Put D_i=[P_i-P_1] and H_0=\langle D_2,D_3,D_4,D_5\rangle. Appendix ? gives the complete containing-space and local stopping argument in the genus-three framework of [BPS], including the 7-adic kernel witness and the literal 5-adic obstruction. Together with the independently checked lower bound, it proves
\dim_{\mathbf F_2}\operatorname{Sel}_2(J_+/K_7)=4,
\qquad \operatorname{rank} J_+(K_7)=4,
\qquad \mathop{\mathrm{Sha}}(J_+/K_7)[2]=0.
The independent 2-saturation witness shows that D_2,D_3,D_4,D_5 form a basis modulo 2. Thus H_0 has odd index. The existence of the fifth-division class used below can be seen from the branch divisor. Write A=(t)_0/5, a K_7-rational divisor of degree three, and set B=[A-3P_1]. The pole divisor is (t)_\infty=7P_3+7P_4+P_5, so
5B=7D_3+7D_4+D_5.
Consequently the class E=3B-4D_3-4D_4 satisfies
5E=D_3+D_4+3D_5.
Set H_1=\langle D_2,E,D_4,D_5\rangle. Equation (Proof) gives H_0\subseteq H_1. Four independent local C_{25} rows have determinant 4 modulo 5, and J_+(K_7)[5]=0; hence H_1 is 5-saturated. Its index is therefore coprime to 400, and H_1\to J_+(K_7)/400J_+(K_7) is surjective. This is the coefficient coverage used in the sieve.
At the split primes
23,43,67,71,79,107,109,113,
both reductions of the curve are enumerated, as are the images of every reduced point in the relevant local quotients of J_+. The same global coefficient vector must occur at both places. In addition, rationality of t(Q) imposes equality of the two projective reductions of t. The resulting finite sieve has the following exact counts:
\begin{array}{lr}
\toprule
\text{stage}&\text{surviving coefficient classes}\\
\midrule
\text{coupled $2$-primary sieve modulo $16$}&592\\
\text{$5$-primary prefilter modulo $25$}&1252\\
\text{joint point fingerprints modulo $400$}&144\\
\bottomrule
\end{array}
The final classes use exactly the five vectors modulo 25
(0,0,0,0),\ (1,0,0,0),\ (0,5,24,22),\
(0,0,1,0),\ (0,0,0,1),
and their projection at the two primes above 23 consists precisely of the five ordered residue pairs of P_1,\ldots,P_5.
The combined 23-adic logarithm matrix has size 6\times4 and rank 4. The resulting two independent logarithmic functionals vanish on H_0. Since H_0 has finite index, they vanish on all of J_+(K_7): for any P\in J_+(K_7), a nonzero integer multiple of P lies in H_0, and the logarithm takes values in characteristic zero. At the disks of P_2,P_3,P_4,P_5, the Siksek tangent determinants modulo 23 are
12,\quad16,\quad4,\quad19.
This is the number-field Chabauty criterion of [Siksek]; the values are units, so each disk contains only its reference point among common Coleman zeros.
At P_1, write the two local parameters as 23u,23v, so that the whole product residue disk is parametrized by (u,v)\in\mathbf Z_{23}^2. For the two annihilator integrals F_1,F_2, use the normalized equations F_1/23=0 and (F_2-6F_1)/23^2=0. The second numerator is integrally divisible by 23^2: its linear coefficients vanish modulo 23 before scaling, and all higher terms supply the extra factor. The reductions are
2u+4v=0,\qquad
21u+6v+14u^2+21v^2=0.
They have exactly two simple reduced zeros,
(u,v)=(0,0),\qquad(14,16),
with determinants 20 and 3. Multivariate Hensel lifting gives one exact common zero in each of these two classes and none elsewhere. The first is P_1. The arithmetic retains seven digits after both normalizing divisions: an omitted integrated term of exponent k\ge12 has valuation at least k-v_{23}(k)\ge12, and the coefficient arithmetic retains the required precision. Multiplication by 23 gives the local coordinates modulo 23^8. The canonical parameter denominator is a unit at both lifted endpoints, so its evaluation preserves those eight digits. At the second zero, the two parameter values modulo 23^8=78{,}310{,}985{,}281 are
t_{s=4}=59{,}233{,}664{,}629,\qquad
t_{s=19}=24{,}239{,}267{,}738.
Their difference has exact 23-adic valuation 5, with first nonzero quotient digit 9. Hence this common Coleman zero does not have rational t. The five reference points are therefore the entire rational-parameter locus.