arXiv reader

Group Orders That Imply a Nontrivial p-Core

Rafael Villarroel-Flores

arXiv
math/0312342v3 · PDF · 7 October 2021
Categories
math.GR
Licence
CC BY 4.0 The site shows the text.

Abstract

Given a prime number p and a natural number m not divided by p, we propose the problem of finding the smallest number r_{0} such that for r\geq r_{0}, every group G of order p^{r}m has a non-trivial normal p-subgroup. We prove that we can explicitly calculate the number r_{0} in the case where every group of order p^{r}m is solvable for all r, and we obtain the value of r_{0} for a case where m is a product of two primes.

Items 12

Theorem

Theorem B.1

MEYJ

For any prime number p and natural number m such that p\nmid m, there is a number \Lambda(p,m) such that if r\geq \Lambda(p,m), any group of order p^{r}m has a non-trivial p-core O_{p}(G).

Proof of Theorem B.1

Let G be a group of order p^{r}m with O_{p}(G)=1. Let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Since the kernel of the action of G on the set of cosets of P is precisely O_{p}(G), we obtain that G embeds in S_{m}, and so p^{r} divides (m-1)!. Hence, if p^{r_{0}} is the largest power of p dividing (m-1)!, we obtain that \Lambda(p,m)\leq r_{0}+1.

Theorem

Theorem B.2

3RCX

Let n=p^{s}m where p\nmid m and s>0. If p^{s}\mid\Gamma(m), then there is a group of order n with O_{p}(G)=1.

Proof of Theorem B.2

Let K be the group C_{q_1}^{t_1}\times\cdots\times C_{q_k}^{t_k}, that is, a product of elementary abelian groups, where m=q_{1}^{t_1}\cdots q_{k}^{t_k} and q_{1},\ldots,q_{k} are distinct primes and C_{q} denotes the cyclic group of order q. Then \Gamma(m) divides the order of \mathop{\mathrm{Aut}}(K), and hence so does p^{s}. Let H be a subgroup of \mathrm{Aut}(K) of order p^{s}. For every S\in H and k\in K define the map T_{S,k}\colon K\to K by T_{S,k}(x)=Sx+k. Then G=\left\{\,T_{S,k}\mid S\in H, k\in K\,\right\} is also a subgroup of \mathrm{Aut}(K). If we identify H with the subgroup of maps of the form T_{S,0} and K with the subgroup of maps of the form T_{1_K,k}, then G is just the semidirect product of K by H. Hence |G|=n. We have that G acts transitively on K in a natural fashion, and the stabilizer of 0\in K is H, a p-Sylow subgroup of G. Hence the stabilizers of points in K are precisely the Sylow subgroups of G, so their intersection O_{p}(G) contains only the identity K\to K, as we wanted to prove.

Theorem

Theorem B.3

R7D5

Let n=p^{s}m, where p\nmid m. If G is a group of order n and p^{s} does not divide \Gamma(m) then either:

    2em O_{p}(G)\ne 1, or 2em G is not solvable.

Used by Proof, Proof, Proof
Proof of Theorem B.3

Let G be solvable with order n=p^{s}m and O_{p}(G)=1. Let F(G) be the Fitting subgroup of G. Consider the map c\colon G\to\mathop{\mathrm{Aut}}(F(G)), sending g to c_{g}\colon F(G)\to F(G) given by conjugation by g. The restriction of c to P, a p-Sylow subgroup of G, has kernel P\cap C_{G}(F(G)). Since C_{G}(F(G))\le F(G) (Theorem 7.67 from cite MR1298629-djvu), and F(G) does not contain elements of order p by our assumption on O_{p}(G), we have P\cap C_{G}(F(G))=1 and so P acts faithfully on F(G). If m=q_{1}^{t_1}\cdots q_{k}^{t_k} is the prime factorization of m, we have that F(G) is the direct product of the O_{q_{i}}(G) for i=1,\ldots,k. Hence P\le\mathop{\mathrm{Aut}}(F(G))\cong \mathop{\mathrm{Aut}}(O_{q_1}(G))\times\cdots\times \mathop{\mathrm{Aut}}(O_{q_k}(G)). Let g\in P such that the action induced by c_{g} on \prod_{i} O_{q_i}(G)/\Phi(O_{q_i}(G)), is the identity. Since c_{g} acts on each factor O_{q_i}(G)/\Phi(O_{q_i}(G)) as the identity, then by Theorem 5.1.4 from cite MR569209-big, we have that it acts as the identity on each O_{q_i}(G). By the faithful action of P on F(G), we have that g=1. This implies that P acts faithfully on \prod_{i} O_{q_i}(G)/\Phi(O_{q_i}(G)). But then |P| divides the order of the automorphism group of \prod_{i} O_{q_i}(G)/\Phi(O_{q_i}(G)), which is a product of elementary abelian groups of respective orders q_{i}^{s_i} with s_{i}\le t_{i} for all i. Hence p^{s}=|P| divides \Gamma(m).

