dy]|_{C_\Phi}= \pm\det(P,\partial_\psi P).
Proposition

Proposition 4.1

IXV3

Assume \Lambda as above to be parameterized by a quadratic phase \phi=\phi_0. In Cases (I), (II), (III) \phi_0 are one-parameter families taking values:

\begin{aligned} &(I) \quad \phi_0(x)=\frac12(ax_1^2-2x_1x_2)\cr &(II) \quad \phi_0(p)=\frac12(2p_1p_2+cp_2^2)\cr &(III) \quad \phi_0(x_2,p_1)=\frac12b(p_1+x_2)^2 \end{aligned}

respectively, where a,b,c\neq0. The manifold \Lambda is transverse to F at z=0, and the corresponding matrices A_z(\Lambda,G),B_z(\Lambda,G) above are then given by:

\begin{aligned} &(I) \quad A_z=2\begin{pmatrix}1&a\\ a&a^2\end{pmatrix}, \quad B_z=2\begin{pmatrix}-a \\ 1\end{pmatrix}\cr &(II) \quad A_z=2\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\ 0&1\end{pmatrix}, \quad B_z=2 \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\cr &(III) \quad A_z=2\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\ 0&1\end{pmatrix}, \quad B_z=2 \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned}

So with the notations of Definition 1.3, case (I) is of type (6) or (7) according to a^3+2a^2+1=0 or not, while cases (II) and and (III) are of type (6).

At last, Case (IV) does not occur.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:2606.26962v1 by Ilya Bogaevskii and Michel Rouleux, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/2606/2606.26962.jsonl.