Corollary

Corollary B.4

W5LP

Let p^{s} be the largest power of p that divides \Gamma(m). If m is prime, or if both p,m are odd, then \Lambda(p,m)=s+1.

Proof of Corollary B.4

By Burnside’s p,q-theorem, and the Odd Order Theorem, we have that all groups that have order of the form p^{r}m for some r are solvable. Therefore, for all r>s, by Theorem r@solvablesolvable we have that all groups of order p^{r}m have non-trivial p-core.

Theorem

Theorem B.5

Z37R

Let n=p^{s}m where p\nmid m and s>0. If p^{s}\mid\Gamma(m), but p^{s}\nmid\Gamma(m') for all proper divisors m' of m, then up to isomorphism, the group constructed in the proof of Theorem r@lowerboundlowerbound is the only solvable group of order n with O_{p}(G)=1.

Proof of Theorem B.5

With the notation of the argument of the proof of r@solvablesolvable, if G is a solvable group of order n with O_{p}(G)=1, we must have that |O_{q_{i}}(G)|=q_{i}^{t_{i}} and \Phi(O_{q_i}(G))=1 for all i in order to satisfy the divisibility conditions. Hence O_{q_{i}}(G) is elementary abelian and a q_{i}-Sylow subgroup for all i, and so G is the semidirect product of a p-Sylow subgroup P of F(G)=C_{q_1}^{t_1}\times\cdots\times C_{q_k}^{t_k} with F(G), where the action of P on F(G) by conjugation is faithful. Hence G is isomorphic to the group constructed in the proof of Theorem r@solvablesolvable.

Theorem

Theorem C.1

ES7I

Every group G of order 2^{r}\cdot 3\cdot 5 for r\geq 4 is such that O_{2}(G)\ne 1.

Proof of Theorem C.1

Let G be a group of order 2^{r}\cdot 3\cdot 5 for r\geq4. Suppose that O_{2}(G)=1. From Theorem r@solvablesolvable, we obtain that G is not solvable. We will prove then that O_{3}(G)= 1. Suppose otherwise, and let T=O_{3}(G). Then |G/T|=2^{r}\cdot 5, and so G/T is solvable. Since 2^{r}\nmid \Gamma(5), from Theorem r@solvablesolvable, we have that O_{2}(G/T)\ne 1. Let L\lhd G such that O_{2}(G/T)=L/T. Suppose |L/T|=2^{j}. Since O_{2}(G/L)=1, |G/L|=2^{r-j}\cdot 5 and G/L is solvable, we have that 2^{r-j} divides \Gamma(5)=2^{2}, that is, r-j\leq 2. Now, L is also solvable and \Gamma(3)=3-1=2, hence if we had j\geq 2 we would have O_{2}(L)\ne 1, and G would have a non-trivial subnormal 2-subgroup, which contradicts our assumption that O_{2}(G)=1. Hence j=1. But then r-1\leq 2, which contradicts that r\geq 4. Hence O_{3}(G)=1. By a similar argument, we get that O_{5}(G)=1.

From cite 1968-brauer-on-simple-groups-of-order-5dot-3-spadot-2-spb we obtain that G is not simple. Hence G has a proper minimal normal subgroup M. From the previous paragraph, we obtain that M is not abelian, since in that case we would have that M\leq F(G). The only possibility is that M=A_{5}. We have then a morphism c\colon G\to \mathrm{Aut}(A_{5}) sending g to c_{g}, the conjugation by g. Since \mathrm{Aut}(A_{5})=S_{5}, and |c(G)|=|\mathrm{Inn}(G)|\geq |\mathrm{Inn}(A_{5})|=60, in any case the kernel of c is a nontrivial normal 2-subgroup.

Source and licence

The text on this page is from arXiv:math/0312342v3 by Rafael Villarroel-Flores, under the licence CC BY 4.0. The corpus made these changes: it read the items out of the LaTeX source, it expanded the macros of the paper, it put each proof after its statement, and it converted the text to HTML. The formulas are the TeX of the paper, and KaTeX renders them. A formula or a reference can look different from the PDF. The page is published under CC BY 4.0.

The record of each item is in analysis/objects/0312/math-0312342.jsonl.